Societal attitudes toward a foreign Christian woman who is married to a Muslim man, including reports of forced conversions to Islam of Christian women who are married to Muslim men by family in Pakistan [PAK42422.E]

According to a news report by Nawa-i-Waqt, an Urdu newspaper published out of Rawalpindi, "[t]he Christian community of Pakistan has very good relations with the Muslim majority" (7 Sept. 2000). However, The Seattle Times reported that according to Christian leaders, the Christian community "has been tolerated as long as its members stayed within their community, married among themselves and accepted the most menial jobs such as sweeping streets" (29 Oct. 2001). For additional information on the situation of Christians in Pakistan please refer the to International Religious Freedom Report 2003 by the United States Department of State.

The following information on societal attitudes toward a foreign Christian woman who is married to a Muslim man, in Pakistan, was provided to the Research Directorate, in correspondence from the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP):

In most cases, a foreign Christian woman [who is] married to a Pakistani man would not face severe social discrimination. In most cases, such matches are generally acceptable. However, the woman could have difficulties adjusting within Pakistani society, in terms of language, cultural norms etc. - as much as would be the case for most people attempting to adapt to a totally different culture. It is also possible that if she is married to a man from a family who holds orthodox beliefs, she could face discrimination from her in-laws etc. (5 Mar. 2004).

A Lahore-based human rights lawyer, who has been elected Chairperson of the HRCP twice, who was "instrumental in the formation of Punjab Women Lawyers Association" and the Women Action Forum, and who "was one of the leading figures in the campaign waged by the women activists against the promulgation of the controversial Hadood Ordinance and Family Laws," provided the following information in correspondence to the Research Directorate:

In my experience there is no obvious bias against a foreign Christian wife in Pakistan. However, if there are differences in the marriage these prejudices surface. In a number of custody cases, non-Muslim foreign women are subjected to humiliating treatment in court. Wild allegations are made against them and they are painted as promiscuous women simply because they are not Muslims. Courts do not discourage such humiliation (5 Mar. 2004).

In an opinion piece published by Dawn, the author explains that by virtue of verse 5:5, the Quran "confirms" that Muslim males are permitted to marry a Jewish or Christian woman "without converting her to Islam" (12 Apr. 2002). This information was corroborated by the HRCP in correspondence to the Research Directorate (5 Mar. 2004). However, in its annual report that was published in May 2003, Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW), a "human rights charity working on behalf of those persecuted for their Christian beliefs, [and] promot[ing] religious liberty for all" (CSW n.d.), identified "[f]orced conversion of non-Muslims to Islam [as] ... a concern" in Pakistan (CSW May 2003, 24).

According to correspondence from the HRCP,

Although ... conversion to Islam is not strictly necessary for a Christian woman wedding a Muslim man, as such marriages are permissible in Islam, the norm practiced is for the woman to 'convert'. This usually means little more than the adoption of a 'Muslim' name, which is used on her marriage registration documents (Nikahnama). As such, someone called 'Mary' is often known as 'Maryam' on her nikahnama etc.
The matter of whether this name is used in everyday life depends entirely on the woman herself, the husband and possibly the family. There may also be some pressure from clerics conducting [the] marriage to use a Muslim name and make a 'conversion', but this is usually no more than cosmetic.
However, if a family, or the woman's husband, is particularly orthodox in terms of beliefs and practices, they could insist that if she has converted, she also follow Islamic practices. This however would depend entirely on individual families.
The existing law does not force conversions on Christian women wedding Muslim men, though by custom and in practice a name change and kind of 'cosmetic' conversion is very often made (5 Mar. 2004).

On the issue of forced conversion to Islam of Christian women who are married to Muslim men, the Lahore-based human rights lawyer said that "[t]here are a number of reports of forced conversion of Hindu and Christian women who marry or are abducted by Muslim men. It is common to pressure a non-Muslim wife to convert to being a Muslim" (5 Mar. 2004). Similarly, the Research Directorate found several news reports of forced conversion of non-Muslim women, including of Christian women, after having been raped, and forced to marry their rapists or sold into prostitution (CSW 2 May 2003, 21; The Washington Times 7 Oct. 2000; HRWF 22 May 2003; International Religious Freedom Report 2003 18 Dec. 2003).

This Response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Please find below the list of additional sources consulted in researching this Information Request.

References


Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW). n.d. "A Voice For the Voiceless." http://www.csw.org.uk/index.asp [Accessed 2 Mar. 2004]

_____. May 2003. Pakistan Annual Report 2002. http://www.csw.org.uk/country%20reports%2003/Pakistan%20AR%202003.pdf [Accessed 1 Mar. 2004]

Dawn [Karachi]. 12 April 2002. Haider Zaman. "Tolerance in Islam." http://www.dawn.com/2002/04/12/op.htm [Accessed 1 Mar. 2004]

Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP). 5 March 2004. Correspondence from the Joint Director.

Human Rights Without Frontiers (HRWF). 22 May 2003. Edited by Willy Fautre. "Pakistan: Nine-Year-Old Christian Girl Sexually Assaulted as Punishment for War in Iraq." http://www.hrwf.net [Accessed 22 May 2003]

International Religious Freedom Report for 2003. 18 December 2003. United States Department of State. Washington, DC. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2003/24473.htm [Accessed 4 Mar. 2004]

Lawyer, Lahore. 5 March 2004. Correspondence.

Nawa-i-Waqt [Rawalpindi, in Urdu]. 7 September 2000. "Analyst Views Pak Religious Schools, Minorities in India." (FBIS-NES-2000-0911 18 Sept. 2000/Dialog)

The Seattle Times. 29 October 2001. Samson Mulugeta. "Pakistani Christians 'Feel Like Third-Class Citizens'." (NEXIS)

The Washington Times. 7 October 2000. Ben Barber. "Christians in Pakistan Live in Fear." (NEXIS)

Additional Sources Consulted


The Centre for Christian-Muslim Relations, in North Turramurra, Australia, did not respond to a letter requesting information.

HOPE International Development Agency, in New Westminister, British Columbia.

The Pakistan Women Lawyers' Association (PAWLA), in Karachi, did not respond to a letter requesting information.

Unsuccessful attempts to contact the Centre for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS), in Lahore.

Unsuccessful attempts to contact the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Karachi and the Archdiocese of Lahore, as well as the Roman Catholic Diocese of Hyderabad and the Diocese of Islamabad-Rawalpindi.

Unsuccessful attempts to contact the Shirkat Gah: Women's Resource Centre, in Lahore.

Internet sites, including: Amnesty International (AI), BBC, The Daily Times, Dialog/WNC, European Country of Origin Information Network (ECOI), Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), Human Rights Watch (HRW), International Christian Concern (ICC), Pakistan Christian Post, PakTribune.

Verknüpfte Dokumente

Wir führen eine Nutzer·innenbefragung durch und währen dankbar, wenn Sie sich die Zeit nehmen könnten, uns zu helfen ecoi.net zu verbessern.

Die Umfrage dauert ca. 7-15 Minuten.

Klicken Sie hier: zur Umfrage... Danke!

ecoi.net-Umfrage 2025