Political Rights | 6 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 9 / 60 |
President Paul Biya has ruled Cameroon since 1982. His Cameroon People’s Democratic Movement (CPDM) has maintained power by rigging elections, using state resources for political patronage, and limiting the activities of opposition parties. Freedom of expression and civil society activism are restricted, and due process safeguards are routinely violated. A conflict between security forces and separatists in the Anglophone Northwest and Southwest regions is ongoing and has resulted in widespread civilian deaths and displacements.
- The 91-year-old president generated renewed speculation about his well-being and location when he disappeared from public view for more than 40 days in September and October. During his absence, the government prohibited any media discussion about his health. In November, a Roman Catholic archbishop echoed opposition leaders in calling on Biya, without naming him, to resign and make way for a new generation. Nevertheless, the president was expected to seek reelection in 2025.
- In July, CPDM lawmakers approved a proposal by President Biya to extend their mandate and postpone legislative elections from early 2025 to March 2026. Local council elections were similarly postponed, with the government arguing that it would have been difficult to hold them in the same year as the presidential and regional council elections.
- Independent media outlets, opposition parties, and civil society organizations continued to face suspensions, bans, and harassment throughout the year, with many individual journalists, politicians, and activists subjected to arbitrary detentions and physical attacks. A trial of 17 people charged with the 2023 abduction and murder of journalist Martinez Zogo, who had recently reported on corruption allegations involving the government and a prominent businessman, remained stalled at year’s end. Also during the year, several young social media users were arrested or intimidated in reprisal for their commentary on the country’s social and political situation.
- In August, authorities in the United Kingdom charged executives from the mining company Glencore with making corrupt payments to officials in Cameroon and other West African countries in connection with oil extraction projects. Among other prominent corruption scandals, employees at the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications claimed that their performance bonuses had been embezzled for years, and the ministry responsible for state property and land issues was accused of granting enormous land concessions to individuals or companies under fraudulent circumstances.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 0 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 1 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 0 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 1 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 0 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 1 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 1 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 1 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 0 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 1 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 0 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 2 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 0 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 1 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 0 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 0 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 0 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 0 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 0 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 1 / 4 |