Political Rights | 28 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 45 / 60 |
While Namibia is a multiparty democracy, the SWAPO Party has ruled since independence. Protections for civil liberties are generally robust. Minority ethnic groups accuse the government of favoring the majority Ovambo ethnic group in allocating public goods and services. The nomadic San people experience disproportionate poverty and societal marginalization. Other human rights concerns include police brutality and discrimination against women and LGBT+ people.
- In February, President Hage Geingob died unexpectedly after a short illness. He was immediately replaced by Vice President Nangolo Mbumba in accordance with the Namibian Constitution. The newly inaugurated president made it clear that he had no political ambition beyond serving out the remainder of Geingob’s term, which expires in March 2025.
- In December, SWAPO’s Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah was declared the winner of the presidential election with 58 percent of the vote, and would become Namibia’s first woman president. SWAPO also retained its majority in concurrent elections to the National Assembly, taking 53 percent of the vote. While the opposition remained fragmented, opposition parties’ increased representation brought SWAPO to the edge of losing the majority it has held since independence.
- However, the elections were marred by ballot paper shortages, severe technical malfunctions, and staffing issues, prompting the president to extend voting at select polling stations. Key opposition parties claimed the extension was illegal, rejected the results, and vowed to challenge the election outcome in court. The African Union’s election observers assigned the Electoral Commission of Namibia a transparency score of just 50 percent.
- In April, the University of Namibia banned political activities on its campuses nationwide, prompting criticism from independent analysts and opposition politicians who accused the university of curtailing freedom of expression and association. In September, the university’s management attracted further criticism after the SWAPO Party’s youth organization held a rally at the university’s Windhoek campus in spite of the ban.
- In June, Namibia’s High Court in Windhoek struck down two colonial-era laws that criminalized same-sex relations between men. The government appealed the ruling, setting up a legal battle at the Supreme Court.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because the presidential election was marred by ballot shortages and technical and staffing problems.
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because the legislative elections were marred by ballot shortages and technical and staffing problems.
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 3 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 3 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 3 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 3 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2 / 4 |
Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 2 due to a persistent pattern of high-level corruption scandals that do not result in effective investigations or accountability for those accused.
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 2 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 4 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3 / 4 |
Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 due to a ban on political activity at the country’s main university that was not enforced against government supporters.
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 4 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 3 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 3 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 3 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 3 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 2 / 4 |