Political Rights | 16 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 15 / 60 |
Iraq holds regular, competitive elections, and the country’s various partisan, religious, and ethnic groups generally enjoy representation in the political system. However, democratic governance is impeded in practice by corruption, militias operating outside the bounds of the law, and the weakness of formal institutions. Increasingly, Iran’s regime has been able to influence politics in Baghdad. State officials and powerful militias routinely infringe on the rights of citizens through legal and extrajudicial means.
- After a two-year delay, legislative elections took place without major incident in the Kurdistan region in October. The two largest parties, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), won 39 and 23 seats, respectively, neither enough for a parliamentary majority.
- In August and September, Iraqi security forces clashed with medical school graduates in Baghdad protesting a lack of job opportunities, with dozens of injuries reported.
- In June, conservative politicians introduced amendments that would allow Iraqis to turn to religious courts on issues of family law. The move would effectively allow the marriage of children as young as nine years old, and weaken existing protections for women in cases of divorce. Thousands of Iraqi women gathered on several occasions to protest the proposed amendments. Separately, the parliament passed a law criminalizing same-sex relationships in April.
- The business environment continued to improve in Iraq’s major cities, with the growth of new tourism operations and other private enterprises.
- Iranian-backed groups launched several drone attacks against bases housing US troops, and the United States launched a number of attacks against Iran-backed militia headquarters in Iraq. Amid domestic tensions over the American military presence, US and Iraqi officials reached an agreement in September on a US military withdrawal in 2026.
- In January, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced that it had fired ballistic missiles at what it claimed was an Israeli spy headquarters near Erbil, the capital of Iraqi Kurdistan. The Iraqi government and local Kurdish leaders denounced the strike, which Kurdish officials said killed four civilians.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 2 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 3 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 3 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 2 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 1 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 1 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 1 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 0 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 1 / 4 |
Is the government or occupying power deliberately changing the ethnic composition of a country or territory so as to destroy a culture or tip the political balance in favor of another group? | -1 |
Are there free and independent media? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 1 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 2 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 2 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 0 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 0 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 1 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 0 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2 / 4 |
Score Change: The score improved from 1 to 2 because individuals have been able to open and operate private businesses in major cities more easily and with less harassment from nonstate actors.
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 1 / 4 |