Political Rights | 4 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 19 / 60 |
Cambodia’s political system was dominated by the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) and leader Hun Sen for more than three decades. In 2023, Hun Sen stepped down and facilitated an undemocratic transfer of power to his son, Hun Manet, though Hun Sen effectively retains most political power in the country. While Cambodia held semicompetitive elections in the past, polls are now held in a severely repressive environment. The CPP-led government has maintained pressure on the opposition, independent media, and civil society through intimidation, politically motivated prosecutions, and violence.
- In February, the CPP won 55 of 58 Senate seats up for contest, via indirect elections by CPP loyalists in the parliament and local councils. The opposition Candlelight Party was prohibited from competing. Hun Sen was named head of the Senate, granting him even more power.
- Hun Manet fired a number of government officials early in the year, citing corruption, but the campaign never reached the heart of CPP patronage networks. In February Hun Manet named his younger brother Hun Many one of his 11 deputy prime ministers. The Diplomat reported in August that under Hun Manet, the number of secretaries and undersecretaries of state had increased by 122 percent, to “1,422 posts spread over around 30 ministries.”
- Cambodia was a hub for trafficking operations in which workers, including large numbers of foreigners, are held captive in dire conditions and forced to carry out cyberscams and other types of online crime. Authorities deny that such scam operations, which rights groups have reported to involve at least 100,000 exploited workers, exist and have obstructed and punished efforts to report on them.
- In October, authorities arrested prominent journalist Mech Dara, known for exposing the proliferating cyberscam industry and its links to powerful Cambodians, and charged him with “incitement to provoke social chaos.” Amid international pressure, the government released Mech Dara several weeks later.
- In April police arrested prominent student leader Koet Saray, who had spoken out in defense of villagers in a land dispute with authorities; he was convicted on incitement and other charges and sentenced to four years in prison in November. In July, a Cambodian court gave a group of environmental activists from the group Mother Nature long prison terms for insulting the king and plotting to overthrow the government.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 0 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 0 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 0 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 0 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 0 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 1 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 1 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 0 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 1 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 1 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 3 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 1 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 0 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 1 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 1 / 4 |