Political Rights | 25 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 35 / 60 |
The numerical scores and status listed above do not reflect conditions in Transnistria, which is examined in a separate report. Freedom in the World reports assess the level of political rights and civil liberties in a given geographical area, regardless of whether they are affected by the state, nonstate actors, or foreign powers. Disputed territories are sometimes assessed separately if they meet certain criteria, including boundaries that are sufficiently stable to allow year-on-year comparisons. For more information, see the report methodology and FAQ.
Moldova has a competitive electoral environment, and freedoms of assembly, speech, and religion are mostly protected. Nonetheless, pervasive corruption, links between major political figures and powerful economic interests, and critical deficiencies in the justice sector and the rule of law all hamper democratic governance.
- Incumbent president Maia Sandu was reelected in a presidential poll that took place in October and November, winning 55 percent of the second-round vote over Alexandr Stoianoglo, who took 45 percent. Sandu favored Moldova’s integration with the European Union (EU) and had backed a constitutional referendum indicating it as a priority; Stoianoglo was supported by Moldova’s socialist party, which was viewed as aligned with the Russian Federation. Stoianoglo had stated that he would work toward EU integration while also improving relations with Russia, and had opposed the constitutional referendum.
- An Organization for Co-operation and Security in Europe (OSCE) monitoring mission found the polls well administered, but noted challenges including burdensome financial reporting requirements, limited transparency of campaign finances, misuse of public resources, and unbalanced media coverage in the incumbent’s favor. The OSCE, Moldovan officials, the EU, the United States, and other observers expressed concern about a significant election interference campaign by the Russian Federation and pro-Russian political forces, including vote-buying and disinformation schemes.
- Of more than 230 polling stations established for diaspora members, only two were opened for voting in Russia, despite a diaspora there estimated at 350,000. Moldovan authorities cited security reasons for the decision.
- The referendum on “amending the constitution with a view to Moldova’s accession to the European Union” was held concurrently with the first round of the presidential election. It passed narrowly, with 50.5 percent of voters in favor and 49.5 percent opposed.
- In July, the Moldovan Center of Legal Resources released a study detailing an environment in which journalists risk becoming ensnared in politically motivated lawsuits. The study found that legal proceedings against media are examined three times slower than other civil cases, and that in more than half of cases targeting media the main plaintiffs were politicians. The study, which examined cases against media from 2019 to 2023, found that courts dismissed 70 percent of such complaints.
- A number of serious cases of gender-based sexual violence were reported during the year, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the governmental prevention work.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because while the presidential election was deemed largely competitive, it was marred by the misuse of administrative resources, poor transparency, and a significant foreign interference effort that included vote-buying and disinformation campaigns.
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 2 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 3 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 2 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 3 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 1 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 1 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 3 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 2 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 1 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 2 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2 / 4 |