Political Rights | 28 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 34 / 60 |
Nepal’s elections are competitive and credible, with parties and citizens largely committed to democratic processes. The country’s anticorruption authority has been active in pursuing official misconduct, though corruption persists. Journalists and civil society face some restrictions, while gender-based violence, underage marriage, and bonded labor remain problems.
- In May, Kantipur Media Group chair Kailash Sirohiya was arrested over allegations of holding multiple citizenships, which is prohibited by Nepalese law, and held for nine days. Kathmandu Post editor Biswas Baral told the US-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) that Sirohiya was not questioned or permitted an opportunity to produce valid documents. Local and international press freedom advocates expressed concern over the arrest, with a CPJ representative saying it “appears to be an effort to muzzle the critical reporting of Nepal’s largest media group.”
- There were several reported instances of Christians experiencing police or other harassment. In March, four Nepali and seven Australian Christians were detained by police in Terai on what local Christian leaders described as trumped-up allegations of engaging in forced conversions. The Australian nationals were held for three days and either asked to leave Nepal or were deported, according to media reports; the Nepalis were reportedly detained for three weeks and would face trial for proselytizing, which is legally prohibited.
- In April, hundreds of promonarchy Rastriya Prajatantra Party (RPP) supporters protesting against corruption and the republic system clashed with police, who were reportedly trying to prevent them from entering restricted areas around government buildings. State authorities employed water cannons and beat protesters with bamboo batons, while some protesters threw stones at police. No major injuries were reported, but the events were seen as a departure from a norm of more peaceful assembly and less heavy-handed state responses.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 4 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 3 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 3 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 2 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 3 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 1 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 2 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 2 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 2 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 3 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 2 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 1 / 4 |