Freedom in the World 2025 - Australia

Free
95
/ 100
Political Rights 39 / 40
Civil Liberties 56 / 60
Last Year's Score & Status
95 / 100 Free
A country or territory’s Freedom in the World status depends on its aggregate Political Rights score, on a scale of 0–40, and its aggregate Civil Liberties score, on a scale of 0–60. See the methodology.
 
 

Overview

Australia has a strong record of advancing and protecting political rights and civil liberties. Challenges to these freedoms include the threat of foreign political influence, harsh policies toward asylum seekers, de facto discrimination against LGBT+ people, legal constraints on the press, and ongoing difficulties in ensuring the equal rights of First Nations Australians.

Key Developments in 2024

  • The social media company Meta announced in March that it would not renew agreements it reached under a 2021 law to pay Australian news outlets for the use of their content on its platforms; the firm’s Facebook platform subsequently shut down its “news” tab for Australian users. The move raised concerns about the finances of Australian media, and several news organizations carried out staff cuts later in the year. Separately, in November Parliament enacted a law that would bar children under age 16 from using social media. The law, which was not expected to be enforced before late 2025, prompted warnings that age-verification tools could undermine the privacy and security of all users, and that exclusion from social media could increase the isolation of some young people.
  • Sam Mostyn, a businesswoman and gender equality advocate, was appointed in April to serve as governor-general—the monarch’s representative as head of state—and took office in July.
  • In August, Parliament enacted legislation that enabled Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Labor Party government to place the construction wing of one of Australia’s largest unions, the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU), into administration based on allegations—untested in court—that it had links to organized crime. The government-appointed administrators, who were installed later that month, were empowered to fire union employees and expel members, alter the CFMEU’s internal rules, and disqualify union officers for up to five years. The takeover prompted street protests in major cities in September, and it came as the union movement sought to reverse a long-term decline in membership; while only 13.1 percent of Australian workers were union members as of August, down from about 40 percent in 1992, this represented an increase from 12.5 percent in 2022.
  • In October, a new Administrative Review Tribunal officially replaced the older Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), which reviewed the merits of administrative decisions by government agencies but had drawn accusations that it was stacked with appointees linked to the right-leaning opposition Liberal Party and National Party. The government sought to address concerns about politicization of the new tribunal by introducing measures to ensure a transparent, merit-based appointment process.
  • The government continued to introduce new immigration laws to bolster its powers following a 2023 court decision that banned the indefinite detention of asylum seekers and recognized refugees. In late November, Parliament enacted three laws that restricted immigration detainees’ access to mobile phones, set criminal penalties for failed asylum seekers and others who refuse to cooperate with their own deportations, and facilitated deportations to third countries.
  • Parliament adopted a number of laws during the year that were aimed at improving conditions for workers in the country. A measure that came into force in August granted eligible employees a right to refuse to monitor or respond to work-related communications outside their working hours, with disputes over the “reasonableness” of the refusal to be resolved by the Fair Work Commission. Legislation that took effect in October stipulated that employees who initiate legal claims against their employers for discrimination or harassment would not be required to pay their employer’s legal costs, even if they are unsuccessful in court.

This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.

For additional background information, see last year’s full report.

Political Rights

A Electoral Process

A1 0-4 pts
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4
A2 0-4 pts
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4
A3 0-4 pts
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 4 / 4

B Political Pluralism and Participation

B1 0-4 pts
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 4 / 4
B2 0-4 pts
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 4 / 4
B3 0-4 pts
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? 4 / 4
B4 0-4 pts
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? 3 / 4

C Functioning of Government

C1 0-4 pts
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 4 / 4
C2 0-4 pts
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 4 / 4
C3 0-4 pts
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? 4 / 4

Score Change: The score improved from 3 to 4 because legislation that increased transparency surrounding ministerial appointments, including by mandating that such appointments be made public, took effect in late 2023.

Civil Liberties

D Freedom of Expression and Belief

D1 0-4 pts
Are there free and independent media? 3 / 4
D2 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? 4 / 4
D3 0-4 pts
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? 4 / 4
D4 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? 4 / 4

E Associational and Organizational Rights

E1 0-4 pts
Is there freedom of assembly? 4 / 4
E2 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? 4 / 4
E3 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? 3 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because the government used new legislation to force a major trade union into administration based on unproven allegations of misconduct and corruption, empowering government-appointed administrators to remove union officers and bar them from engaging in union activities.

F Rule of Law

F1 0-4 pts
Is there an independent judiciary? 4 / 4
F2 0-4 pts
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? 4 / 4
F3 0-4 pts
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? 4 / 4
F4 0-4 pts
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? 3 / 4

G Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights

G1 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? 4 / 4
G2 0-4 pts
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? 4 / 4
G3 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? 4 / 4
G4 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? 3 / 4
 

Wir führen eine Nutzer·innenbefragung durch und währen dankbar, wenn Sie sich die Zeit nehmen könnten, uns zu helfen ecoi.net zu verbessern.

Die Umfrage dauert ca. 7-15 Minuten.

Klicken Sie hier: zur Umfrage... Danke!

ecoi.net-Umfrage 2025