Document #1041696
IRB – Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (Author)
Country Reports 1998.
Country Reports 1998 states that the
government of General Abubakar has not used the practice of trying
civilians before military tribunals (1999, 317).
Correspondence from the Secretary for
Organisation of the Committee for the Defence of Human Rights
(CDHR) - a Lagos based pro-democracy coalition whose "activities
include rendering legal aid and assistance to indigent victims of
human rights violations, human rights campaigns and education
encompassing workshops, seminars and publications" - indicates
that
Under a military regime, if a civilian commits assault on or manslaughter of a member of the armed forces, he might be tried in a military court. The penalty for murder is death, manslaughter is life imprisonment while assault is punishable with weeks, or months of imprisonment sometimes with an option of a fine or both. The offences in question are bailable but at the discretion of the court. It is however, difficult to grant bail on charges of murder. Recent development suggests fair trial may be possible (27 May 1999).
Both the Director of Africa Programs for
the International Human Rights Law Group and the Director of the
Centre for Democracy and Development stated that it is much more
likely than previously that a person will now receive a fair trial
(20 May 1999; 21 May 1999). The latter group is a British
non-governmental organization dedicated to research and education
on West Africa, while the International Human Rights Law Group has
a "fairly extensive program in Nigeria and works a lot with human
rights groups." Both of these sources also said that it is
difficult to indicate what would happen to a civilian suspected of
an infraction against a member of the military since much depends
on the circumstances of the alleged infraction. They added that it
is important to distinguish between what is outlined in law and
what actually occurs. They both expressed their understanding that
the law provides for a civilian to be tried within the normal court
system.
The Director of the Centre for Democracy
and Development stated that until recently the chances of a fair
trial were poor for a civilian charged with assault or murder of a
member of the military. He stated that it is difficult to say what
would happen now, but suggested that the military would be
"reluctant" to extend "summary justice." He stated that the
civilian could be arrested and charged but that there is now "much
more certainty" that the case would go to a civilian court (21 May
1999).
The Director of Africa Programs claimed
that within the normal court system, the military could still
influence the outcome of a trial, both in the past and present.
Nevertheless, he stated that the likelihood of the military using
this influence would depend on the circumstances of the incident,
such as whether it involved a high-ranking officer or involved
something "considered an offence against the state" (20 May
1999).
This Response was prepared after
researching publicly accessible information currently available to
the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is
not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any
particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Please find below the
list of additional sources consulted in researching this
Information Request.
References
Centre for Democracy and Development,
London. 21 May 1999. Telephone interview with Director.
Committee for the Defence of Human
Rights (CDHR), Lagos, Nigeria. 27 May 1999. Correspondence from
Secretary for Organisation.
Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices for 1998. 1999. United States Department of
State. Washington, DC.
International Human Rights Law Group. 20
May 1999. Telephone interview with Director of Africa Programs.
Attachment
U.S. Department of Justice, Washington.
1993. Obi N.I. Ebbe. World Factbook of Criminal Justice
Systems. 6 pgs. [Internet] www.ojp.usdoj.gov [Accessed 31 May.
1999]
Additional Sources Consulted
Resource Centre. Nigeria country file.
November 1998-present.
_____. Nigeria: Amnesty International
country file. November 1998-present.
Electronic sources: IRB Databases,
LEXIS/NEXIS, Internet, REFWORLD, World News Connection (WNC).
Four non-documentary sources contacted
could not provide information on the requested subject.