Freedom in the World 2025 - Madagascar

Partly Free
55
/ 100
Political Rights 21 / 40
Civil Liberties 34 / 60
Last Year's Score & Status
58 / 100 Partly Free
A country or territory’s Freedom in the World status depends on its aggregate Political Rights score, on a scale of 0–40, and its aggregate Civil Liberties score, on a scale of 0–60. See the methodology.
 
 

Overview

Malagasy politics have been unstable since the return to electoral politics in 2013, with recent elections featuring an opposition boycott and electoral irregularities. Government corruption and a lack of accountability persist. Defamation and other laws restrict press freedom. Authorities deny permits for demonstrations and have dispersed some that occurred. Lawlessness and poverty are persistent, particularly in the south.

Key Developments in 2024

  • President Andry Rajoelina’s governing coalition Isika Rehetra Miaraka amin’i (“We Are All with Andry Rajoelina,” or IRMAR) won 84 of 163 seats in the National Assembly during legislative elections in May, which were marred by fraud allegations and irregularities benefitting the bloc. The Firaisankina platform, led by former President Marc Ravalomanana, finished second with just 22 seats, and independent candidates won most of the remainder. Rajoelina reappointed Christian Ntsay, who was not a member of any of the country’s major political groupings, as prime minister in August.
  • The Safidy Electoral Observatory, the country’s main election monitor, received numerous of reports of irregularities on polling day, and opposition and independent candidates alleged widespread fraud. In a preliminary statement, the Safidy mission noted irregularities and “worrying incidents;” it further noted the distribution of money and food to voters by candidates.
  • In their official reports, both the Safidy Electoral Observatory and a Southern African Development Community (SADC) monitoring mission expressed concerns about exclusionary registration practices by electoral officials, media bias, and improper government activities during the campaign, all benefitting the ruling coalition.
  • Independent member of parliament Marie Jeanne d’Arc Masy Goulamaly was arrested two days after the legislative elections and accused of orchestrating unauthorized protests, after submitting an official complaint alleging electoral irregularities. She was held for several days before being released. Rights group Amnesty International called her arrest arbitrary.
  • A new labor code was adopted in August. The rules raised the minimum wage, clarified rules on overtime, and contained new provisions to protect workers from arbitrary dismissal and improve workplace safety standards.

This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.

For additional background information, see last year’s full report.

Political Rights

A Electoral Process

A1 0-4 pts
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 2 / 4
A2 0-4 pts
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 2 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 2 because the legislative elections were marred by reports of widespread irregularities and actions by government workers unfairly benefiting the ruling coalition.

A3 0-4 pts
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 2 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 2 because electoral bodies have applied electoral rules unevenly, to the benefit of the ruling coalition.

B Political Pluralism and Participation

B1 0-4 pts
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 2 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 2 due to authorities’ obstruction of opposition gatherings and other pressure by authorities on opposition and independent candidates.

B2 0-4 pts
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 2 / 4
B3 0-4 pts
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? 2 / 4
B4 0-4 pts
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? 2 / 4

C Functioning of Government

C1 0-4 pts
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 3 / 4
C2 0-4 pts
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 2 / 4
C3 0-4 pts
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? 2 / 4

Civil Liberties

D Freedom of Expression and Belief

D1 0-4 pts
Are there free and independent media? 2 / 4
D2 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? 3 / 4
D3 0-4 pts
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? 3 / 4
D4 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? 3 / 4

E Associational and Organizational Rights

E1 0-4 pts
Is there freedom of assembly? 2 / 4
E2 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? 3 / 4
E3 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? 3 / 4

F Rule of Law

F1 0-4 pts
Is there an independent judiciary? 2 / 4
F2 0-4 pts
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? 1 / 4
F3 0-4 pts
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? 2 / 4
F4 0-4 pts
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? 2 / 4

G Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights

G1 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? 3 / 4
G2 0-4 pts
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? 2 / 4
G3 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? 2 / 4
G4 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? 1 / 4
 

Wir führen eine Nutzer·innenbefragung durch und währen dankbar, wenn Sie sich die Zeit nehmen könnten, uns zu helfen ecoi.net zu verbessern.

Die Umfrage dauert ca. 7-15 Minuten.

Klicken Sie hier: zur Umfrage... Danke!

ecoi.net-Umfrage 2025