a-6200-3 (ACC-KOS-6202)

Nach einer Recherche in unserer Länderdokumentation und im Internet können wir Ihnen zu oben genannter Fragestellung Materialien zur Verfügung stellen, die unter anderem folgende Informationen enthalten:
“CEKU URGES ALBANIANS NOT TO SELL PROPERTY IN NORTHERN KOSOVO
PRISTINA, Aug. 01 (Beta) - Kosovo Premier Agim Ceku has urged Albanians living in the majority Serb part of the divided town of Kosovska Mitrovica and northern Kosovo not to sell their real estate until the resolution of Kosovo's status, claiming the property is being bought by the Serbian government, Pristina broadcasters reported on Aug. 1.
Ceku told the Albanians living in the northern part of Kosovska Mitrovica to be patient and "more nationally aware" until the status issue was resolved. He pointed out that the Kosovo government could not prevent such transactions or influence the sale deals.
The Kosovo Assembly on July 31 debated the sale of Albanian real estate, with claims that the Belgrade authorities are buying Albanians' property in northern Kosovska Mitrovica at high prices.” (MFA Republic of Serbia, 2. August 2007)
“Property Restitution
The Kosovo Property Agency (KPA) was created in March 2006 under the PISG as the successor to the UNMIK Housing and Property Directorate. While the directorate handled only claims to residential properties, the new agency is responsible for the resolution of residential, commercial, and agricultural property claims from the Kosovo conflict. By September the agency had received 27,064 claims: 24,064 for agricultural property, 844 for commercial property, and 1,808 for residential property. Kosovo Serbs in the northern part of Mitrovica continued to occupy Kosovo Albanian properties, while Kosovo Albanians in the southern part occupied and denied Kosovo Serbs access to their property.
The Housing and Property Claims Commission held its final session in June, where it considered 53 requests pending for reconsideration. Some 98.8 percent of all commission decisions had been implemented, leaving some 354 cases remaining. In early August UNMIK principal deputy SRSG temporarily suspended enforcement of KPA decisions due to the refusal of local authorities in the municipality of Klina to enforce them. This action prompted greater cooperation from municipal authorities, and UNMIK lifted the suspension on August 8; the validity of property agency's decisions was unaffected.
At year's end the property agency had 4,665 properties under administration; 3,350 upon the request of a successful claimant, and 1,315 based on ex officio intervention by the Housing and Property Claims Commission (the predecessor agency to the KPA). Of these cases, 167 were subjects of repossession requests.
The KPA's mandate includes supervising the rental of certain abandoned property in Kosovo. To this end, the agency managed a rental scheme for properties under its administration, enabling property holders to receive rental income from the property by authorizing the agency to rent it until the owner decides to utilize the property in another way. A total of 813 properties were being rented at year's end, of which 113 were rented ex officio. The KPA collected approximately $618,330 (423,514 euros) in rent through this program.
The backlog of property-related claims in municipal courts remained high, with some 21,000 at year's end, representing almost exclusively monetary claims by Kosovo Serbs for war-related damage.” (USDOS, 11. März 2008, Sek. 1e)
“Serbs and other minorities face harassment and physical violence for being who they are, for living in their own homes if they belong to the ‘wrong’ community, and for speaking their own language. Kosovo government authorities, UN administrators and police, and NATO peacekeepers have been unwilling or unable to bring to justice many perpetrators of crimes directed at minorities.” (MRGI, 11. März 2008, S. 144)
Diese Informationen beruhen auf einer zeitlich begrenzten Recherche in öffentlich zugänglichen Dokumenten, die ACCORD derzeit zur Verfügung stehen. Diese Antwort stellt keine Meinung zum Inhalt eines bestimmten Ansuchens um Asyl oder anderen internationalen Schutz dar. Wir empfehlen, die verwendeten Materialien zur Gänze durchzusehen.