Political Rights | 9 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 21 / 60 |
Freedom in the World reports assess the level of political rights and civil liberties in a given geographical area, regardless of whether they are affected by the state, nonstate actors, or foreign powers. Related, disputed, or occupied territories are sometimes assessed separately if they meet certain criteria, including distinct conditions for political rights and civil liberties and boundaries that are sufficiently stable to allow year-on-year comparisons. For more information, see the report methodology and FAQ.
Pakistani Kashmir is administered as two territories: Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). Each has an elected assembly and government with limited autonomy, but they lack the parliamentary representation and other rights of Pakistani provinces, and Pakistani federal institutions have predominant influence over security, the courts, and most important policy matters. Politics within the two territories are carefully managed to promote the idea of Kashmir’s eventual accession to Pakistan. Freedoms of expression and association, and any political activity deemed contrary to Pakistan’s policy on Kashmir, are restricted.
- The Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), a broad civil society alliance in AJK that united leftist and nationalist groups with associations of traders and professionals, continued to press its demands for economic and governance reforms during the year, challenging state restrictions on freedom of assembly. In addition to other, smaller protests, the JAAC organized a week of marches, strikes, and demonstrations in May; while authorities responded with tear gas, internet blackouts, arrests, and gunfire that killed three protesters, the government eventually granted the committee’s demands regarding wheat and electricity prices and the privileges enjoyed by elite public officials. In November, however, the AJK government issued a presidential ordinance that would require protest organizers to obtain registration and permission in advance, with violations drawing penalties of up to three years in prison. The JAAC mounted fresh demonstrations in opposition to the measure in December, compelling the government to withdraw its ordinance and grant several other economic and governance concessions.
- Public advocacy on behalf of the AJK protest movement carried the risk of reprisals from the authorities. In one prominent case, Kashmiri poet Ahmed Farhad Shah was abducted in May from his residence in Islamabad, apparently by intelligence agents, after using social media to share information about the demonstrations in AJK. He later reappeared in the custody of the AJK police after his wife petitioned a court in Islamabad, and he was released after about a month in detention.
- In GB, the territory’s own Awami Action Committee (AAC)—led by traders’ associations, political and religious groups, and civil society activists—organized a series of mass mobilizations in January to advance a 15-point list of demands related to GB’s economic conditions and lack of political autonomy. The government granted some concessions on wheat prices and taxes, but the AAC persisted with its campaign, holding events throughout the year. AAC leaders spoke out against the authorities’ efforts to file terrorism and cybercrime cases against them, which restricted their ability to travel and access services.
- The high-profile abduction case of Falak Noor highlighted GB’s lack of a statutory minimum age for marriage and the weakness of legal protections against forced and child marriages. Her parents said that the girl—who was reportedly 12 or 13 years old, according to legal documents—had been kidnapped, taken to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan, and forcibly married, but the GB Chief Court ruled in April that she could remain with her purported husband and his family. Human rights activists called for the marriage age to be set at 18 in accordance with international law.
- In December, a GB antiterrorism court sentenced former Chief Minister Khalid Khurshid Khan (2020–23) of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party to 34 years in prison for supposedly threatening security institutions in remarks he made at a 2023 PTI rally.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 1 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 2 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 1 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 1 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 1 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 1 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 1 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 1 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 1 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 1 / 4 |
Is the government or occupying power deliberately changing the ethnic composition of a country or territory so as to destroy a culture or tip the political balance in favor of another group? | -2 |
Are there free and independent media? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 1 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 2 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 2 / 4 |
Score Change: The score improved from 1 to 2 because civil society groups successfully organized mass protests during the year, despite repressive responses from the authorities.
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 2 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 1 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 2 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 0 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 1 / 4 |