Political Rights | 22 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 39 / 60 |
Papua New Guinea (PNG) has a parliamentary system in which elections are held regularly, but the polls have often been marred by irregularities and violence. Party allegiances are unstable, and only two governments have survived for a full term since independence in 1975. Over the past two decades, a boom in mineral resources extraction has helped successive incumbent governments to consolidate more control. The judiciary retains significant independence, and the media are mostly free to criticize the government. Corruption remains a serious problem.
- Sessions of parliament were dominated by the opposition maneuvering to oust Prime Minister James Marape’s government, and government efforts to block such a challenge. In September Marape survived a no-confidence challenge, with 75 lawmakers voting in favor of retaining him and 32 voting against. No-confidence votes are frequent in the country, often taking place after an 18-month “grace period” following general elections expires.
- Local elections were delayed from July to September, and then delayed again until April 2025. Authorities said the delay to 2025 was necessary because there were not enough civil servants to hold polls and the long-delayed national census concurrently. The census began in June.
- The fifth draft of a proposed media law was released in July. The draft included provisions allowing authorities to investigate complaints against outlets, issue guidelines for ethical reporting, and sanction journalists deemed to violate professional standards. The document drew condemnation from Papua New Guinean journalists and local and regional press freedom groups.
- Instances of serious tribal violence took place during the year. In February, more than 70 people were reportedly killed in tribal fighting in Enga Province. In July, 26 people were reportedly killed in clashes in Angoram, East Sepik Province. Separately, Marape declared a two-week state of emergency in Port Moresby in January, in response to violent protests that started after police and other public servants walked off the job in response to unexpected pay cuts. At least 16 people were reportedly killed amid the unrest.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 2 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 1 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 2 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 2 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 0 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 1 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 4 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 3 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 3 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 1 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2 / 4 |