Political Rights | 1 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 16 / 60 |
Eswatini is a monarchy currently ruled by King Mswati III. The king exercises ultimate authority over all branches of the national government and effectively controls local governance through his influence over traditional chiefs. Political dissent and civic and labor activism are subject to harsh punishment under sedition and other laws. Additional human rights problems include impunity for the abuses committed by security forces and discrimination against women and LGBT+ people.
- In July, a court handed Mduduzi Bacede Mabuza and Mthandeni Dube, former members of parliament who supported prodemocracy reforms, prison sentences of 25 years and 18 years respectively. They had been found guilty in 2023 of terrorism, sedition, and causing deaths and destruction of property that took place during mass prodemocracy demonstrations in 2021. The sentences prompted condemnation from international rights groups, which called the charges against them baseless and a misuse of the justice system to punish dissent.
- In August, the Supreme Court upheld the Suppression of Terrorism Act, as well as restrictive sections of the Sedition and Subversive Activities Act, which authorities have invoked to punish dissent (including in the cases of Mabuza and Dube). International rights groups and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) condemned the ruling, saying it allowed the government to continue misusing the law to restrict free expression, assembly, and other fundamental freedoms.
- In February, Afrobarometer, an independent research institution, reported that perceptions of government corruption were more widespread in Eswatini than in any of the 38 countries surveyed in its 2021–23 study. Eighty-three percent of Swati respondents “gave the government poor marks” on efforts to fight official corruption.
- In November, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of several junior police officers and correctional services officers who had been suspended in 2022 after peacefully presenting the prime minister’s office with a complaint about the failure to implement a promised salary increase. The court’s ruling also ordered the government to implement the salary increase, which had been announced in a 2014 government circular.
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 0 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 0 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 0 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 0 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 0 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 0 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 1 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 0 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 0 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 0 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 2 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 1 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 0 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 1 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 1 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 2 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 1 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 0 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 2 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 1 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 1 / 4 |