Dokument #1229492
IRB – Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (Autor)
The response to an information request
received in February 1989 on "Penalties against refusal to report
for recall to military service in Iraq" is attached. In addition, a
more recent response regarding 1) the penalty for deserting the
army and, 2) information on the consequences of return for Iraqis
is appended for your files:
1)
A 1985 United Nations report on
conscientious objectors to military service states that
"imprisonment or extended service requirements may arise from
failure to comply." [ A. Eide and C. Mubanga-Chipoya, United
Nations, Conscientious Objection to Military Service,
Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of
Minorities, (New York: United Nations Publications, 1985) p. 28.]
The Penal Code of the Popular Army, promulgated in March 1984,
provides for the death penalty for 11 capital offenses committed by
members of the army, [ Amnesty International, When the State
Kills... The Death Penalty: a Human Rights Issue, (New York:
Amnesty International, USA, 1989), pp. 151-153, attached. ]
however, the IRBDC does not have information as to whether
desertion is among these offenses. In February 1985, the government
of Iraq acknowledged the execution of some army deserters stating:
"desertion from military service during wartime is a crime
dangerous to the security and well-being of a country and is
punishable by death..." [ Amnesty International, Annual Report
1986, (London: Amnesty International Publications), p. 330.] In
September 1987, a Western diplomat commented on the execution of
deserters, stating that although "desertion was once punishable by
instant execution... [it now] draws a death sentence only [after] a
second offence because of the need to conserve manpower to fight
the Iranians." [ Alan Cowell, "Iraqi Leader Keeps Tight Grip on
Nation", The Ottawa Citizen, 29 September 1987.] The
diplomat further observed that public executions are used to
discourage others from desertion. Corroboration of "second-offence"
executions is not currently available to the IRBDC. On the other
hand, Amnesty International reported the execution of army
deserters during 1987, although the organization could not
ascertain the exact number of deaths, nor did it mention if these
were for first offence desertions. [Amnesty International,
Report 1988, (London: Amnesty International Publications,
1988), p. 237.]
Amnesties for Iraqi exiles have been
announced by the Iraqi leadership over the past couple of years.
The first, on 2 December 1987, was an amnesty granted to all Iraqis
living abroad who were convicted or suspected of criminal offenses,
including those sentenced to death. [ Keesing's Record of World
Events, Volume XXXIV, p. 35862.] However, in a November 1988
proclamation of amnesty for political offenders, President Saddam
Hussein did not appear to offer specific guarantees to amnesty
seekers, stating: "I cannot say that we respect human rights as we
wish to in Iraq because there are some authorities who need to
change their way of thinking to reflect the post-war situation." [
Alan George, "Saddam rules, OK", The Middle East, March
1989, p. 20.] At the time of writing its Report 1988,
Amnesty International was unaware of any persons who had taken
advantage of the amnesty. [ Report 1988, p. 236.] In a March
1989 document, Amnesty International notes that "Army deserters had
not benefited from several amnesties announced by the Iraqi
Government in the latter half of 1988 following the announcement of
a ceasefire in the Iran-Iraq conflict in July 1988." [Amnesty
International, "Iraq: Arrest and execution of army deserters,
military personnel and Ba'ath Party Officials", AI Index: MDE
14/05/89, 6 March 1989.] This report mentions the execution of 83
people in mid-December, many of whom were army deserters, and the
execution of an additional 14 persons in January 1989, who were
arrested on suspicion of plotting a coup. The Amnesty International
Report 1989 also mentions a January 1988 amnesty extended to
army deserters and to those who failed to report for military
service, but later reports the alleged execution of the deserters
in December 1988. [ Amnesty International, Report 1989,
(London: Amnesty International Publications, 1989), pp.
258-259.]
2)
Regarding the consequences of return,
several opposition political parties are prohibited in Iraq,
including the al-Da'wa al-Islamiyya, the Iraq Communist Party
(ICP), the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), the Patriotic Union of
Kurdistan (PUK), the Kurdistan Socialist Party - Iraq (KSP-I), and
the Kurdistan Popular Democratic Party (KPDP). [ Amnesty
International, Report 1988, (London: Amnesty International
Publications, 1988), p. 236.] Members of these parties have been
imprisoned or executed, and the authorities have sometimes
imprisoned relatives when suspects have not been found. [Ibid.] An
Amnesty International document "Iraq: The Death Penalty" (AI Index:
MDE 14/01/89) describes some of the capital offenses in Iraq (for
example, membership or affiliation to al-Da'wa al-Islamiyya is
punishable by death).
According to David Korn, author of a Middle
East Watch publication, to be released in December, some of those
potentially at risk in Iraq include:
1) anyone with a family relation in jail (for example, the Amnesty International Canadian Bulletin article, "29 Executed Say Reports" discusses the detention of 90 members of the Hakim family). One Amnesty International report entitled, "Iraq: Children: Innocent Victims of Political Repression" (AI Index: MDE 14/04/89, February 1989) lists the names of 315 "disappeared" children of the Barzani clan, and provides information on the arbitrary arrests, detention and torture of children who are relatives of people sought by the authorities.
2) anyone associated with one of the
aforementioned political groups (PUK, KDP, al-Da'wa al-Islamiyya,
etc.);
3) anyone who has criticized the Iraqi
government, at home or abroad. [ 18 October 1989. David Korn,
author of a Middle East Watch document, to be released in December,
which details the human rights situation in the State of Iraq.]
David Korn also mentioned an incident
involving the forcible return (by the Iraqi Embassy) of some Iraqi
students studying in Egypt. He observed that, according to his
sources, the students disappeared subsequent to their return to
Iraq.
In its Country Reports for 1988, the
U.S. Department of State contends that some Iraqis, particularly
Assyrian Christians accepted as refugees abroad, have returned to
Iraq on temporary visits and have been free to enter and exit the
country repeatedly. [ U.S. Department of State, Country Reports
on Human Rights Practices for 1988, (Washington: U.S.
Government Printing Office, February 1989), pp. 1360-1361.] It
adds, however, that those who departed after the Iran-Iraq war
began are unable to leave Iraq once they return. Another source,
Documentation Refugiés, indicates that the government
requires, as a condition of return, that potential repatriates
cease all their political activities and abandon their claims (like
the Kurds) for autonomy. ["Les Refugiés Irakiens Dans le
Monde", Documentation Refugiés, supplement au No. 55,
6/15 Novembre 1988, p. 6.] A report carried in the Toronto
Star on 26 March 1989 quotes British human rights workers as
charging that the Iraqi regime continues to torture, summarily
execute, and unlawfully detain perceived opponents. [ Harvey
Morris, "Iraq regime still tortures opponents, experts say",
Toronto Star, 26 March 1989.]