Dokument #1311485
IRB – Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (Autor)
The following information is in addition to
that found in GTM31395.FE of 5 March 1999.
In a 6 May 1999 telephone interview with
the Research Directorate, the general coordinator for the Alliance
of Young Indigenous Conscientious Objectors of the National
Coordination of Guatemalan Widows (CONAVIGUA) in Guatemala City
stated that by law, the Military Code establishes the death penalty
as a penalty for desertion during times of war, however, in
practice, this penalty has not been imposed for several years.
According to the general coordinator, a soldier who had deserted
the Armed Forces in 1993 and then fled to Mexico in exile was
assassinated upon his return home to the Department of
Huehuetenango in 1994. He stated that this was the most recent case
of a deserter being killed, but could not provide any additional
information on this case.
Since the signing of the Peace Accords in
December 1996, the general coordinator has not heard of any cases
where deserters faced problems upon returning to Guatemala.
The director of the Training Program for
Public Defence (Proyecto de Capacitación de la Defensa) at
the Institute of Comparative Studies in Penal Sciences (Instituto
de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales) in Guatemala City
provided the following information during a 10 May 1999 telephone
interview.
Currently, there are no known cases of
persons who had deserted the Armed Forces being prosecuted in
Guatemala and the authorities do not seek deserters out.
It is difficult to generalize on the
possible outcome of someone who had deserted because other factors
could result in prosecution. Although, the issue of desertion is
not covered under the Law of National Reconciliation, some types of
war-related violent acts are. For example, soldiers who had
committed torture and extrajudicial executions against unarmed
civilians during the civil war are excluded from the protection of
the law's amnesty, whereas, soldiers who fought against armed
guerrillas are protected from prosecution.
This Response was prepared after
researching publicly accessible information currently available to
the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is
not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any
particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Please find below the
list of additional sources consulted in researching this
Information Request.
References
Alliance of Young Indigenous
Conscientious Objectors, Guatemala City. 7 May 1999. Telephone
interview with the general coordinator.
Instituto de Estudios Comparados en
Ciencias Penales, Guatemala City. 10 May 1999. Telephone interview
with the director of Training Program for Public Defence.
Additional Sources Consulted
Central America NewsPak
[Austin]. 1999.
Central America Report
[Guatemala City]. 1999.
Cerigua Weekly Briefs
[Guatemala City]. 1999.
Guatemala Human Rights Update
[Washington]. 1999.
La Prensa [San Pedro Sula].
1999.
Latinamerica Press [Lima].
1999.
Latin America Regional Reports:
Caribbean and Central America Report [London]. 1999.
Electronic sources: IRB Databases,
LEXIS/NEXIS, Internet, REFWORLD and WNC.
The treatment a person would receive today in Guatemala if he was forcibly recruited in the Armed Forces in 1984 and served 4 months before deserting (1999) [GTM31626.E] (Anfragebeantwortung, Französisch)