Dokument #2129832
International Crisis Group (Autor)
Once again, leaders of the majority-Serb entity Republika Srpska are threatening to break away from Bosnia. While tensions between the entity and Sarajevo are longstanding, national collapse may be closer than ever before.
Bosnia and Herzegovina (or Bosnia) is facing a critical test of its ability to survive intact as a state. Its two main factions – Republika Srpska (RS), the smaller of its two ethnically divided parts, and the central government in Sarajevo – are in a steadily escalating confrontation, with RS threatening to secede. The country’s international supervisor, High Representative Christian Schmidt, is arguably making the crisis worse by using his office’s executive power to ward off the threat of a breakup. His office was created under the Dayton Accords – the peace deal inked in 1995 that brought an end to the country’s civil war. For more than a decade, RS President Milorad Dodik has probed and tested the authority of the Bosnian state through a mix of incendiary rhetoric and carefully calibrated defiance, enacting separatist laws and then quietly shelving them, aiming all the time to chisel away at Sarajevo’s authority while avoiding provoking a strong U.S. or EU response. This time around, however, Dodik will be hard pressed to walk back from the clash of powers.
In large part, that is because Dodik’s defiance of the high representative has culminated in a court conviction that could lead to his arrest, potentially spurring his allies in RS to make a more definitive break with the central government. In February, Bosnia’s state court – which was established by a previous high representative – convicted Dodik of violating a law that made it a crime to fail to obey Schmidt’s edicts. (High Representative Schmidt imposed this law in reaction to a law from RS in 2023 that sought to block his authority on its territory.) Dodik and other RS leaders reject Schmidt’s writ and have called him a “German tourist”. The court sentenced Dodik to one year in prison and banned him from politics for six years, though those punishments are suspended as he appeals; a final judgment is expected later in the year. Meanwhile, the RS National Assembly responded to the verdict by passing laws that edge them halfway to independence. On 26 March, the Bosnian state court in turn announced it was seeking an international arrest warrant for Dodik and two other high-ranking RS officials.
While Dodik and his party have long campaigned for separation from Bosnia and unification with Serbia, their actions suggest that is probably not what they are seeking on this occasion. In the past, they have threatened to boycott Bosnian state institutions and withdraw from the joint armed forces – key steps toward establishing RS as a separate state – but in general they have not followed through with those incendiary moves. Within the RS leadership, the realisation has dawned that making secession work is very hard. Few, if any, countries are likely to recognise a breakaway state. That is particularly true for RS, which is divided into two separate parts by the Brčko district – a strategically vital multi-ethnic region belonging to both parts of Bosnia, but which governs itself. In addition, RS already has a higher degree of autonomy than any other subnational unit in Europe, with its own legislature, courts and police, and a de facto veto over the central government’s decision-making. Rather than gamble it all on a probably doomed bid for independence, the RS leadership likely hopes its actions can cement and extend its self-governing prerogatives.
This approach has a name: returning to the “original Dayton Accords”.
Negotiated by the administration of U.S. President Bill Clinton, the Dayton agreement ended Bosnia’s war but left the country’s central government too weak to survive for long. An annex to the text was a constitution that divided the country into two entities: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and RS. These entities were to be governed from the national capital, Sarajevo, by a bicameral parliament and a three-person collective presidency comprising one Bosniak, one Croat and one Serb member. The national government had limited powers, while the subnational entities were responsible for justice, most policing, taxation, education, health care, defence and security. Another annex provided for an international high representative to coordinate implementation of the agreement’s civilian aspects.
That framework soon made for a failing state, however. RS mounted a systematic campaign of obstruction and Serbs boycotted the state presidency and other common institutions. Refugees could not safely go home or reclaim their property. The police and armed forces employed war criminals. The region risked sliding back into armed conflict.
In response, at a meeting held in Bonn, Germany, in 1997, the Peace Implementation Council (PIC) – a group of 55 states and agencies helping manage the peace process – endowed the high representative with broad governing authority (known as the Bonn powers). Over the next several years, successive high representatives used these powers with increasing effect, transforming the country. They removed and appointed leaders; amended both entities’ constitutions; and enacted important laws, including one that created a state court – which sentenced Dodik in February. High representatives relied on the NATO-led peacekeeping mission and on the backing of heavyweights on the PIC’s Steering Board, notably the U.S., France, Germany, Italy, Russia and the UK. Bosnia’s Constitutional Court reinforced these changes and added some of its own.
The Serb and Croat minorities, jointly representing about half the population of Bosnia, have resented this rule by international fiat. Indeed, the system that emerged out of the Dayton Accords and the Bonn powers has arguably lasted too long. Foreign judges on Bosnia’s Constitutional Court have joined with Bosniak judges to push through controversial rulings, such as finding that state property belongs to Bosnia, rather than the subnational entities, and ruling that RS’s national holiday violates the constitution. RS leaders allege that the combination of high representatives, foreign judges and meddling diplomats has conspired to deprive the entities of many of the powers they were given under the Dayton Accords. The state court, for example, has the power to try many of the same crimes as the entities’ courts, in addition to infractions such as genocide denial (when “carried out in a manner likely to incite to violence or hatred”). This, RS officials say, is depriving them of self-determination. Under Dodik’s leadership, RS is trying not only to expel the high representative but also to roll back most or all of his predecessors’ interventions. The state court is a leading target, along with the Constitutional Court’s rulings on state property.
Leaders of RS have also led an offensive against the high representative, with the entity’s National Assembly passing a series of laws that push back forcefully against the office’s powers in the aftermath of Dodik’s conviction. One law denies the jurisdiction of four vital Bosnian authorities, all of which were created by previous high representatives: the court and prosecutor’s office that indicted and convicted Dodik; the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council that supervises the judiciary; and the State Investigation and Prosecution Agency, the closest Bosnia comes to state-level law enforcement. It also bans officials of these bodies from operating on RS territory. A second law creates a Judicial and Prosecutorial Council for RS, with members directly appointed by the entity’s parliament as well as by its courts and prosecutors’ offices, boosting the regional government’s influence over judges. The third law requires RS citizens who serve as Bosnian officials to carry out policy set by the RS National Assembly. Taken together, these steps deprive the Bosnian state of much of its authority over RS without crossing the line into overt secession.
Dodik’s presumption appears to have been that he could count on unprecedented international support for his latest campaign against the high representative. But even amid the current geopolitical turbulence, there is no certainty that foreign powers will give him the backing he longs for. Dodik has aligned himself with U.S. President Donald Trump, saying in December 2023 that RS would declare independence during a second Trump term. When Trump won the November 2024 election, Dodik cheered the victory, donning a “Make America Great Again” hat during a press briefing. He also hosted the president’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani in the RS capital Banja Luka the following February.
In some ways, he is entitled to believe there may be a reward for these affinities. Trump has spoken warmly of two of Dodik’s main patrons, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán (though not of Dodik himself). Dodik is also allied with Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić, who has cultivated a close relationship with members of Trump’s close circle, including U.S. Special Envoy Richard Grenell, the U.S. president’s son Donald Trump Jr. and his son-in-law Jared Kushner. That said, it was notable that on 7 March U.S. Secretary of State and now acting National Security Advisor Marco Rubio sharply rebuked Dodik in a tweet, declaring that the RS leader’s actions were “undermining Bosnia and Herzegovina’s institutions and threatening its security and stability”. Sanctions Washington first imposed on Dodik in 2017 for corruption and his secessionist moves remain in place.
Signs of a possible shift in the Trump administration’s position are nevertheless becoming visible. This change is most notable in Washington’s apparent ambivalence toward the country’s international supervisors. For most of the last twenty years, the U.S. has staunchly supported the high representative and often urged him to use his Bonn powers, while the EU has pushed for restraint and called for his office to close. But that pattern has gone into reverse under Trump. At a 6 May UN Security Council session on Bosnia, the EU and its member states offered Schmidt strong support. China and Russia argued that his appointment was invalid and the post of high representative was vacant. A terse U.S. statement did not mention the Bonn powers or Schmidt by name, tilting instead toward the view espoused by Moscow and Beijing.
The Serbs also have good reason to expect the White House’s favour. Grenell, who currently serves as a special envoy for the Trump administration, worked in that capacity during Serbia and Kosovo peace negotiations from 2019-2021. He fostered friendly relations with Vučić, visiting Belgrade several times during the administration of President Joe Biden, and in 2023 the Serbian president presented Grenell with the Order of the Serbian Flag. The Trump family also has business interests in the country: Affinity Partners – Kushner’s investment firm – has secured a 99-year permit to develop a Trump International Hotel in Belgrade. Some opposition politicians have opposed the deal, in part because the Yugoslav defence ministry headquarters sat on the site before NATO bombs demolished it in 1999. When Trump, Jr. met with Vučić in Belgrade in March to talk about U.S. foreign aid to the country, some members of the opposition saw the visit as a way for the Trump family to buoy the Serbian president – and safeguard their investment.
Vučić’s standing and close relationships with people in Trump’s orbit have implications for Dodik, even if the effects have yet to be seen. The two men are close allies. When Dodik was sentenced in February, Vučić flew to Banja Luka to offer him personal support. He decried the verdict as “unlawful, anti-democratic, aimed at undermining Republika Srpska and weakening the position of the Serbian people”.
Of course, Dodik’s connections to leaders close to the Trump administration does not mean that his “original Dayton” vision will become a reality or that he will make progress toward breaking away from Bosnia. But Bosnian Serb frustrations over Sarajevo’s refusal to talk about the power of foreign officials are not going away. The increasingly provocative steps taken by RS are intended at a minimum to force Bosnia’s other leading parties – such as the predominantly Bosniak Social Democrats and the Party for Democratic Action – to come to the negotiating table to craft changes to the country’s current governing model. RS leaders accept that the negotiations would involve give-and-take and understanding of each side’s red lines, including Bosniaks’ insistence on keeping a single, viable state. That said, they would certainly press for reforms to ensure that the central state has strong Serb and Croat voices within it, RS autonomy is bolstered, and no foreigner oversees their joint government.
If that is the case, Bosnia’s Croat minority would most likely be on board for these reforms, while remaining wary of pushing the country to the breaking point. They also resent what they see as Sarajevo’s internationally abetted power grab, and they would be glad if the high representative were to go. Unlike the Serbs, however, they lack a compact territorial unit of their own. If Bosnia disintegrates, the most likely outcome would be that the Croats are left as a minority in a rump, Bosniak-dominated state. That is why Dragan Čović, the main Croat party leader, is hedging his bets, calling for respect for the state courts while maintaining his longstanding support for Dodik’s party.
Meanwhile, increasing legal and political pressure on the Serb leadership is galvanising politicians in RS and making it harder for them to back down from their separatist line. Bosnian prosecutors have opened several investigations into Dodik and two other high-ranking RS officials on the more serious charge of attacking the constitutional order. These are at an early stage, but could eventually result in more convictions and longer prison sentences. Prosecutors have already issued warrants for Dodik and two other officials to appear for questioning.
Even so, arresting the RS leader and his allies will not be straightforward. Bosnian police are unlikely to try bringing them in by force without backup from EUFOR, the small peacekeeping mission present in Bosnia with a UN mandate, which has recently been reinforced. Hungarian President Orbán briefly sent a detachment of special police to RS, reportedly to escort Dodik safely out of the country if the court tries to arrest him. But even if Dodik is sent to prison or leaves the country, the end of his long career – his first term as RS prime minister was in 1999 – would not resolve Bosnia’s simmering political conflicts. No Serb successor is likely to accept the high representative’s authority either, and support in RS for greater autonomy and, potentially, secession remains strong.
There are only a few ways out of this deadlock. RS could revoke its laws challenging the authority of the central state and the high representative, which would be humiliating. Bosnian state officials could call their bluff and try to arrest Dodik and other leaders, risking unrest and possibly further radicalising RS. Or the leaders of Bosnia’s main parties from across the country’s ethnic divides could agree to start talks on a post-Dayton model without international supervision. This last, most promising option has yet to come to fruition, in part because there are major hurdles to reaching a deal. The disagreement between Banja Luka and Sarajevo over the state’s authority and decision-making procedures runs deep, and most major parties on both sides hold equally intransigent views.
In the past, outsiders have helped mediate compromises that temper hostilities between the sides. This task is now harder, in large part because of growing divisions between the EU, which is clinging to the status quo, and the Trump administration, which appears to have tired of Bosnia’s system of international supervision and forged closer ties to the Serbs. While outside rule and peacekeeping may be reaching their expiry date 30 years after Dayton, it is nonetheless hard to see how the country moves forward without foreign pressure to force the hard choices that must be made. The EU, for example, could wield financial aid, market access and eventual membership for Bosnia, which is currently in accession talks, as incentives to craft a deal; these could be leveraged to encourage a political compromise. The Trump administration could try to mediate a deal, as it did (though with limited success) between Kosovo and Serbia in 2020. Distracted and divided or not, Brussels and Washington could prevent more problems down the road by acting now. Otherwise, Bosnia’s survival as a united state will continue to depend on decisions that its leaders cannot or will not make.