Freedom in the World 2025 - Mauritania

Partly Free
39
/ 100
Political Rights 15 / 40
Civil Liberties 24 / 60
Last Year's Score & Status
39 / 100 Partly Free
A country or territory’s Freedom in the World status depends on its aggregate Political Rights score, on a scale of 0–40, and its aggregate Civil Liberties score, on a scale of 0–60. See the methodology.
 
 

Overview

While Mauritania has experienced multiple periods of military rule, recent presidential and parliamentary elections have been relatively credible. A variety of media outlets operate, but journalists risk arrest for reporting on sensitive topics, and restrictive laws limit freedom of expression. Afro-Mauritanians, the Haratin population, women, and LGBT+ people face discrimination. The government has taken steps to address the problems of institutionalized slavery and discrimination but has also arrested activists who work on those issues.

Key Developments in 2024

  • In June, President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani was elected to a second five-year term, taking 56 percent of the vote and defeating six other candidates. Biram Dah Abeid, an antislavery activist and National Assembly member, placed second with 22 percent, while Hamadi Ould Sid’El Moctar of the Islamist party Tawassoul placed third with nearly 13 percent. Abeid rejected the results, alleging fraud, and the incumbent’s campaign was accused of using state resources to influence voters. Competition remained limited by a requirement that prospective candidates collect endorsements from at least 100 municipal council members, including at least five mayors; only Tawassoul was able to meet the threshold without selective assistance from the ruling Insaf (Equity) party. In August, President Ghazouani appointed Mokhtar Ould Diay, previously the head of the presidential office and a minister of economy and finance, as the new prime minister. Unlike his predecessor, Diay was not a member of the Haratin ethnic group.
  • Protests erupted in several cities after the election results were announced in July, leading to arrests, clashes with security forces, and at least three protester deaths in the city of Kaédi. In response, authorities imposed a mobile internet blackout that lasted for 22 days. Among other demonstrations during the year, police violently dispersed protests by students in January, farmers objecting to an allegedly unfair land redistribution plan in February, and medical interns in May.
  • Restrictive defamation laws remained an obstacle to free speech and activism. In January, the National Assembly temporarily suspended opposition lawmaker Mariem Mint Cheikh for criticizing the prime minister, and the chamber lifted Abeid’s parliamentary immunity in February following a defamation complaint from another politician. In March, Mohamed Ould Ghadda, a former senator and head of the nongovernmental organization Inclusive Transparency, was detained and accused of defamation and spreading false information after his group accused a powerful businessman’s company of corruption and mismanagement in the implementation of public contracts. In October, finance inspector Ahmed Ould Samba was dismissed from his position and detained for a month after criticizing the president on social media.
  • The Malian military and allied Russian mercenaries reportedly crossed into Mauritania in pursuit of suspected rebels in April, resulting in the deaths of several Mauritanians and injuries to others.
  • In September, the National Assembly adopted a law that would establish a single specialized court structure tasked with addressing human trafficking and migrant smuggling in addition to slavery-related crimes, effectively consolidating and reforming the country’s existing specialized courts.

This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.

For additional background information, see last year’s full report.

Political Rights

A Electoral Process

A1 0-4 pts
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 2 / 4
A2 0-4 pts
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 2 / 4
A3 0-4 pts
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 2 / 4

B Political Pluralism and Participation

B1 0-4 pts
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 2 / 4
B2 0-4 pts
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 1 / 4
B3 0-4 pts
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? 1 / 4
B4 0-4 pts
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? 1 / 4

C Functioning of Government

C1 0-4 pts
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 1 / 4
C2 0-4 pts
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 2 / 4
C3 0-4 pts
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? 1 / 4

Civil Liberties

D Freedom of Expression and Belief

D1 0-4 pts
Are there free and independent media? 2 / 4
D2 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? 2 / 4
D3 0-4 pts
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? 3 / 4
D4 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? 2 / 4

E Associational and Organizational Rights

E1 0-4 pts
Is there freedom of assembly? 2 / 4
E2 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? 1 / 4
E3 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? 2 / 4

F Rule of Law

F1 0-4 pts
Is there an independent judiciary? 1 / 4
F2 0-4 pts
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? 1 / 4
F3 0-4 pts
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? 2 / 4
F4 0-4 pts
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? 1 / 4

G Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights

G1 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? 1 / 4
G2 0-4 pts
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? 2 / 4
G3 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? 1 / 4
G4 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? 1 / 4
 

Wir führen eine Nutzer·innenbefragung durch und währen dankbar, wenn Sie sich die Zeit nehmen könnten, uns zu helfen ecoi.net zu verbessern.

Die Umfrage dauert ca. 7-15 Minuten.

Klicken Sie hier: zur Umfrage... Danke!

ecoi.net-Umfrage 2025