Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1986
	THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES
	 
	 
	 
	In the course of the war of June 1967, Israel occupied the
	West Bank, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip,
	and the Sinai Peninsula. As a result of the Peace Treaty
	between Egypt and Israel, the Sinai Peninsula was restored to
	Egypt. No peace treaty has, however, been concluded between
	Israel and its other neighboring countries. The West Bank and
	Gaza remain under military government. Israel regards East
	Jerusalem and the Golan Heights as subject to Israeli law,
	jurisdiction, and administration.
	 
	The United States holds the view that Israel is an occupying
	power in these territories and, therefore, that its
	administration is subject to the Hague regulations of 1907 and
	the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention concerning the protection of
	civilian populations under military occupation.
	 
	Israel denies the applicability of the Fourth Geneva
	Convention to the West Bank and Gaza, but states that it
	voluntarily observes most of the Convention's provisions in
	these areas. Major differences have arisen in regard to the
	applicability of these provisions in East Jerusalem and the
	Golan Heights, to the introduction of civilian settlers, and
	to collective punishment. Israel enforces Jordanian law in
	the West Bank and British Mandatory regulations in the Gaza
	Strip, although it has issued military orders significantly
	altering or overriding portions of these laws.
	 
	The complex human rights situation in the occupied territories
	reflects the fact that, in the absence of a peace settlement,
	the territories remain under military administration and there
	is friction between occupation authorities and the Palestinian
	population. Among the signs of friction are active resistance
	to the occupation, including episodes of violence, sometimes
	encouraged by outside extremist groups. Friction also arises
	from security measures taken by Israel to counter terrorism
	and other perceived threats to security. Other causes of
	friction are the introduction of civilian Israeli settlers,
	advocacy of annexation or permanent control of the territories
	by some Israeli political figures, as well as the refusal of
	the main Palestinian organizations to recognize Israel or to
	promote a negotiated peace. Limits on economic enterprise,
	especially that which would compete with Israeli products, are
	also a source of contention.
	 
	Israel implements its policy in the territories through a Civil
	Administration created in 1981 under Defense Ministry control.
	It is staffed by military and civilian personnel. Israel's
	national police, border police, security service, and the
	Israel Defense Forces (IDF) all have a role in administration.
	The national police, which includes local Palestinians in its
	ranks, is seldom criticized. However, there are frequent
	complaints by West Bankers and Gazans about the actions of the
	other organizations.
	 
	The Civil Administration has sought to reshape local politics,
	notably by trying to reduce the influence of the Palestine
	Liberation Organization (PLO) and other dissident Palestinian
	organizations. Israel has also discouraged political
	organizations beyond the municipal levels. It permitted
	municipal elections in 1972 and 1976, but after 1980, citing
	security concerns, postponed further elections and eventually
	removed many elected and appointed officials. Threats by
	extremists have also inhibited the development of moderate
	Palestinian leaders; even those who have expressed support
	 
	for the PLO have been intimidated for cooperating with Israel.
	Since 1985, Israel has supported the installation of non-PLO
	Palestinian mayors who have local and Jordanian support in
	place of Israeli military appointees.
	 
	Israel has allowed the establishment of four universities in
	the West Bank and one in Gaza where none existed before 1967,
	but has restricted student and faculty activities which it
	sees as threatening security. Israel permits criticism of its
	policies by the East Jerusalem-based Arabic press but often
	censors articles and editorials and restricts circulation of
	Arabic publications in the West Bank and Gaza. One Arabic
	newspaper and one magazine were closed in 1986. Broad
	restrictions on speech and assembly apply in the occupied
	territories .
	 
	Arab and Jewish residents continued to suffer from violent
	acts in 1986, although at a lower level than in 1985. PLO
	factions and various PLO dissident groups claimed
	responsibility for nearly all violent acts against the IDF,
	Israeli civilians, or Palestinians who disagreed with such
	groups. Much of the violence appears, however, to have been
	spontaneous and local.
	 
	Arab complaints of settler violence continued throughout the
	year, including unauthorized armed patrols, physical
	harassment, and disruption of legally authorized political
	meetings. Two IDF officers were convicted in 1986 for violence
	against Arabs, and one member of a Jewish underground
	organization was extradited from the United States and
	sentenced to prison. In 1986 the President commuted sentences
	imposed on six members of this organization, who had been
	convicted in 1985 and had served in prison for one half to
	two thirds of 2- to 4-year sentences.
	 
	RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
	 
	Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including
	Freedom from:
	 
	a. Political Killing
	 
	Political killing is not condoned by Israel. However, there
	have been deaths and injuries as a result of both terrorist
	acts and IDF security measures.
	 
	Attacks by Arabs took the lives of at least 1 IDF soldier,
	4 Israeli civilians in the West Bank and Gaza (in addition to
	4 who were killed in Israel) and 3 Arabs, while at least 9 IDF
	soldiers, 37 Jewish civilians, and 4 Arabs were wounded. In
	March the appointed mayor of Nablus was assassinated. The Abu
	Nidal group and the Popular Front for the Liberation of
	Palestine (PFLP) claimed responsibility, but no one had been
	arrested for the crime as of the end of 1986. In October,
	1 Israeli civilian was killed, 67 Israeli civilians and
	soldiers were injured, and 2 Arabs were injured by a
	handgrenade attack near the Western Wall in Jerusalem. The
	PLO claimed responsibility.
	 
	In November an Israeli student was knifed to death near a
	Jewish religious school in the Arab quarter of the old city of
	Jerusalem. Three Palestinians were arrested shortly after the
	incident and later sentenced to life imprisonment for
	committing the murder. They were linked to the PFLP. The
	killing sparked anti-Arab demonstrations and vandalism which
	 
	continued for several weeks. In December an elderly Israeli
	was stabbed and wounded in the same area.
	 
	At least 7 unarmed Arabs were killed in 1986 and more than 29
	were wounded in incidents involving IDF soldiers enforcing
	security regulations. Two of the seven killed were students
	at Bir Zeit University where IDF soldiers opened fire on
	demonstrators. During the same week two Palestinian boys,
	14 and 12 years old, were shot and killed and others were
	wounded by gunfire in separate incidents near the Balata
	refugee camp. In October a Palestinian student was shot and
	wounded by security forces at Bethlehem University during an
	antioccupation demonstration. Israeli authorities stated that
	Palestinian demonstrators had been throwing rocks and bottles
	and that the IDF acted in self-defense in these incidents.
	However, it appears that the deaths could have been avoided by
	use of nonlethal crowd control measures. The IDF limited its
	use of lethal force in subsequent disturbances linked to the
	Bir Zeit and Balata incidents.
	 
	In other incidents, two missing Palestinians were found dead
	at the sites of explosions. Palestinians claimed they were
	killed by Israeli settlers; the authorities said they died as
	a result of accidental explosions of their own bombs. One
	Palestinian woman was killed when, according to the IDF, she
	attacked a soldier. Palestinians claimed she accidentally
	fell on the soldier and was killed by another soldier, who
	panicked.
	 
	b. Disappearance
	 
	Israeli authorities neither sponsor nor condone disappearances.
	 
	c. Torture and Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or
	Punishment
	 
	Torture is forbidden by Israeli law and Israeli authorities say
	they do not condone torture. Israeli border and national
	policemen have been convicted of abusive force against Arab
	prisoners, and the Israeli Supreme Court has at times ordered
	the withdrawal from evidence of confessions found to have been
	coerced. Palestinians complain of widespread and systematic
	mistreatment. They assert that nearly all convictions in
	security cases are based on confessions, that attorneys are
	normally not allowed to see clients until they have confessed,
	and that the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
	is denied access to prisoners for a prescribed period. A 1986
	Amnesty International report alleged widespread physical
	mistreatment of security detainees, specifically citing the
	case of Adnan Mansour Ghanem, who was allegedly beaten severely
	before being deported. The Israeli judge at Ghanem 's
	deportation trial noted physical evidence of beating.
	 
	d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile
	 
	Persons arrested for common crimes in the occupied territories
	are usually provided the opportunity for bail, access to an
	attorney, and a clear statement of charges, although these
	rights are sometimes delayed. Individuals may be held in
	administrative detention without formal charges for up to 18
	days. The normal detention period after charges are filed is
	60 days before trial. This can be extended indefinitely by a
	Supreme Court judge for 3-month periods.
	 
	Persons held for security reasons are not allowed bail and
	initially are denied access to counsel or other outside
	contact. Officials sometimes have declined to confirm
	detentions to consular officers. Under Israeli law, denial of
	notification of arrest to a third party can be extended for up
	to 15 days. Many who are released without charges claim
	ignorance of the reasons for their detention. Detainees are
	prevented from seeing their attorneys for 18 days, but access
	may be denied indefinitely for security reasons or because
	granting access may impede the investigation.
	 
	Arabs are often detained, sometimes in sizable numbers, after
	terrorist incidents or demonstrations. Such detentions
	usually do not result in formal charges and are not prolonged.
	Persons arrested during demonstrations are tried in military
	courts on security grounds. Security forces can and do detain
	individuals without prompt notification of their relatives and
	apparently without the use of warrants.
	 
	The use of 6-month administrative detention and deportation
	continued in 1986. The United States has indicated that these
	measures are inconsistent with the Fourth Geneva Convention.
	During 1986, at least 32 Palestinians were placed under
	administrative detention, which requires confirmation by a
	military judge. The hearing is confidential and the detainee
	and counsel can be denied access to evidence cited as grounds
	for the detention if the judge determines that confidentiality
	is required for security reasons. This can be challenged in
	the Supreme Court .
	 
	At least one Palestinian who had been released in a 1985
	exchange of prisoners held in Israel for Israeli military
	personnel captured in Lebanon was deported by Israel, which
	claimed he was not entitled to residency status. The ICRC,
	which had helped negotiate the original exchange, objected.
	Israel maintained that those who had reentered Israel illegally
	had forfeited their residency rights; the ICRC disagreed.
	 
	In November the Palestinian editor of the Jerusalem newspaper,
	Asha'ab, was ordered deported because of his alleged
	association with Fatah, the PLCs largest faction. Israel did
	not claim that he was personally involved in terrorism. The
	order initially was appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court,
	which directed the authorities to justify their action. The
	appeal was later withdrawn and the editor deported. At least
	eight other Palestinians were deported for alleged security
	offenses. Several individuals who appealed the deportation
	orders to the Supreme Court withdrew their appeals when the
	Court refused, on security grounds, their attorneys' request
	to review the evidence against them.
	 
	In 1986 at least 62 Arabs were placed under new or renewed
	orders restricting them to their towns for 3 months or more.
	Such orders do not require formal charges and are made by
	regional military commanders without judicial review. Many of
	those affected are political activists, outspoken critics of
	Israeli policies, or PLO supporters.
	 
	There is no forced labor in the occupied territories.
	 
	e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
	 
	Jordanian law, as modified by Israeli military orders, remains
	in force in the West Bank for most criminal and civil matters.
	British Mandatory law, as modified, prevails in Gaza. The
	 
	 
	application of these laws, except in security cases, land
	acquisition, or where jurisdiction has been transferred by
	military order, has been left in the hands of an independent
	Arab judiciary. Residents of the occupied territories accused
	of nonsecurity offenses receive public trials in local courts.
	Israeli law applies in East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
	 
	Arabs suspected of security offenses, which are not precisely
	defined under Israeli law, are normally tried in Israeli
	military courts with a military judge presiding, and are
	defended by counsel. However, Israeli residents of the
	occupied territories accused of security offenses are tried by
	the Israeli district court closest to their residence or the
	scene of their crime.
	 
	Most military trials are public, except for some cases
	involving serious security offenses, but many trials involve
	the use of secret evidence, which neither the accused nor his
	attorney can see. At the request of the defendent, the Supreme
	Court will review whether sufficient security grounds exist for
	keeping the evidence secret. Consular officers are normally
	able to attend court proceedings involving foreign citizens.
	 
	Orders of the Civil Administration may be appealed to the
	Israeli Supreme Court. Nonjudicial administrative orders of
	the military government may be appealed to area military
	commanders and the Supreme Court. Military court verdicts
	are not appealable, except on procedural grounds to the
	Supreme Court, although the area commander may exercise the
	right of commutation.
	 
	f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or
	Correspondence
	 
	Under occupation regulations, military authorities can and do
	enter private homes and institutions without prior judicial
	approval in pursuit of security objectives. A military order
	permits soldiers to search persons or premises on the West Bank
	without warrant on the suspicion that a person or organization
	may possess a proscribed publication.
	 
	In 1986 at least 15 houses of West Bank and Gaza residents
	accused of involvement in security incidents were demolished
	and 21 were sealed. Ten individual rooms were also sealed.
	Such action is usually taken before a suspect is tried.
	Houses or rooms of Israeli suspects or convicts in security
	offenses in the occupied territories were not demolished or
	sealed.
	 
	Commercial activity is often interrupted after violent
	incidents by sealing off areas for searches or by extended
	curfews. Nine shops in and adjacent to a building housing
	Jewish settlers in Hebron were cordoned off by the IDF after
	the owners refused to sell their shops. Patrons must be
	searched by soldiers before and after entering the area of the
	shops. The shopowners have filed an appeal with the Supreme
	Court .
	 
	Most Palestinians believe that mail and telephone services in
	the West Bank and Gaza are monitored. Individuals can be and
	are questioned on their political views by security officials.
	Such inquiries have in some cases involved overnight detention.
	 
	 
	 
	Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
	 
	a. Freedom of Speech and Press
	 
	Freedom of expression is generally respected, subject to
	restrictions which are deemed by Israeli authorities as
	necessary on security grounds. Proscribed acts include
	displaying the Palestinian flag, its colors, or Palestinian
	nationalist slogans, and publicly expressing support for the
	PLO. The Arabic press, most of which is located in East
	Jerusalem, is outspokenly critical of Israeli policies and
	actions. Arrests, prison sentences, land seizures, and other
	politically sensitive stories are generally reported, but
	editorials and articles are often censored in whole or in part.
	All items in Jerusalem's Arabic ]_. jess must be submitted to the
	censor for prior review, and at least 56 editorials and
	commentaries were censored in 1986. Hebrew newspapers need
	submit only articles on military security matters to the
	censors. Censorship may be challenged by appeal to the chief
	censor .
	 
	Materials licensed to be published in East Jerusalem are free
	to circulate throughout Jerusalem, but need a further license
	for distribution in the West Bank and Gaza. One Palestinian
	newspaper and one magazine have been denied such licenses.
	Military orders forbid the printing or publishing of
	politically significant material without a license. Political
	significance is not defined.
	 
	A permit must be obtained for every publication imported into
	the occupied territories. Arabic educational materials,
	periodicals, and books originating outside Israel are censored
	or banned for anti-Semitic or anti-Israeli content and for the
	encouragement of Palestinian nationalism. Since 1984 the
	number of books explicitly prohibited has been reduced from
	1,300 to 350. Possession of banned materials by West Bank or
	Gaza Arabs is a criminal offense. Usually, possession of
	illegal publications is one of a series of charges levied
	against individuals accused of security offenses. Restrictions
	of this kind are usually not applied to Israeli residents.
	 
	In August the High Court of Justice upheld permanent closure
	of two Arab Jerusalem newspapers on the grounds that they were
	funded and operated by the PFLP, which has claimed
	responsibility for terrorist actions in Israel and the occupied
	territories. The court rejected arguments by the newspapers'
	attorney that freedom of expression should protect the
	newspapers. The U.S. -based Committee to Protect Journalists
	criticized the decision, as well as travel restrictions placed
	on several Jerusalem Arab journalists, one of whom was
	prevented from traveling to the U.S. to address an Amnesty
	International conference.
	 
	In August the authorities closed the weekly newspaper
	Al-Mawqif for 3 months after its presses were used to print
	pamphlets deemed threatening to security. They closed the
	newspaper Al-Fajr for 3 days in June and 1 week in October,
	and held up the distribution of all Arabic newspapers for
	3 days in July and for several hours during one day in August.
	They also closed the Hakawati Theatre in East Jerusalem, a
	nationalist ensemble company, four times for periods of 12 to
	24 hours, citing security reasons.
	 
	In November a teacher, who had been involved in a public
	opinion poll of Palestinians living in the occupied
	 
	territories which showed strong support for the PLO, was
	ordered by the Israeli authorities to cease teaching at
	An-Najah University because of his alleged association with
	PLO members .
	 
	Arabic-language radio and television programs from Jordan,
	Syria, and other Arab countries, including broadcasts of the
	Voice of Palestine, are received in the occupied territories
	without jamming.
	 
	Foreign journalists have not reported difficulties in meeting
	inhabitants of the occupied territories. As with reports by
	the local press, all reports filed by the foreign press are
	subject to military censorship.
	 
	b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
	 
	The Israelis have permitted a wide range of labor,
	professional, and fraternal groups organized before 1967 to
	continue to function. Professional associations are active
	and often take public stands on political issues. No political
	parties or other groups viewed as primarily political are
	permitted. Public gatherings of more than 10 people require
	permission, which is often withheld from both Arab and Israeli
	groups on grounds of public order.
	 
	There are approximately 40 labor unions in the occupied
	territories, grouped into 2 rival federations. Fifteen new
	labor unions have been permitted to register in the West Bank
	since the beginning of the occupation, but over 100
	applications have been turned down and several Arab unions have
	been disbanded by Israeli authorities for alleged security
	concerns .
	 
	West Bank unions are generally small and confined to urban
	workers in skilled craft trades. Israeli authorities must
	approve all candidates for union elections but such elections
	are held without other interference. Membership in the
	Histadrut, the Israeli national labor organization, is open to
	Arab workers from East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
	 
	In 1985 Israel first refused permission to form a union of
	Arab lawyers on the West Bank but then ordered the formation
	of such a group under the authority of the Civil
	Administration. Local lawyers have appealed to the Supreme
	Court to eliminate this order. Strikes are legal, except for
	political reasons. One union office in Nablus was closed for
	6 months on security grounds and the head of the office was
	placed under administrative detention. Some union activities,
	such as cultural exhibitions or May Day festivities, were
	prohibited on security grounds.
	 
	Israel permitted several settler groups to hold political
	rallies in the occupied territories during 1986. The Israeli
	group Peace Now was also allowed to hold a rally in Hebron,
	and the Tehiya Party was permitted to hold its party conference
	in the Kiryat Arba settlement outside Hebron. Israeli settlers
	attempted unsuccessfully to stop the Peace Now rally by
	erecting illegal road blocks, physically and verbally harassing
	participants, and assaulting some members of the Israeli
	Knesset. Although several of those involved were arrested,
	none was brought to trial.
	 
	Israeli authorities have closed universities and colleges at
	times on security grounds. The Hebron polytechnic was closed
	 
	for 1 month in April following a demonstration protesting the
	Tehiya party convention being held in Hebron. An-Najah
	University was closed temporarily in January because the
	authorities said that they were concerned that recently held
	student elections would lead to disturbances. The authorities
	also closed An-Najah twice in December on security grounds and
	Bethlehem University for 3 weeks in November on the same basis.
	One campus of Bir Zeit University was closed for most of
	December following violent clashes between students and
	security forces, and classes were disrupted by roadblocks on
	several other occasions in 1986. Roadblocks also hampered
	classes at Bethlehem University. These measures at times went
	beyond what might be reasonably justified on security grounds.
	At times university officials also called off classes because
	of concerns that student protests would occur .
	 
	c. Freedom of Religion
	 
	Freedom of religious practice exists in the occupied
	territories. No group or sect is banned on religious grounds.
	Muslim and Christian holy days are observed without hindrance,
	and Muslims and Christians operate a variety of private schools
	and institutions. There has been no reported interference with
	the publication or distribution of religious publications.
	 
	Israel protects Muslim and Christian holy places and usually
	assures freedom of access to them. On occasion, the
	authorities have denied both Arab and Jewish groups access to
	religious sites on religious or security grounds. In January
	and February 1986, some members of the Israeli Knesset created
	disturbances on the Temple Mount, which is the third holiest
	site in Islam and is the former site of the Jewish Temple.
	Israeli government spokesmen criticized the disturbances, and
	there were no changes in the system under which Islamic
	authorities administer the area.
	 
	Israel facilitates travel into Jordan for Muslims making the
	pilgrimage (the hajj) to Mecca by expediting bridge clearance
	procedures and extending the hours of operation of the bridges.
	In 1986 several thousand pilgrims from the occupied territories
	made the hajj. At least 20 were refused permission on security
	grounds .
	 
	d. Freedom of Movement Within the Country, Foreign
	Travel, Emigration, and Repatriation
	 
	Freedom of movement is generally unrestricted for Arabs within
	the occupied territories, but some restrictions exist.
	Approximately 80,000 Arabs travel daily to Israel to work.
	All residents over 16 must carry identity documents and show
	them to security officials whenever requested. Arab vehicles
	are often stopped for security checks, sometimes at
	unauthorized roadblocks by Israeli settlers. Palestinians
	resident in the territories need permits to remain overnight
	in Israel; West Bankers and Gazans are generally forbidden to
	remain in Jerusalem after midnight, but the rule is not always
	rigorously enforced.
	 
	Following violent incidents, curfews lasting several hours to a
	day are often imposed in the surrounding area. At least four
	West Bank towns and five refugee camps were placed under curfew
	at least once during 1986.
	 
	Most inhabitants of the occupied territories are permitted to
	travel abroad and many thousands do so each year. Exit visas
	 
	are required. Many residents of the West Bank are Jordanian
	citizens and use Jordanian passports for travel to or through
	Jordan. Israel issues laissez passers to residents of the
	occupied territories to facilitate foreign travel from ports
	and airports in Israel after a security check. In some cases,
	restrictions are imposed on reentry. Travel bans are also
	imposed on some persons suspected of, but not charged with,
	antioccupation activities. Bans on the travel of residents of
	particular areas have been used by Israeli security forces as
	a form of collective punishment. In October, following the
	hand-grenade attack in Jerusalem in which 1 Israeli was killed
	and 70 injured, a total travel ban was imposed on all West
	Bankers crossing the bridge. The ban was partially lifted
	after 1 week but remained in force for all residents under the
	age of 40 until mid-December. Despite the formal state of war
	between Israel and Jordan, two-way travel between the West Bank
	and Jordan is permitted. Palestinians returning from Jordan,
	as well as other Arabs and persons of Arab descent, regardless
	of citizenship, are all subject to search, and many complain of
	unnecessarily harsh or humiliating treatment and harassment.
	Israel permitted all members of the Jordanian Parliament
	resident in the West Bank to travel freely to attend
	parliamentary sessions during 1986.
	 
	There are no obstacles to emigration. Israel sometimes
	refuses to renew the laissez passers of West Bank residents
	who study or work abroad for a period of time on the ground
	that they have abandoned their residence, even though they
	have not acquired foreign citizenship. Such persons are
	permitted to return to the West Bank as tourists only, and are
	sometimes denied any right to return. Entry permits or
	residency rights are often denied to spouses and children
	solely because the head of the household has emigrated.
	Israel also has not permitted the return of many former West
	Bank residents who were not present in the territories, for
	whatever reason, at the time a census was taken in late 1967
	by Israeli authorities.
	 
	Gazans normally do not recjuire prior approval for travel to
	the West Bank. Under special arrangements concluded between
	Israel and Egypt, thousands of Gazans regularly cross into
	Egypt, particularly to work or visit relatives in the divided
	city of Rafah. Israel permits Golan Heights Druze to return
	after attending school in Syria; it has not, however, permitted
	the return of other Syrians who fled or were expelled from the
	area during and after the 1967 war.
	 
	Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens
	to Change Their Government
	 
	There is no regional self-government in the territories. At
	the municipal level, Arab civil servants, institutions, and
	municipal officials operate under the military government.
	Most villages retain their traditional leadership. No
	Palestinian political parties or overtly political
	organizations are permitted.
	 
	Municipal elections were last held in 1976. A few elected
	mayors have continued to hold office. Others were dismissed
	and replaced by Israeli officials. In December 1985, a
	Palestinian, the last duly elected deputy mayor and elected
	head of the Chamber of Commerce, was appointed mayor of Nablus,
	but he was later assassinated, at which time his deputy took
	over as acting mayor. In October 1986, Arab mayors were
	appointed to replace Israeli officials in Ramallah, Al-Bireh,
	and Hebron. With these appointments, all major West Bank
	municipalities now have Arab mayors. Bethlehem and Tulkarm
	are the only major towns governed by elected Arab mayors. Arab
	residents of East Jerusalem are permitted and encouraged to
	vote in municipal elections. Approximately 20 percent did so
	in the 1983 elections.
	 
	Most Arab residents of the West Bank are Jordanian citizens
	and as such are represented by 2 senators and 30 members of
	the Jordanian Parliament. Although Jordan has held regular
	parliamentary elections, Israel has not permitted the holding
	of similar elections in the West Bank since 1967.
	 
	Section 4 Governmental Attitude Regarding International and
	 
	Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations
	of Human Rights
	 
	A variety of local groups, both Israeli and Palestinian, are
	concerned with human rights issues. Publications and
	statements from these groups are allowed to circulate in the
	occupied territories. Arab and Israeli human rights groups
	increased their coordination in 1986.
	 
	Israel normally permits international human rights groups to
	visit the occupied territories, and does not interfere with
	their investigations. A Palestinian field investigator for
	Law in the Service of Man, the West Bank affiliate of the
	International Commission of Jurists, who was placed under
	administrative arrest in September 1985 on security grounds,
	was released in March 1986.
	 
	Section 5 Discrimination Based on Race, Sex, Religion,
	Language, or Social Status
	 
	Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza are subject to
	laws and regulations of the Israeli military government.
	However, Jewish settlers residing in these areas are subject
	to Israeli law, jurisdiction, and administration, as applied
	to Israeli nationals residing in Israel. Therefore, on a
	broad range of issues, including the right to due process,
	acquisition and loss of residency, freedom of movement, land
	use, and access to social services, Palestinians in the West
	Bank and Gaza are treated differently and usually less
	favorably than Jewish settlers in the same areas. Israel has
	declared that Israeli law applies to all inhabitants of East
	Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
	 
	The use of land by Israeli authorities for Israeli settlements,
	military purposes, road projects, and other means by which
	access is restricted significantly affects the lives and
	economic activities of Palestinians. Palestinians are excluded
	from the Higher Planning Council which draws up plans for land
	use in the occupied territories. In 1971 the military
	government issued an order transferring authority from local
	municipal and village councils to the Higher Planning Council.
	Government planning bodies, military officials, and Israeli
	settlers are represented on the Council.
	 
	The authorities have discriminated against the Palestinian
	population in the use of a substantial portion of the land in
	the occupied territories which is under government control.
	Approximately 5 percent of the land to which Palestinian access
	has been restricted has been turned over to Jewish Israeli
	settlers for residential, agricultural, or industrial use.
	Israeli settlements receive large annual subsidies in various
	forms from the Government of Israel and Israelis receive
	inducements to take up residence in the settlements.
	Indigenous Palestinians have not been offered the use of land
	under Israeli control on the same basis as Israeli settlers,
	nor have they received special assistance from the Israeli
	authorities to encourage them to remain in the territories.
	 
	During the early and midsummer, approximately 100 American
	citizens of Palestinian origin arriving as visitors had their
	passports impounded at Israeli points of entry enroute to the
	occupied territories, were given visas of shorter duration
	than normal, and several were made to post bonds of $2,000 to
	$3,000. Israeli authorities asserted that this was done only
	in cases in which entrants were expected to stay indefinitely
	and was not intended to be discriminatory. The practice
	appeared to end by late summer.
	 
	The West Bank is served by four universities, one college, one
	community college, and a variety of other educational
	institutions, all established or upgraded since the beginning
	of the Israeli occupation. However, none of the universities
	receives financial support or other assistance from the
	occupation authorities. Palestinian teachers at educational
	institutions in the occupied territories must receive
	certificates from the Israeli authorities, the issuance of
	which is based on security and political criteria, as well as
	professional competence.
	 
	The Israeli-occupied portion of the Golan Heights consists
	of 1,295 square kilometers, and has an Arab population of
	about 15,000, mostly Druze and a small percentage of
	Alawites. Approximately 7,500 Israeli settlers live in some
	32 settlements in the Golan Heights. Druze village councils
	have complained that they do not receive sufficient funding to
	provide minimal municipal services, and a third of the
	estimated 4,000 school children are reported to be studying in
	substandard classrooms.
	 
	Urban West Bankers are increasingly sophisticated in their
	social attitudes, including toward the role of women, but the
	rural majority continues to hold more traditional social
	values. There are no legal or administrative prohibitions on
	the employment of women in the occupied territories, although
	traditional cultural mores and family commitments limit most
	to homemaking. Most Palestinian women holding jobs outside
	their homes reside and work in urban areas. Employment of
	women is concentrated in service industries, education, and
	health services, with a small number working in journalism,
	law, and other professions.
	 
	Although women legally have equal access to public education,
	custom and family pressures limit the number of women in West
	Bank schools. Even so, female school enrollment is quite high
	by Middle Eastern standards. A little over 45 percent of the
	primary and secondary school students are female. While female
	enrollment at the postsecondary level varies between roughly
	30 to 45 percent at coeducational West Bank colleges and
	universities, a number of teacher and vocational training
	centers are all male or all female.
	 
	There is a wide range of women's cooperative groups for health
	care, child care, handicraft production, vocational training.
	 
	and other services. The West Bank-wide Society for the
	Preservation of the Family is active in supporting women's
	needs .
	 
	CONDITIONS OF LABOR
	 
	Working conditions in the West Bank are governed by the
	Jordanian labor law of 1960 which provides for a maximum
	workweek of 48 hours, except for hotel, food service, and
	cinema employees whose workweek is 54 hours. There is no
	minimum wage. Child labor is not permitted. Histadrut, the
	Israeli national labor organization, has taken steps to assure
	that working conditions for Golan Druze and residents of East
	Jerusalem are comparable to those of Israelis.