Political Rights | 26 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 37 / 60 |
While Paraguay’s elections are generally credible and well organized, politics have historically been dominated by the conservative Colorado Party, and most recently by a faction of the party led by former President Horacio Cartes. Corruption and organized crime remain widespread. Journalists face legal and other pressure and sometimes violence in response to their work, and many practice self-censorship. Constitutional guarantees of due process are poorly upheld. Gender-based violence is persistent. The rights of rural and Indigenous people are threatened by commercial development and associated environmental damage.
- In February, allies of former President Horacio Cartes in the Senate led a successful vote to expel Senator Kattya González of the opposition Encuentro Nacional (National Meeting) party over alleged administrative misconduct. Rights groups said that the vote against González violated due process, and the development prompted protests in the capital. González—known for criticism of government corruption and one of only a few prominent opposition figures in the country—said the vote was a move to silence her.
- In November, a new law that granted the government power to shut down nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that failed to comply with new reporting regulations took effect. The measure, also supported by Cartes’s political faction, required groups to regularly document the sources and destination of their funding and submit the information to a government register. Opposition parties, UN experts, and local and international rights organizations said the law would effectively allow the government to persecute groups it considered hostile. The rights group Amnesty International compared it to similar measures in effect in Russia and Nicaragua. Faith groups, political parties, and football clubs were exempt from its provisions.
- The news portal ABC Color reported in July that according to public documentation, at least 49 percent of Paraguay’s lawmakers had placed children, spouses, and other relatives in government jobs, drawing combined salaries—funded by taxpayers—worth 18,800,000,000 guarani ($2.5 million) annually.
- In August, police raided the home of Eulalio Gomes, a rancher and Colorado Party deputy, in relations to a narcotrafficking and money-laundering case. Gomes was killed in a subsequent shootout with police. Paraguay’s public prosecutor said Gomes and his son had been indicted in a trafficking scheme involving a Brazilian organized crime group just before the raid took place. The Gomes family denied the charges and accused the police of excessive force. Analysts said the episode underlined institutional weakness, corruption, and insecurity in the country.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 3 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 3 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 2 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 2 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 2 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 4 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 2 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 2 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 2 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 3 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2 / 4 |