Political Rights | 27 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 42 / 60 |
After three decades of rule by the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), an opposition coalition came to power through competitive elections in 2020. A period of instability in the governing coalition led to fresh elections in 2023, yielding a new parliamentary majority and government. Montenegro is home to dynamic media and civil society sectors, and civil liberties are generally respected, but corruption and dysfunction in politics and the judicial system remain persistent problems.
- After months of intraparty tensions, President Jakov Milatović left the ruling Europe Now Movement of Prime Minister Milojko Spajić in February. The two leaders backed rival lists in September local council elections in Podgorica, though by December both lists had joined a coalition government in the city. Concurrent local elections in Kotor remained unresolved at year’s end.
- In July, Prime Minister Spajić significantly expanded his government to include members of the pro-Serb coalition For the Future of Montenegro and the Bosniak Party, creating a 32-member cabinet that would serve to push reform legislation through the 81-seat parliament. The arrangement threatened to exacerbate a pattern in which the government had enacted laws through expedited procedures, with little public debate or parliamentary oversight.
- Law enforcement authorities continued to uncover online correspondence and other evidence linking officials from the era of DPS rule to organized crime. In April, former special prosecutor Milivoje Katnić and former assistant police director Zoran Lazović were arrested and charged with abuse of power and the creation of a criminal organization. Separately that month, the director of the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption, Jelena Perović, was arrested for alleged financial malfeasance; an indictment issued in November accused her illegally inflating her compensation and those of others.
- In December, the parliament’s constitutional committee found that three of the six sitting judges on the seven-seat Constitutional Court had met the conditions for retirement and began a process for selecting replacements. The move touched off a political crisis, with President Milatović and the parliamentary opposition—led by the DPS—accusing the governing coalition of violating constitutional procedure, which calls for the court itself to notify the parliament when any of its members have met the conditions for retirement. The opposition withdrew from the parliament’s electoral reform committee and began boycotting parliament sessions, and the dispute was ongoing at year’s end.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 3 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 2 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 3 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 2 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 3 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 2 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 3 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 3 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 3 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 2 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 2 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 3 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 3 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 3 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 3 / 4 |