Freedom in the World 2025 - Pakistani Kashmir

Not Free
30
/ 100
Political Rights 9 / 40
Civil Liberties 21 / 60
Last Year's Score & Status
29 / 100 Not Free
A country or territory’s Freedom in the World status depends on its aggregate Political Rights score, on a scale of 0–40, and its aggregate Civil Liberties score, on a scale of 0–60. See the methodology.
* Indicates a territory as opposed to an independent country.
 

Note

Freedom in the World reports assess the level of political rights and civil liberties in a given geographical area, regardless of whether they are affected by the state, nonstate actors, or foreign powers. Related, disputed, or occupied territories are sometimes assessed separately if they meet certain criteria, including distinct conditions for political rights and civil liberties and boundaries that are sufficiently stable to allow year-on-year comparisons. For more information, see the report methodology and FAQ.

Overview

Pakistani Kashmir is administered as two territories: Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). Each has an elected assembly and government with limited autonomy, but they lack the parliamentary representation and other rights of Pakistani provinces, and Pakistani federal institutions have predominant influence over security, the courts, and most important policy matters. Politics within the two territories are carefully managed to promote the idea of Kashmir’s eventual accession to Pakistan. Freedoms of expression and association, and any political activity deemed contrary to Pakistan’s policy on Kashmir, are restricted.

Key Developments in 2024

  • The Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), a broad civil society alliance in AJK that united leftist and nationalist groups with associations of traders and professionals, continued to press its demands for economic and governance reforms during the year, challenging state restrictions on freedom of assembly. In addition to other, smaller protests, the JAAC organized a week of marches, strikes, and demonstrations in May; while authorities responded with tear gas, internet blackouts, arrests, and gunfire that killed three protesters, the government eventually granted the committee’s demands regarding wheat and electricity prices and the privileges enjoyed by elite public officials. In November, however, the AJK government issued a presidential ordinance that would require protest organizers to obtain registration and permission in advance, with violations drawing penalties of up to three years in prison. The JAAC mounted fresh demonstrations in opposition to the measure in December, compelling the government to withdraw its ordinance and grant several other economic and governance concessions.
  • Public advocacy on behalf of the AJK protest movement carried the risk of reprisals from the authorities. In one prominent case, Kashmiri poet Ahmed Farhad Shah was abducted in May from his residence in Islamabad, apparently by intelligence agents, after using social media to share information about the demonstrations in AJK. He later reappeared in the custody of the AJK police after his wife petitioned a court in Islamabad, and he was released after about a month in detention.
  • In GB, the territory’s own Awami Action Committee (AAC)—led by traders’ associations, political and religious groups, and civil society activists—organized a series of mass mobilizations in January to advance a 15-point list of demands related to GB’s economic conditions and lack of political autonomy. The government granted some concessions on wheat prices and taxes, but the AAC persisted with its campaign, holding events throughout the year. AAC leaders spoke out against the authorities’ efforts to file terrorism and cybercrime cases against them, which restricted their ability to travel and access services.
  • The high-profile abduction case of Falak Noor highlighted GB’s lack of a statutory minimum age for marriage and the weakness of legal protections against forced and child marriages. Her parents said that the girl—who was reportedly 12 or 13 years old, according to legal documents—had been kidnapped, taken to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan, and forcibly married, but the GB Chief Court ruled in April that she could remain with her purported husband and his family. Human rights activists called for the marriage age to be set at 18 in accordance with international law.
  • In December, a GB antiterrorism court sentenced former Chief Minister Khalid Khurshid Khan (2020–23) of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party to 34 years in prison for supposedly threatening security institutions in remarks he made at a 2023 PTI rally.

This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.

For additional background information, see last year’s full report.

 

Political Rights

A Electoral Process

A1 0-4 pts
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 1 / 4
A2 0-4 pts
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 2 / 4
A3 0-4 pts
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 1 / 4

B Political Pluralism and Participation

B1 0-4 pts
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 1 / 4
B2 0-4 pts
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 1 / 4
B3 0-4 pts
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? 1 / 4
B4 0-4 pts
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? 1 / 4

C Functioning of Government

C1 0-4 pts
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 1 / 4
C2 0-4 pts
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 1 / 4
C3 0-4 pts
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? 1 / 4
Add Q
Is the government or occupying power deliberately changing the ethnic composition of a country or territory so as to destroy a culture or tip the political balance in favor of another group? -2

Civil Liberties

D Freedom of Expression and Belief

D1 0-4 pts
Are there free and independent media? 1 / 4
D2 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? 1 / 4
D3 0-4 pts
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? 2 / 4
D4 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? 2 / 4

E Associational and Organizational Rights

E1 0-4 pts
Is there freedom of assembly? 2 / 4

Score Change: The score improved from 1 to 2 because civil society groups successfully organized mass protests during the year, despite repressive responses from the authorities.

E2 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? 1 / 4
E3 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? 2 / 4

F Rule of Law

F1 0-4 pts
Is there an independent judiciary? 1 / 4
F2 0-4 pts
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? 1 / 4
F3 0-4 pts
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? 2 / 4
F4 0-4 pts
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? 0 / 4

G Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights

G1 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? 2 / 4
G2 0-4 pts
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? 2 / 4
G3 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? 1 / 4
G4 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? 1 / 4
 

We’re running a survey to find out how you use ecoi.net. We would be grateful if you could help us improve our services.

It takes about 7-15 minutes.

To take the survey, click here. Thank you!

ecoi.net survey 2025