Political Rights | 39 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 58 / 60 |
Canada has a strong history of respect for political rights and civil liberties, though in recent years citizens have been concerned about laws relating to the administration of elections, government transparency, the treatment of inmates in prisons, and restrictions on public-sector employees wearing religious symbols. While members of minority groups, including Black and Indigenous Canadians, still face discrimination and economic, social, and political challenges, the federal government has acknowledged these problems and made some moves to address them.
- In February, the government introduced Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, in Parliament. The draft legislation would define what qualifies as “harmful online content” and set up a new regulatory body to impose penalties on internet users and social media platforms for violations. The types of content that would be designated as harmful included sexual victimization of children, content used to bully a child, intimate content shared without permission, and content that promotes hatred, terrorism, violence, or extremism. Critics of the bill warned of a chill on free speech and rejected the prescribed penalties as excessive. The measure had yet to pass at the end of the year.
- In March, the government introduced another measure, Bill C-65, that would make a number of changes to Canada’s electoral framework. For example, it would increase the days, means, and locations for voting; impose new rules designed to prevent foreign entities from supporting Canadian political parties and candidates; and prohibit the impersonation of candidates using artificial intelligence tools. Bill C-65 was still under consideration as of December.
- A law adopted in April called for the creation of a permanent National Council for Reconciliation to monitor progress on the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which had concluded its examination of historical abuses against Indigenous people in 2015.
- In September, the left-wing New Democratic Party pulled out of a 2022 agreement with the ruling center-left Liberal Party that had allowed the Liberals to govern despite their lack of a majority in Parliament. As a result, the government was expected to call elections in early 2025.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 4 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 4 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 4 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 4 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 4 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 4 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 3 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 4 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 3 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 4 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 4 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 4 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 4 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 4 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 3 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 4 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 4 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 4 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 4 / 4 |