Freedom in the World 2025 - Namibia

Free
73
/ 100
Political Rights 28 / 40
Civil Liberties 45 / 60
Last Year's Score & Status
77 / 100 Free
A country or territory’s Freedom in the World status depends on its aggregate Political Rights score, on a scale of 0–40, and its aggregate Civil Liberties score, on a scale of 0–60. See the methodology.
 
 

Overview

While Namibia is a multiparty democracy, the SWAPO Party has ruled since independence. Protections for civil liberties are generally robust. Minority ethnic groups accuse the government of favoring the majority Ovambo ethnic group in allocating public goods and services. The nomadic San people experience disproportionate poverty and societal marginalization. Other human rights concerns include police brutality and discrimination against women and LGBT+ people.

Key Developments in 2024

  • In February, President Hage Geingob died unexpectedly after a short illness. He was immediately replaced by Vice President Nangolo Mbumba in accordance with the Namibian Constitution. The newly inaugurated president made it clear that he had no political ambition beyond serving out the remainder of Geingob’s term, which expires in March 2025.
  • In December, SWAPO’s Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah was declared the winner of the presidential election with 58 percent of the vote, and would become Namibia’s first woman president. SWAPO also retained its majority in concurrent elections to the National Assembly, taking 53 percent of the vote. While the opposition remained fragmented, opposition parties’ increased representation brought SWAPO to the edge of losing the majority it has held since independence.
  • However, the elections were marred by ballot paper shortages, severe technical malfunctions, and staffing issues, prompting the president to extend voting at select polling stations. Key opposition parties claimed the extension was illegal, rejected the results, and vowed to challenge the election outcome in court. The African Union’s election observers assigned the Electoral Commission of Namibia a transparency score of just 50 percent.
  • In April, the University of Namibia banned political activities on its campuses nationwide, prompting criticism from independent analysts and opposition politicians who accused the university of curtailing freedom of expression and association. In September, the university’s management attracted further criticism after the SWAPO Party’s youth organization held a rally at the university’s Windhoek campus in spite of the ban.
  • In June, Namibia’s High Court in Windhoek struck down two colonial-era laws that criminalized same-sex relations between men. The government appealed the ruling, setting up a legal battle at the Supreme Court.

This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.

For additional background information, see last year’s full report.

Political Rights

A Electoral Process

A1 0-4 pts
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 3 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because the presidential election was marred by ballot shortages and technical and staffing problems.

A2 0-4 pts
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 3 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 because the legislative elections were marred by ballot shortages and technical and staffing problems.

A3 0-4 pts
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 3 / 4

B Political Pluralism and Participation

B1 0-4 pts
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? 3 / 4
B2 0-4 pts
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 3 / 4
B3 0-4 pts
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? 3 / 4
B4 0-4 pts
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? 3 / 4

C Functioning of Government

C1 0-4 pts
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 3 / 4
C2 0-4 pts
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 2 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 2 due to a persistent pattern of high-level corruption scandals that do not result in effective investigations or accountability for those accused.

 

C3 0-4 pts
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? 2 / 4

Civil Liberties

D Freedom of Expression and Belief

D1 0-4 pts
Are there free and independent media? 3 / 4
D2 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? 4 / 4
D3 0-4 pts
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? 3 / 4

Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 due to a ban on political activity at the country’s main university that was not enforced against government supporters.

D4 0-4 pts
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? 3 / 4

E Associational and Organizational Rights

E1 0-4 pts
Is there freedom of assembly? 3 / 4
E2 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? 4 / 4
E3 0-4 pts
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? 4 / 4

F Rule of Law

F1 0-4 pts
Is there an independent judiciary? 3 / 4
F2 0-4 pts
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? 3 / 4
F3 0-4 pts
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? 3 / 4
F4 0-4 pts
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? 2 / 4

G Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights

G1 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? 3 / 4
G2 0-4 pts
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? 3 / 4
G3 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? 2 / 4
G4 0-4 pts
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? 2 / 4
 

We’re running a survey to find out how you use ecoi.net. We would be grateful if you could help us improve our services.

It takes about 7-15 minutes.

To take the survey, click here. Thank you!

ecoi.net survey 2025