Political Rights | 34 / 40 |
Civil Liberties | 48 / 60 |
Croatia is a parliamentary republic that regularly holds free and fair elections. Civil and political rights are generally respected, though corruption in the public sector is a serious issue, and the media has come under increasing pressure. The Romany population, ethnic Serbs, and LGBT+ people face discrimination.
- In April, the ruling Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ), led by Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, won parliamentary elections with 61 of 150 seats in the Sabor—5 less than it had won in 2020. The Social Democratic Party (SDP) took 41 seats, and the remainder were won by smaller parties. Lacking an outright majority, Plenković formed a coalition with the far-right Homeland Movement (DP).
- President Zoran Milanović’s March announcement that he would lead the SDP coalition in the parliamentary election campaign resulted in a Constitutional Court ruling that that unless Milanović first resigned from the presidency, he could not be a candidate on any electoral list or campaign to be nominated as prime minister. Milanovic criticized the ruling and continued to informally preside over the SDP campaign.
- In December, Milanović won the first round of the presidential election with 49 percent of the vote. A second round, in which he would face off against the HDZ’s Dragan Primorac, was set for January 2025. Primorac had won 19 percent of the first-round vote.
- Several developments underscored concerns about corruption. In a March interview, the head of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) alleged that that Croatian officials were interfering with an investigation into alleged mismanagement of European Union (EU) funds afforded to the country following a 2020 earthquake. In September, Plenković’s government pushed ahead with the appointment of a new attorney general who was revealed by media to have had personal communications with a high-profile corruption suspect. In November, Croatia’s health minister was dismissed after being indicted on corruption charges. The EPPO in a November letter to the European Commission expressed concerns about Croatian authorities’ handling of high-profile corruption investigations.
- In March, the parliament passed a law that made leaking information about official police investigations to media a criminal offense punishable with prison time. The law was condemned by the Croatian Journalists’ Association (HND), large segments of the civil society sector, media freedom watchdogs, and the country’s president. Separately, a study by the HND and nonprofit Centre for Democracy and Law released in September found that 40 percent of all lawsuits brought against Croatian media between 2016 and 2023 contained elements of a SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation).
This report has been abridged for Freedom in the World 2025 due to ongoing budget constraints. Freedom in the World is entirely funded by nongovernmental sources such as private foundations, corporations, and individuals like you. Please consider making a donation to support future editions of this vital resource.
For additional background information, see last year’s full report.
Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? | 4 / 4 |
Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? | 4 / 4 |
Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or groupings? | 4 / 4 |
Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? | 4 / 4 |
Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ extrapolitical means? | 3 / 4 |
Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and electoral opportunities? | 3 / 4 |
Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? | 4 / 4 |
Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? | 2 / 4 |
Does the government operate with openness and transparency? | 2 / 4 |
Are there free and independent media? | 2 / 4 |
Score Change: The score declined from 3 to 2 because authorities have exerted increasing pressure on the media, including through SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation) and a new law that made leaking information about official police investigations to media a criminal offense.
Are individuals free to practice and express their religious faith or nonbelief in public and private? | 3 / 4 |
Is there academic freedom, and is the educational system free from extensive political indoctrination? | 3 / 4 |
Are individuals free to express their personal views on political or other sensitive topics without fear of surveillance or retribution? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom of assembly? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom for nongovernmental organizations, particularly those that are engaged in human rights– and governance-related work? | 4 / 4 |
Is there freedom for trade unions and similar professional or labor organizations? | 4 / 4 |
Is there an independent judiciary? | 3 / 4 |
Does due process prevail in civil and criminal matters? | 3 / 4 |
Is there protection from the illegitimate use of physical force and freedom from war and insurgencies? | 3 / 4 |
Do laws, policies, and practices guarantee equal treatment of various segments of the population? | 2 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy freedom of movement, including the ability to change their place of residence, employment, or education? | 4 / 4 |
Are individuals able to exercise the right to own property and establish private businesses without undue interference from state or nonstate actors? | 3 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy personal social freedoms, including choice of marriage partner and size of family, protection from domestic violence, and control over appearance? | 3 / 4 |
Do individuals enjoy equality of opportunity and freedom from economic exploitation? | 3 / 4 |