Investment Climate Statements for 2016 - Nepal

Executive Summary

With an annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of about USD 21 billion, and total trade of USD 8.6 billion, Nepal is a small contributor to the global economy. However, its location between India and China – two of the world’s fastest growing economies – may make Nepal attractive to some foreign investors. Nepal’s natural resources have significant commercial potential.

  • Hydroelectric power – of which Nepal has an estimated 40,000 MW of commercially viable potential – could be a major source of income and help meet South Asia’s growing energy needs.
  • Other sectors offering potential investment opportunities include agriculture, tourism, and infrastructure.

Nepal offers opportunities for investors willing to accept inherent risks and the unpredictability of doing business in the country. While Nepal has established some investment-friendly laws and regulations, significant investment barriers remain.

  • Corruption, laws limiting the operation of foreign banks, limitations on the repatriation of profits, limited currency exchange facilities, and the government’s monopoly over certain sectors of the economy, such as electricity transmission and petroleum distribution, undermine foreign investment in Nepal.
  • Millions of Nepalis look for employment overseas, creating a drain on an already poorly trained workforce.
  • The proliferation of politicized trade unions, typically affiliated with one or more political parties, and unpredictable general strikes also limit investment.
  • Immigration laws and visa policies for foreign investors can be cumbersome and obstructive, which are exacerbated by an inefficient government bureaucracy and a relatively high turnover rate of officials.
  • Political uncertainty is another challenge for foreign investors in Nepal. The country has made considerable strides since the end of a ten-year Maoist insurgency in 2006. Nepal has held free and fair Constituent Assembly elections in 2008 and 2013, completed the integration of former combatants into the Nepalese Army, and promulgated a constitution in 2015. However, widespread dissatisfaction with some constitutional provisions led to prolonged protests across much of Nepal’s southern Terai belt, as well as a prolonged blockage of Nepal’s border with India.
  • Nepal’s geography also presents challenges. The country’s mountainous terrain and poor infrastructure increase the cost of transportation of raw materials as well as finished goods. The nearest seaport is in Kolkata, India, about 900 kilometers from Kathmandu.

Table 1

Measure

Year

Index or Rank

Website Address

TI Corruption Perceptions index

2015

130 of 167

transparency.org/cpi2015/results

World Bank’s Doing Business Report “Ease of Doing Business”

2015

99 of 189

doingbusiness.org/rankings

Global Innovation Index

2015

135 of 141

globalinnovationindex.org/content/page/data-analysis

U.S. FDI in partner country ($M USD, stock positions)

2013-14

$5.36

Host Government/DOI

World Bank GNI per capita

2014

$730

data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.CD

Millennium Challenge Corporation Country Scorecard

The Millennium Challenge Corporation, a U.S. Government entity charged with delivering development grants to countries that have demonstrated a commitment to reform, produced “scorecards” for countries with a per capita gross national income (GNI) of USD 4,125 or less. A list of countries/economies with MCC scorecards and links to those scorecards is available here: http://www.mcc.gov/pages/selection/scorecards. Details on each of the MCC’s indicators and a guide to reading the scorecards are available here: www.mcc.gov/pages/docs/doc/report-guide-to-the-indicators-and-the-selection-process-fy-2015

1. Openness To, and Restrictions Upon, Foreign Investment

Attitude toward Foreign Direct Investment

The Government of Nepal (GON) officially welcomes foreign direct investment (FDI). In practice, however, American and other foreign companies say that corruption, bureaucracy, and a weak regulatory environment make investing in Nepal very difficult. While official laws are generally welcoming to foreign investors, the investment climate remains challenging. As an example, in January 2016, the Norwegian company Statkraft notified the Investment Board of Nepal (IBN) that it was discontinuing work on the 650 MW Tamakoshi hydropower project and withdrawing from discussions on a Project Development Agreement. The company cited the “absence of necessary policies and regulatory framework,” and “increased bureaucratic hurdles for foreign investments” as reasons for its withdrawal.

Other Investment Policy Reviews

In 2012, the World Trade Organization (WTO) conducted a trade policy review, available online at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp357_e.htm

Laws/Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment

The most significant foreign investment laws are the Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act of 1992 (since amended), the Foreign Investment and One Window Policy of 2015, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1962, the Immigration Rules of 1994, the Customs Act of 1997, the Industrial Enterprise Act of 1992, the Electricity Act of 1992, the Privatization Act of 1994, and the annual budget, which outlines customs, duties, export service charges, sales, airfreight and income taxes, and other excise taxes that affect foreign investment.

In February 2015, the GON issued the new Foreign Investment and One-Window Policy 2015, which replaced the Foreign Investment Policy of 1992. The new policy defines priority sectors for foreign investment, including hydropower, transportation infrastructure, agro-based and herbal processing industries, tourism, and mines and manufacturing industries. The Foreign Investment and One Window Policy also establishes currency repatriation guidelines, outlines visa regulations and arbitration guidelines, permits full foreign ownership in most sectors, and creates a “one window committee” for foreign investors.

The Foreign Investment and One Window Policy opened the retail sector to foreign investment for the first time, but with some conditions. Foreign multi-brand retail stores (i.e., Wal-Mart or Tesco) are now permitted, provided the investor has operations in more than two countries and invests more than USD 5 million in fixed capital. The policy also states that foreign investors will be treated the same as domestic investors, and industries run by foreign investors cannot be nationalized. The new policy also aimed at easing visa policies for investors, family members, and assisting foreign investors with land acquisition, industrial security, and repatriation of investment and profits.

The Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act (FITTA) of 1992, as amended, eliminated the minimum investment requirement and opened legal, management consulting, accounting, and engineering services to foreign investment with a 51-percent ownership limit. It also clarified rules relating to business and resident visas. In general, under the FITTA, all agreements related to foreign investment are governed by Nepali law and subject to arbitration in Kathmandu under the United Nations Commission for International Trade Law rules. However, foreign law can be applicable in cases where the foreign investment exceeds approximately USD 6 million and where the parties make this choice clear in their agreement. The GON is revising the FITTA, although it is unclear when the legislation will be approved by Parliament.

The Customs Act and the Industrial Enterprises Act, revised in 1997, established invoice-based customs valuations and eliminated many investment tax incentives, replacing them with a lower, uniform rate. The Electricity Act defines special terms and conditions for investment in hydropower development. The Privatization Act of 1994 authorizes and defines the procedures for privatization of state-owned enterprises to broaden participation of the private sector in the operation of such enterprises.

The Nepal Stock Exchange does not allow foreign investors to own or trade any publicly traded companies on the exchange. Stock trading is available only for citizens of Nepal.

The terms and conditions of intellectual property protection are defined by the 1965 Patent, Design, and Trademark Act and the 2002 Copyright Act. The latter covers electronic audio and visual materials and subjects violators to fines and imprisonment, as well as the confiscation of unauthorized materials. Violators must also pay compensation claimed by the copyright holder. However, the law does not meet the standards for trade-related intellectual property rights required by the World Trade Organization. The Competition Promotion and Market Protection Act (2007) controls anti-competitive practices, protects against monopolies, promotes fair competition, and regulates mergers and acquisitions. The Competition Promotion and Market Protection Act, also contains special provisions for controlling black markets and misleading advertisements.

There is no public evidence of direct executive interference in the court system that could affect foreign investors. However, in recent years there has been public and media criticism of the politicization of the judiciary, including appointments of judges to Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court allegedly based on political affiliation.

Business Registration

The Department of Industry (DOI) provides registration for both domestic and foreign businesses (www.doind.gov.np/en/). The DOI is also the regulator of industrial properties like patent, design, and trademarks. The DOI’s Industrial Promotion Board is responsible for approving small and medium-tier investments, while large-scale investments (more than USD 100 million) are approved by the Investment Board of Nepal (IBN). The DOI does not provide online registration. Applicants need to submit applications in writing and furnish hard copies of relevant documents for registration.

The IBN manages public-private partnerships (PPPs), cooperatives, and domestic and foreign private investment in the infrastructure sectors (www.ibn.gov.np). The IBN is mandated to grant approval for projects over NPR 10 billion (approximately USD 95 million). IBN does not provide an online registration facility. Applicants are required to submit applications in writing and furnish hard copies of relevant documents for approval.

All domestic and foreign companies are required to incorporate their business with the Ministry of Industry’s Office of Company Registrar (OCR). The OCR provides online registration facility (www.ocr.gov.np/index.php/en/).

The Inland Revenue Department (IRD) provides registration for all domestic and foreign businesses (www.ird.gov.np). Investors can register online for permanent account numbers and tax documents.

The Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) – the central bank of Nepal – provides approval and registration for banks and financial institutions (www.nrb.org.np). NRB does not provide online registration. Applicants need to submit applications in writing and furnish hard copies of relevant documents for registration.

The Nepal Telecommunications Authority (NTA) is the telecommunications regulatory body of Nepal, which provides prior approval and registration for all telecommunication services (www.nta.gov.np/en). NTA does not provide online registration. Applicants need to submit applications in writing and furnish hard copies of relevant documents for registration.

The Insurance Board regulates the insurance business of Nepal. The Insurance Board does not provide online registration. Applicants need to submit applications in writing and furnish hard copies of relevant documents for registration.

Additional References

Industrial Promotion

The industrial sector accounts for about 15 percent of the country’s GDP. The economy remains dependent upon subsistence agriculture (34 percent of GDP) and remittances (equivalent to about 30 percent of GDP). A lack of industrial growth has contributed to underemployment and unemployment, which in turn has contributed to an outward migration of youth seeking employment outside of Nepal.

The GON aims to attract FDI primarily in the infrastructure sector, especially roads and hydropower projects. Nepal’s 2011 Industrial Policy, now under review, identifies strategies for promoting FDI. It calls for a greater focus on economic diplomacy from Nepali diplomatic missions abroad and seeks to leverage non-resident Nepalis as a source of FDI. It also aims to increase new product development in Nepal by giving customs breaks to investors who need to import raw materials or foreign-made goods.

Limits on Foreign Control and Right to Private Ownership and Establishment

Foreign and domestic private entities have the right to establish and own business enterprises and engage in various forms of remunerative activity. However, certain sectors are not open to foreign investment, including small-scale and “traditional” industries (such as handicrafts, wood carvings, and artwork), real estate, some types of primary agriculture and agribusiness, and weapons production. Depending upon the sectors foreign entities intend to operate in, approval and registration requirements may vary.

Other than the restricted sectors mentioned above, 100 percent foreign investment is permitted in most sectors. Some limits on foreign ownership are imposed for certain services sectors, such as banking and financial institutions where foreign investment is only permitted as a joint venture with a minimum of 20 percent to a maximum of 85 percent foreign ownership. Such joint ventures must be incorporated in Nepal in accordance with relevant Nepali laws. Branch operations of a foreign bank are only allowed in the wholesale banking sector, not in the retail banking sector. To operate a branch office of a foreign bank in Nepal, the minimum capital requirement is USD 20 million, and an additional USD 5 million is required for each new branch office. Restrictions on branch operations of foreign banks in the retail banking sector and requirements for mandatory domestic joint venture partner(s) have discouraged many international banks from entering Nepal’s banking sector.

Privatization Program

Economic reforms, deregulation, privatization of businesses and industries under government control, and liberalized policies toward FDI were initiated in the early 1990s. Sectors such as telecommunications, civil aviation, coal imports, print and electronic media, insurance, and hydropower generation were opened for private investment, both domestic and foreign.

The first privatization of a state-owned corporation was conducted in October 1992 through a cabinet decision (executive order). The Privatization Act was passed fourteen months later in January 1994. A total of 23 state-owned corporations have been privatized, liquidated, or dissolved. The process, however, has been static since 2003. While foreign companies can participate in the privatization of state-owned enterprises, the government has not restarted privatization efforts. As of 2016, Nepal has 37 state-owned enterprises.

Screening of FDI

There are two government entities responsible for foreign investment. The first is the Industrial Promotion Board (IPB), chaired by the Minister of Industry, which is charged with coordinating economic policies, establishing guidelines for investment, approving foreign investment proposals, and determining applicable investment incentives.

The second entity is the Investment Board of Nepal (IBN), which was created to serve as a “one window” facility for domestic and foreign investors pursuing projects worth more than USD 100 million, or large scale projects in priority sectors such as civil aviation, tourism, and hydropower. The Board, chaired by the Prime Minister, has the authority to formulate investment policies, prioritize and approve projects, facilitate the signing of agreements among different ministries, provide financial and nonfinancial facilities, procure land, monitor project progress, order government agencies to issue necessary project approvals, and bypass existing regulations in the name of investment promotion.

The IBN has focused on hydropower development, and it is responsible for projects larger than 500 MW. In 2014, the IBN signed power-development agreements with Indian investors for two 900 MW developments, the Upper Tamakoshi and Arun III projects. Negotiations are ongoing with Indian and Chinese investors on other large hydropower projects. In January 2016, Norwegian company Statkraft notified the IBN that it was discontinuing work on the 650 MW Tamakoshi hydropower project and withdrawing from discussions on a Project Development Agreement, citing the “absence of necessary policies and regulatory framework,” and “increased bureaucratic hurdles for foreign investments” as reasons for the company’s withdrawal.

Prior to the establishment of the Investment Board, the Department of Industry, under the Ministry of Industry, was designated as the “one window servicing agency” for all FDI. The Department of Industry still registers and classifies foreign investments and manages the income tax and duty drawbacks granted to some foreign investments. The Department of Industry remains the focal point for foreign investments of less than USD 100 million or investments outside of the priority sectors.

Under current administrative procedures, foreign investors are required to obtain licenses for manufacturing or service sector investments. Investments below USD 20 million are referred to the Department of Industry for action and are typically approved at the departmental level without the involvement of the IPB. For investments over USD 20 million, as many as six ministries review the business proposal prior to consideration by the IPB.

The Department of Electricity Development, under the Ministry of Energy, is responsible for licensing all investments in hydropower projects. However, decisions on project proposals that involve foreign investment are made by the Ministry of Energy itself. The Nepal Rastra Bank, the country’s central bank, is responsible for issuing licenses to operate commercial banks and financial institutions. The Insurance Board is responsible for issuing licenses to operate insurance companies. The Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal is responsible for granting operating licenses to domestic and foreign airline operators, and the Nepal Telecommunications Authority is responsible for issuing licenses for operating any type of telecommunications and information technology services.

Licensing of new investments is often time-consuming and requires legal counsel and patience. The IPB, for example, is mandated by law to make a licensing decision within 30 days of submission of an application, but this deadline is routinely missed.

Competition Promotion and Market Protection

The Competition Promotion and Market Protection Act (2007) controls anti-competitive practices, protects consumers against monopolies, promotes fair competition for the growth of trade and commerce, and includes provisions for the control of mergers and acquisitions that would create potential monopolies. The Competition Promotion and Market Protection Act also contains special provisions for controlling black markets and misleading advertisements.

The Competition Promotion and Market Protection Board, established as part of the act, is chaired by the Secretary of the Ministry of Commerce. The Board is mandated to take measures to enhance fair market competition by encouraging competition and preventing monopolies. The Board is comprised of members from the Ministry of Law and Justice, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Commerce, two private sector representatives, four consumer rights representatives, and the Director General of the Department of Commerce. The act also calls for the designation of a government official to serve as the market protection officer at the district level to investigate cases relating to violations of the Competition Promotion and Market Protection Act.

The new Constitution of Nepal (2015), under article 51 “Policies of the State,” notes the need to protect the interest of consumers by maintaining fairness in trade, making the national economy competitive, ending practices such as black marketing and monopolies, and promoting competition in all business activity. The Black Marketing and Certain other Social Offenses and Punishment Act (1975) prohibits business practices such as black marketing, profiteering, hoarding and creation of artificial scarcity, fraudulent sale, and the adulteration and sale of drugs.

The Industrial Enterprises Act, 1992 (currently being revised) gives guidelines for economic policies to make the industrial sector competitive. The Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act (1992) states that industrialization of the country requires foreign investment and technology transfer to make the economy viable, dynamic, and competitive by mobilizing limited capital and other resources. The Consumer Protection Act (1997) protects the rights of the consumer and restricts unfair trade practices. Provisions in the Financial Administration Regulation (1999) prohibit unfair and anti-competitive practices in procurement of goods and services for the government.

Enforcement of such laws is irregular, which can create space for corrupt practices. Government procurements are often marred with charges of corruption and lack of transparency in the selection process. The constitutionally-mandated anti-corruption body, the Commission for Investigation Abuse of Authority (CIAA), monitors, enforces and prosecutes actions or decision by any government agency that violate or intend to violate laws (or constitute a misuse of power) that can be considered corrupt practice under the laws of Nepal. Private entities or individuals found engaging in such corrupt practices can be prosecuted by the CIAA.

2. Conversion and Transfer Policies

Foreign Exchange

The Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act of 1992 states that foreign investors can repatriate all profits and dividends, all money raised through the sale of shares, all payments of principal and interest on any foreign loans, and any amounts invested in transferring foreign technology. Foreign nationals working in local industries are also allowed to repatriate 75 percent of their income. Repatriation facilities (such as opening bank accounts or obtaining permission for remittance of foreign exchange) are available based on the recommendation of the Department of Industry, which normally provides approval of the original investment.

Despite these official policies, repatriation is difficult and not guaranteed. The relevant GON department and the NRB, which regulates foreign exchange, must approve the repatriation of funds. In most cases, approval must also be obtained from the Department of Industry. In the case of telecommunications, the Nepal Telecommunications Authority must approve the repatriation. In joint venture cases, the NRB and the Ministry of Finance must grant approval.

Several foreign companies have reported that the Government of Nepal insists on signing contracts using Nepal rupees (NPR) and not major world currencies, such as the U.S. dollar. Nepal’s currency has been pegged to the Indian rupee (INR) since 1993 at a rate of 1.6 NPR to 1 INR. In recent years, the dollar has strengthened significantly against the NPR.

Remittance Policies

Foreign investors must apply to the NRB to repatriate funds from the sale of shares. For repatriation of funds connected with dividends, principal and interest on foreign loans, technology transfer fees, or expatriate salaries, the foreign investor applies first to the Department of Industry and then to the NRB. At the first stage of obtaining remittance approval, foreign investors must submit remittance requests to a commercial bank. However, final remittance approval is granted by the NRB foreign exchange department, a process that is often opaque and time-consuming.

After administrative approvals, a lengthy clearance process in the banking system also slows the transfer of foreign exchange. The experience of U.S. and other foreign investors indicates serious discrepancies between the government’s stated policy of repatriation and its implementation.

In general, Nepalis are not permitted to invest outside of Nepal. Exceptions, however, can be granted on a case-by-case basis, and policing of the prohibition is weak.

The Financial Action Task Force (www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2015/vol2/index.htm) lists Nepal as a country that is “monitored.”

3. Expropriation and Compensation

The Industrial Enterprise Act of 1992 states that “no industry shall be nationalized.” To date, there have been no cases of nationalization in Nepal, nor are there any official policies that suggest expropriation should be a concern for prospective investors. However, companies can be sealed or confiscated if they do not pay taxes in accordance with Nepali law, and bank accounts can be frozen if there are suspicions of money laundering or other financial crimes. There have been no government actions or shifts in government policy that indicate possible expropriations in the foreseeable future.

4. Dispute Settlement

Legal System, Specialized Courts, Judicial Independence, Judgments of Foreign Courts

Nepal’s court system is based on Common Law and does not have a commercial code. Contract law is codified. A commercial court exists at the appellate level.

In disputes involving a foreign investor, the concerned parties are encouraged to settle through mediation in the presence of the Department of Industry. If the dispute cannot be resolved, cases may be settled either in a Nepali court or in another legal jurisdiction, depending on the amount of the initial investment and the procedures specified in the contract. Commercial disputes under the jurisdiction of Nepali courts and laws typically drag on for years.

Liquidation is covered by both the Company Act and the Insolvency Act of 2006. If a company is solvent, its liquidation is covered by the Company Act. If the company is insolvent and unable to pay liabilities, or liabilities are more than assets, then its liquidation is covered by the Insolvency Act. Under the Company Act, the claimant priorities are 1) government revenue; 2) creditors; and 3) shareholders. Under the Insolvency Act, the government is equal to all other unsecured creditors. Monetary judgments are made in local currency.

Nepal is a signatory to and adheres to the New York Convention of 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, and it has updated its legislation on dispute settlement to bring its laws into line with the requirements of that convention. The Arbitration Act of 1999 allows the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and limits the conditions under which those awards can be challenged.

Bankruptcy

There is no specific act in Nepal that exclusively covers bankruptcy. The 2006 Insolvency Act provides for insolvency proceedings in Nepal and specifies the conditions under which such proceedings can occur. Additionally, the General Code of 1963 covers bankruptcy-related issues. Creditors, shareholders, or debenture holders can initiate insolvency proceedings against a company by filing a petition at the court.

Investment Disputes

Disputes are not frequently reported. We are aware of two cases in the last ten years in which a U.S. investor claimed that the GON did not honor portions of contracts.

All real property transactions must be registered, and property holdings cannot be transferred without following established procedures. Even so, property disputes account for half of the current backlog in Nepal’s overburdened court system, and cases can take years to settle. Moreover, laws and regulations regarding property registration, ownership, and transfer are unclear, and interpretation can vary from case to case.

International Arbitration

In cases where contracts provide for the settlement of disputes through arbitration, disputes will be settled according to the procedures described in the contract. If no procedures are specified, the dispute will be settled according to the Arbitration Act of 1999.

In the event of a dispute with a foreign investor, the concerned parties are encouraged to settle it through mediation in the presence of the Department of Industry. If the dispute cannot be settled, cases involving investments of less than USD 5 million are referred to arbitration in Nepal in accordance with the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission for International Trade Law. For investments that exceed this amount, the GON will permit stipulation of legal jurisdiction other than Nepal in shareholder agreements and contracts.

ICSID Convention and New York Convention

Nepal is a signatory to and adheres to the New York Convention of 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, and it has updated its legislation on dispute settlement to bring its laws into line with the requirements of that convention. The Arbitration Act of 1999 allows the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and limits the conditions under which those awards can be challenged.

Duration of Dispute Resolution – Local Courts

Under insolvency proceedings, except when otherwise provided for in the agreement, the arbitrator is required to pronounce the decision within 120 days from the date of submission of documents. If the issue requiring arbitration is found to be inextricably linked with another issue on which the arbitrator cannot pronounce a decision, the concerned party may file a complaint to the court within 35 days from the date of notice from the arbitrator. Despite these regulations, commercial disputes under the jurisdiction of the Nepali courts and laws typically drag on for years.

5. Performance Requirements and Investment Incentives

WTO/TRIMS

Nepal became a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) on April 23, 2004. During its accession, Nepal made commitments on Trade Related Investment Measures (TRIMs), including for agriculture, goods, and services. The December 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration allowed least developed countries (LDCs) to maintain on a temporary basis (five years, renewable subject to review) measures that reduce their obligations under the TRIMs Agreement. The Ministerial Declaration allowed Nepal the flexibility to implement provisions such as local content requirement on foreign investment. However, Nepal’s investment regime is liberalized and there are no provisions for local content requirement (except for the retail banking sector). Under Nepal’s WTO accession commitments, Nepal was allowed to continue with local content requirements for foreign investment in the retail banking sector.

Investment Incentives

The Nepal Laws Revision Act of 2000 eliminated most tax incentives; however, exports are still favored, as is investment in certain “priority” industries, such as tourism, civil aviation, and hydropower. There is no discrimination against foreign investors with respect to export/import policies or non-tariff barriers. There is no local content or export performance requirement. There is no requirement that foreign investors’ share of foreign equity be reduced over time, or that technology be transferred. Foreign investment in cottage industries is not allowed.

The GON offers tax incentives to encourage industries to locate outside the Kathmandu Valley to reduce pollution and overpopulation in the Valley and to encourage development in poorer areas of Nepal.

Profits from exports are taxed at 20 percent. Customs, value added tax (VAT), and excise duties on raw materials used in the production of export items are supposed to be reimbursed within 60 days. In practice, however, these duty paybacks are often significantly delayed. Although income in certain priority industries, such as garments, carpets, and jewelry, used to be taxed at a concessional rate of ten percent, the Income Tax Act 2002 removed most of these concessions.

The Electricity Act of 1992 governs foreign investments in hydropower generation. The Act provides a flat one-percent customs rate on all imported construction materials, equipment, and spare parts, provided that such goods are not manufactured in Nepal.

Foreign investors are not required to disclose proprietary information to government agencies as part of the regulatory approval process. There are no restrictions on participation by foreign firms in government-sponsored research and development programs. However, depending on the nature of the job and expertise required, government agencies sometimes limit such participation to Nepali nationals.

In 2015 the GON issued the new Foreign Investment and One-Window Policy, which replaced the Foreign Investment Policy of 1992. The new policy defined priority sectors for foreign investment, including hydropower, transportation infrastructure, agro-based and herbal processing industries, tourism, and manufacturing industries. Foreign multi-brand retail chains are now permitted, provided the investor has operations in more than two countries and invests more than USD 5 million in fixed capital. The policy also states that foreign investors will be treated the same as domestic investors, and that nationalization of industries run by foreign investors is not allowed.

Research and Development

Nepal has limited funding and facilities for research and development. Most research-related activities are conducted by government agencies by in-house researchers and scientists. For example, the Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) conducts research on seed and plant varieties, and agencies under the Ministry of Science and Technology conduct research on climate change and other environment related areas. The Nepal Academy of Science and Technology, an institute mandated to develop Nepal’s national science and technology policy, conducts research in various fields, including the preservation of indigenous technologies. The Department of Food Technology and Quality Control under the Ministry of Agriculture Development primarily focuses on maintaining safety and quality of food and feed products in the country.

Performance Requirements

Nepali laws are either silent or unclear on performance requirements. There are no mandates for local employment. While the 2015 Foreign Investment Policy is supposed to ease the process of getting visas for foreigners, challenges remain, according to anecdotal reports. There are no government imposed conditions on permission to invest and the GON does not use “forced localization” policies.

Data Storage

Nepal has no laws relating to storage of data for law enforcement or privacy purposes.

6. Protection of Property Rights

Real Property

The Secured Transactions Act (2006) applies mortgage or lien in all transactions where the effect is to secure an obligation with collateral, including pledge, hypothecation and hire-purchase, sale of accounts and secured sales contracts, and lease of goods. The GON has established Secured Transactions Registration Office for registering notices as provided in this Act. Pursuant to this Act, the GON may also designate any office to perform the function of registering notices.

The government does not have special protections for traditional use rights for indigenous peoples. Most arable land has a title, although titles have sometimes been acquired in a fraudulent manner. There are no exclusive regulations for land lease or acquisition by foreign and/or non-resident investors. The Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act (1992), which governs foreign investment in general, and related laws governing foreign investment clearly state that investors can own any property, the title of which rests with the business/company, and not the owner.

Intellectual Property Rights

There is no exclusive act for the protection of intellectual property, and protections in general remain weak with little enforcement. Nepal signed the 1994 Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. However, patent registration under the Patent, Design, and Trademark Act does not provide automatic protection to foreign trademarks and designs. Similarly, Nepal does not automatically recognize patents awarded by other nations. Trademarks must be registered in Nepal to receive protection. Once registered, trademarks are protected for a period of seven years. The Copyright Act of 2002 covers most modern forms of authorship and provides adequate periods of protection. However, enforcement is weak. Nepal faces serious challenges in preventing the sale of counterfeit goods. The primary marketplaces in Nepal are flooded with counterfeit products, including electronic equipment, clothing, digital media, and pharmaceutical products.

Nepal became a member of World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) convention in1997, but has not yet signed the WIPO Copyright Treaty or the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. Nepal is not listed in the USTR’s Special 301 report nor is it listed in the notorious market report. The GON is drafting an IPR Policy and Industrial Enterprise Act..

For additional information about treaty obligations and points of contact at local IP offices, please see WIPO’s country profiles at: www.wipo.int/directory/en/.

Resources for Rights Holders

Kevin Price
Economic Officer
U.S. Embassy Kathmandu
+977-1-423-4142
PriceKC@state.gov
A list of lawyers is available at: http://nepal.usembassy.gov/service/emergency-services/legal-assistance.html

7. Transparency of the Regulatory System

Foreign investors in Nepal deal with a cumbersome legal system in which basic procedures are neither quick nor routine. Government bureaucracy, with frequent changes of personnel, can be reluctant to accept legal precedents, and businesses are often forced to re-litigate issues that had been previously settled. Limitations on foreign ownership in some sectors create additional hurdles and red tape for foreign investors. Proposed laws and regulations may not be made available in draft form for public comment.

Foreign investors complain about bureaucratic delays and lack of transparency in procuring investment licenses. Government procurement is another area cited for lack of regulation and transparency. The Financial Procedures Rules of 2007, which govern most of the government’s procurement, mandate government agencies to choose the lowest-cost bidder.

Labor, health, and safety laws are unevenly enforced. Many companies report that the process of terminating unsatisfactory employees is cumbersome, and that protective labor laws make it difficult to bring skilled foreign specialists, such as pilots, engineers, and architects, into Nepal.

8. Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment

Credit is generally allocated on market terms, although special credit arrangements exist for farmers and rural producers through the Agricultural Development Bank of Nepal. Foreign-owned companies can obtain loans on the local market. The private sector has access to a variety of credit and investment instruments. These include public stock and direct loans from finance companies and joint venture commercial banks.

Legal, regulatory, and accounting systems are neither fully transparent nor consistent with international norms. Though auditing is mandatory, professional accounting standards are low, and practitioners may be poorly trained. As a result, published financial reports can be unreliable, and investors often rely on general business reputations unless companies use international accounting standards.

Nepal moved to full convertibility for current account transactions when it accepted Article VIII obligations of IMF’s Articles of Agreement in May 1994. The GON and NRB refrain from imposing restrictions on payments and transfers for current international transactions. Foreign investors can access credit locally, but the investor must be incorporated in Nepal under the Companies Act of 2006 and listed on the stock exchange.

Money and Banking System, Hostile Takeovers

Nepal’s bank assets totaled about USD 21.75 billion as of February 2016, and deposits equaled USD 17.54 billion. As of July 2015, 2.68 percent of the total asset base was estimated to be non-performing. Considering the size of its economy, Nepal has a large number of banks and financial institutions (BFIs). Foreign commercial lending is scarce and expensive. Currently, there are no resident or non-resident foreign commercial banks that have standby credit limits for loans of a maturity of more than one year. There is no regulatory system to encourage and facilitate portfolio investment in the industrial sector. Lack of transparency or regular reporting of reliable corporate information also presents problems for potential foreign investors.

Nepal has no reported cases of hostile takeovers in the banking system. The Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) has promoted mergers in the financial sector and published merger bylaws in 2011 to help better regulate the banking sector. Since 2011, a total of 78 BFIs have merged into 30 local institutions (as of July 2015). As of January 2016, there were 30 commercial banks, 73 development banks, and 48 finance companies registered with the NRB. This total does not include micro finance financial institutions, savings and credit cooperatives, non-government organizations (NGOs), and other institutions, which may function as BFIs. There are no legal provisions to defend against hostile takeovers.

9. Competition from State-Owned Enterprises

There are 37 state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Nepal, including Nepal Telecom, Nepal Airlines Corporation, and the Nepal Electricity Authority. Since 1993, Nepal has initiated numerous market policy and regulatory reforms in an effort to open eligible government-controlled sectors to domestic and foreign private investment. These efforts have had mixed results. The majority of private investment has been made in manufacturing and tourism – sectors where there is either little government interest or the existing state-owned enterprises perform poorly. Most government-controlled sectors are not open for foreign investment.

The government maintains a list of SOEs on the Ministry of Finance’s website (http://mof.gov.np/en/archive-documents/soe-information--yellow-book-29.html). Information on the SOEs’ annual performance can be found on this website.

Corporate governance of SOEs remains a challenge, and executive positions have reportedly been filled by people connected to politically appointed government ministers. Board seats are generally allocated to senior government officials, and the SOEs are often required to consult with government officials before making any major business decisions. A 2011 executive order mandates a competitive and merit-based selection process, but has encountered resistance within some ministries. Third-party market analysts consider most Nepali SOEs to be poorly managed and characterized by excessive government control and political interference. The court system appears to favor SOEs over private entities. According to local economic analysts, SOEs are sometimes given preference for government tenders, although official policy states that SOEs and private companies are to compete under the same terms and conditions.

Private enterprises do not have the same access to finance as SOEs. Private enterprises mostly rely on commercial banks and financial institutions for business and project financing. SOEs also have access to financing from state-owned banks, development banks, and other state-owned investment vehicles. Similar concessions or facilities are not granted to any private enterprises.

OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of SOEs

The World Bank in Nepal assesses corporate governance benchmarks (both law and practice) against the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, focusing on companies listed on the stock market. Awareness of the importance of corporate governance is growing. The NRB has introduced higher corporate governance standards for banks and other financial institutions. Under the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, the World Bank recommended in 2011 that the GON strengthen capital market institutions and overhaul the Office of the Company Registrar (OCR). Although some reforms have been initiated many have not been finalized and no reforms have been instituted at the OCR.

Corporate governance of SOEs is poor, and executive positions are usually filled by individuals reportedly connected to politically appointed government ministers. Board seats are generally allocated to senior government officials, and the SOEs are often required to consult with government officials before making major business decisions. The Privatization Act of 1994 generally does not discriminate between national and foreign investors; however, in cases where proposals from two or more investors are identical, the government gives priority to Nepali investors.

Sovereign Wealth Funds

There are no sovereign wealth funds in Nepal.

10. Responsible Business Conduct

Government laws, policies, and rules concerning responsible business conduct (RBC), including environmental and social standards, are in place. However, government agencies and officials responsible for enforcing them have been criticized for failing to fulfill their responsibilities. The government has not drafted a national action plan for RBC, and does not factor RBC policies into procurement decisions. Workers’ organizations and unions are the most vocal entities promoting or monitoring RBC. There are no independent NGOs or investment funds focusing on promoting or monitoring RBC. Other than the Department of Labor, which works with workers’ organizations and unions, other government agencies do not encourage foreign and local enterprises to follow generally accepted RBC principles.

The GON does not maintain a national contact point for OECD MNE guidelines nor does it encourage adherence to OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Afflicted and High-Risk Areas. There are virtually no extractive industries in Nepal, and the country does not participate in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.

11. Political Violence

In September 2015, Nepal adopted a new constitution – a key step in Nepal’s post-conflict, democratic transition. In the Terai region (along Nepal’s southern border with India), ethnic and caste groups protested elements of the constitution. The dissatisfaction led to widespread strikes across the Terai and blockages along the India-Nepal border that halted cross-border trade and transit. The disruptions across the Terai lasted from August 2015 until February 2016. Some protests resulted in violent clashes with security personnel, and about 50 protesters and police were killed.

Criminal violence, sometimes conducted under the guise of political activism, remains a problem, though a declining one. Bandhs (general strikes) called by political parties and other agitating groups sometimes halt transport and shut down businesses, sometimes nationwide. Americans and other Westerners are generally not targets of violence.

Business owners, especially those in the Terai, the southern plains bordering India, have been the target of extortion and kidnapping by political party activists and criminal groups aligned with them. To extort ransom, armed groups have targeted business entrepreneurs and local government employees, but generally not foreigners. Most of these criminal acts took place in the Central and Eastern Terai regions, and have decreased significantly in recent years.

U.S. citizens who travel to or reside in Nepal are urged to register with the Consular Section of the Embassy by accessing the Department of State’s travel registration site at https://step.state.gov/step, or by personal appearance at the Consular Section, located at the U.S. Embassy Kathmandu. The Consular Section can provide updated information on travel and security, and can be reached through the Embassy switchboard at (977) (1) 423-4500, by fax at (977) (1) 400-7281, by email at mailto:consktm@state.gov, or online at http://nepal.usembassy.gov

U.S. citizens also should consult the Department of State’s Consular Information Sheet for Nepal and Worldwide Caution Public Announcement via the Internet on the Department of State’s home page at http://travel.state.gov or by calling 1-888-407-4747 toll free in the United States and Canada, or, for callers outside the United States and Canada, a regular toll line at 1-202-501-4444. These numbers are available from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except U.S. federal holidays).

12. Corruption

Corruption, including bribery, raises the costs and risks of doing business. Corruption has a corrosive impact on both market opportunities overseas for U.S. companies and the broader business climate. It also deters international investment, stifles economic growth and development, distorts prices, and undermines the rule of law.

The Commission for the Investigation of Abuse and Authority (CIAA) is the constitutional body for corruption control. The 2015 constitution empowers the CIAA to conduct “investigations of any abuse of authority committed through corruption by any person holding public office.” CIAA arrests and investigations tend to focus on lower level government bureaucrats. According to the Corruption Perception Index 2015 released by Transparency International (TI) in December 2015, Nepal ranked 130th among 167 countries, placing it in the range of “highly corrupt” countries.

It is important for U.S. companies, irrespective of their size, to assess the business climate in the relevant market in which they will be operating or investing, and to have an effective compliance program or measures to prevent and detect corruption, including foreign bribery. U.S. individuals and firms operating or investing in Nepal should take the time to become familiar with the relevant anticorruption laws of both Nepal and the United States in order to properly comply with them, and where appropriate, they should seek the advice of legal counsel.

The U.S. Government seeks to level the global playing field for U.S. businesses by encouraging other countries to take steps to criminalize their own companies’ acts of corruption, including bribery of foreign public officials, by requiring them to uphold their obligations under relevant international conventions. A U.S. firm that believes a competitor is seeking to use bribery of a foreign public official in international business, for example to secure a contract, should bring this to the attention of appropriate U.S. agencies, as noted below.

UN Anticorruption Convention, OECD Convention on Combatting Bribery

The United Nations Convention Against Corruption entered into force on December 14, 2005, and there were 178 parties to it as of December 2015 (see http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/signatories.html). The UN Convention requires countries to establish criminal and other offences to cover a wide range of acts of corruption, from basic forms of corruption such as bribery and solicitation, embezzlement, and trading in influence to the concealment and laundering of the proceeds of corruption. The Convention contains transnational business bribery provisions that are functionally similar to those in the OECD Anti-bribery Convention and contains provisions on private sector auditing and books and records requirements. Other provisions address matters such as prevention, international cooperation, and asset recovery. Nepal is a signatory to the UN Convention and ratified it in 2011.

Resources to Report Corruption

Mr. Shridhar Sapkota
Secretary
Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority
CIAA Headquarter, P.O. Box No. 9996, Tangal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Phone: +9771-4440151, 4429688, 4432708
Fax: +9771-4440128, 4440104
Email: mailto:akhtiyar@ntc.net.np

International nongovernmental organization:

Mr. Bharat Bahadur Thapa
President
Transparency International Nepal (TIN)
P.O. Box 11486, Chakhkhu Bakhkhu Marga, New Baneshwor, Kathmandu
Phone: +977 1 4475112, 4475262
Fax: + 977 1 4475112
Email: mailto:trans@tinepal.org

Local nongovernmental organization:

Prof. Dr. Srikrishna Shrestha
President
Pro Public
P.O. Box: 14307, Gautambuddha Marg, Annamnagar
Phone: +977-01-4268681, 4265023; Fax: +977-01-4268022
Email: mailto:propublic@wlink.com.np

13. Bilateral Investment Agreements

Bilateral Taxation Treaties

Nepal does not have a bilateral investment treaty or free trade agreement with the United States. Nepal has bilateral investment treaties with the United Kingdom, Finland, France, Germany, India, and Mauritius. Nepal signed a Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (BIPPA) with India in October 2011, but the agreement has not yet entered into force. Nepal does not have a bilateral tax treaty with the United States.

14. OPIC and Other Investment Insurance Programs

The Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) is free to operate in Nepal without restriction. Services include direct loans and loan guarantees, political risk insurance, and investment funds. Nepal is also a member of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. There is an OPIC agreement between Nepal and the United States that was signed in 1963. OPIC has yet to fund a project in Nepal.

15. Labor

Nepal’s labor force is characterized by a shortage of skilled workers and political party-affiliated unions. In the past, politicized unions have staged frequent strikes, often unrelated to working conditions. Under Nepali law, it is difficult to dismiss employees.

According to the 2010-2011 Nepal Living Standards Survey, the country’s literacy rate was 56.6 percent, with the literacy rate for males at 71.6 percent and 44.5 percent for females. Vocational and technical training are poorly developed, and the national system of higher education is overwhelmed by high enrollment and inadequate resources. Many secondary school and college graduates are unable to find jobs commensurate with their education. Hiring non-Nepali workers is not, with the exception of India, a viable option as the employment of foreigners is restricted. The Department of Immigration must approve the employment of foreigners for all positions, except the most senior ones.

The GON is reviewing the Labor Act, but it is unclear if legislation will be approved by Parliament. Nepal’s enforcement of regulations to monitor labor abuses and health and safety standards in low-wage assembly operations is weak. Operations in small towns and rural areas are rarely monitored. International labor rights are recognized within domestic law. There were no new labor-related laws enacted in the past year.

Labor laws differentiate between layoffs and firing. In some cases, Nepal’s labor laws have forced industries to retain employees, even after a business closed. Workers at state-owned enterprises often receive generous severance packages if they are laid off. Unemployment insurance does not exist. As a result of burdensome labor laws that make it difficult to fire an employee, many private enterprises hire workers on a contract basis for jobs that are not temporary in nature. In some commercial banks and other businesses, security guards, drivers, and administrative staff jobs are filled by contract workers.

By law, labor unions in Nepal are independent of the government and employer. In practice, however, all labor unions are affiliated with political parties, and have significant influence with the government. The constitution provides for the freedom to establish and join unions and associations. It permits restrictions on unions only in cases of subversion, sedition, or similar conditions. Labor laws permit strikes, except by employees in essential services such as water supply, electricity, and telecommunications. Sixty percent of a union’s membership must vote in favor of a strike for it to be legal, though this law is often ignored. Laws also empower the government to halt a strike or suspend a union’s activities if the union disturbs the peace or adversely affect the nation’s economic interests; in practice, this is rarely done.

Total union participation is estimated at about one million, or about 10 percent of the total workforce, much of which is employed in informal sectors. The three largest trade unions are affiliated with political parties. The Maoist-affiliated All Nepal Trade Union Federation (ANTUF) is the most active, and its organizing tactics have led in the past to violent clashes with other trade unions in the past. The ANTUF and its splinter group, the ANTUF-R, are aggressive in their defense of members and frequently engage in disputes with management. A U.S. company in Nepal was shut down twice in 2013 and 2014 by workers associated with the CPN-M-affiliated ANTUF-R.

Labor union agitation is often conducted in violation of valid contracts and existing laws, and unions are rarely held accountable for their actions. Unions, particularly the ANTUF-R, have targeted joint ventures involving foreign investment and hotels. Collective bargaining is only applied in fixing workers’ salaries, a process in which trade unions, employers, and government representatives actively engage. The Department of Labor has a dispute resolution mechanism that addresses disputes in businesses and state-owned enterprises.

Strikes are a common feature in Nepal. Although most strikes last a day or two, political parties in the Terai – the region bordering India that is home to most of Nepal’s industry – called for a general strike in August 2015 that lasted six months.

The most recent Human Rights Report can be found at: www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/index.htm. The Department of Labor’s 2014 Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor is available at:

http://www.dol.gov/ilab/reports/child-labor/nepal.htm

16. Foreign Trade Zones/Free Ports/Trade Facilitation

Nepal has no Foreign Trade Zones or Free Trade Zones, but wants to establish a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Bhairahawa, near the Indian border. Under draft legislation, an industry exporting 75 percent or more of its products would be entitled to apply for a space in a SEZ and import raw materials and capital goods without paying custom duties, excise taxes, or sales taxes. An industry located in a SEZ would be exempt from paying income tax for five years from the date of commencement of commercial operations; after five years, the company would pay 50 percent of the normal tax. Additionally, such companies would be exempt from the value added tax for imported machinery, equipment, spare parts, and raw materials.

17. Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment Statistics

Table 2: Key Macroeconomic Data, U.S. FDI in Host Country/Economy

 

Host Country Statistical source*

USG or international statistical source

USG or International Source of Data: BEA; IMF; Eurostat; UNCTAD, Other

Economic Data

Year

Amount

Year

Amount

 

Host Country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ($M USD)

2015

2014

$21,290

$19,700

2015

2014

N/A

$19,770

www.worldbank.org/en/country

*Nepal Rastra Bank http://nrb.org.np/ofg/policy.php?tp=monetary_policy&&vw=15

Table 3: Sources and Destination of FDI

Direct Investment (Approved) from/in Counterpart Economy Data, FY 2013/14

From Top Five Sources/To Top Five Destinations (US Dollars, Millions)

Inward Direct Investment

Outward Direct Investment

Total Inward

201.07

100%

Outward investment is not permitted under Nepali law

   

China

73.14

36.4%

N/A

N/A

 

India

65.40

32.5%

N/A

N/A

 

South Korea

20.30

10.1%

N/A

N/A

 

Hong Kong

10.72

5.3%

N/A

N/A

 

USA

5.36

1.7%

N/A

N/A

 

“0” reflects amounts rounded to +/- USD 500,000.

18. Contact for More Information

  • NAME: Kevin Price
  • TITLE: Economic and Commercial Officer
  • ADDRESS OF MISSION: Embassy of the United States of America, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • TELEPHONE NUMBER: +977 1 423 4192
  • EMAIL ADDRESS: pricekc@state.gov

We’re running a survey to find out how you use ecoi.net. We would be grateful if you could help us improve our services.

It takes about 7-15 minutes.

To take the survey, click here. Thank you!

ecoi.net survey 2025