Document #2121310
International Crisis Group (Author)
Ecuadorians are voting on their next president and legislature as the country grapples with a violent crime wave and economic malaise. In this Q&A, Crisis Group expert Glaeldys González Calanche explains who is running and how the candidates plan to improve the country’s outlook.
Ecuador will choose its president and legislature in 9 February elections against a backdrop of surging criminal violence and persistent economic stagnation. Some polls suggest that the conservative incumbent, Daniel Noboa, will win in a first-round vote, but it is likely that the election will go to a second round on 13 April: with sixteen candidates competing, no contender appears to have enough support to win outright (which would require 50 per cent of the vote, or over 40 per cent with a 10 per cent lead over the nearest rival).
At the top of voters’ concerns is Ecuador’s abrupt transformation from a peaceful country into a battleground for drug traffickers and the armed gangs that work for them. Ecuador has become a key storage and transit hub for Andean cocaine to consumer countries, and criminal organisations are at war with one another to control drug supply chains, above all along the Pacific coast. Their thirst for profit has driven an increase in the murder rate to five times what it was in 2020, turning Ecuador, with a population of less than 18 million, into South America’s most violent country. Five of its cities, including Guayaquil, the country’s biggest port and business capital, are among the ten cities in the world with the highest murder rates, according to 2023 figures.
The gangs have established sway over urban communities and rural areas, enabling them to branch into other illicit activities, particularly extortion, drug sales and illegal mining. Organised crime has run roughshod over Ecuador’s institutions, embedding itself in prisons and corrupting the courts. Judges have released criminals from jail in exchange for large bribes, while gangs have turned prisons into headquarters for recruitment and criminality. Corrupt guards have turned a blind eye to smuggled weapons and ammunition, fuelling prison massacres that have killed more than 450 people since 2021. Criminal groups pay off local government officials to win public contracts for municipal services and to launder money.
Traumatised by the way violence has upended their lives, Ecuadorians have embraced Noboa’s mano dura (iron fist) policies, handing the military a central role in the battle against organised crime. All the candidates, even those on the left, have adopted some version of those policies in their platforms, and Ecuador is set to follow other Latin American countries in entrenching the military at the head of its drug war strategy.
Violence has already marred the election campaign: in mid-January, Eber Ponce, the mayor of the town of Arenillas in the coastal province of El Oro, was killed in an armed attack, and several candidates have been injured or received death threats. The threats drove Pedro Granja, the presidential candidate for the Ecuadorian Socialist Party, to suspend public campaigning.
Politicians are cowed, fearful of becoming targets if they speak out against criminal groups, reject their bribes or raise suspicions of supporting rival groups. The assassination in 2023 of Fernando Villavicencio, a presidential candidate and outspoken critic of criminal outfits and corruption in public life, remains a chilling reminder of what can happen. Villavicencio was shot that August in front of rallygoers in the north of Quito after denouncing threats from a criminal group called Los Choneros that he said had warned him to stop mentioning them in his campaign. Eventually, five people were convicted of his killing, and prosecutors said the two ringleaders were in fact from a rival gang, Los Lobos, one of the biggest organised crime groups in the country. The order to kill Villavicencio, prosecutors said, came from the Latacunga prison, a stronghold of the latter group.
Polls show the contest for the presidency is likely to narrow down to a repeat of the October 2023 election, which pitted Noboa, the youthful scion of Ecuador’s richest family, against Luisa González, a lawyer who is running on her experience as a former legislator and public official for almost a decade in the government of former left-wing president Rafael Correa. A three-term president whose presence looms large over the country’s polarised politics and who still claims a loyal following, Correa now lives in exile in Belgium to avoid arrest on charges of corruption, which he denies.
Noboa’s popularity had soared during the first months of his government to over 80 per cent after he responded to a series of violent events in January 2024 with a heavy-handed law enforcement approach (see below). But his ratings have since subsided, and now stand at a little over 50 per cent, in large part due to the persistence of insecurity despite his draconian measures. Violence has fallen slightly over the past year, but killings are climbing once again and reached a new high in January 2025, which was one of the most violent months in the country’s history.
Other setbacks have also contributed to his decline in opinion polls. The worst seasonal drought in six decades, exacerbated by climate change, growing demand for energy and years of poor maintenance, has played havoc with the country’s electricity supply, which depends on hydroelectric power; the resulting blackouts in late 2024 lasted as long as fourteen hours a day. Recent rainfall has raised reservoir levels, but the threat of renewed rationing persists. The energy crisis piled additional stress on Ecuador’s economy, which has been in a downturn since 2022 after recovering briefly from a deep recession during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the Central Bank of Ecuador, the economy contracted for three consecutive quarters in 2024.
Opinion pollsters, meanwhile, have pointed to a large number of undecided voters, meaning that a surprise candidate might qualify for the second round. The array of candidates includes businesspeople, former legislators, lawyers, activists, an Indigenous leader, a retired police chief, television broadcasters and former government officials, although only one candidate appears for now to have a good shot at reaching the second round in an upset. Andrea González, Villavicencio’s 2023 running mate, has gained support following a strong performance in the presidential debate in which she directly challenged Luisa González, presenting herself as a firm anti-Correista who can appeal to undecided voters.
Ecuador’s outbreak of lethal violence has been driven by a mix of external and domestic causes. As a neighbour of Colombia, whose border regions of Nariño and Putumayo are now home to some of the country’s largest and fastest-growing concentrations of coca crops, Ecuador has been particularly vulnerable to international shifts in cocaine supply. Mexican criminal organisations gained a firmer grip on cocaine trafficking routes after the 2016 Colombian peace agreement led to the demobilisation of the former Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), which had controlled coca cultivation and cocaine production sites across the country.
As the Mexicans opened new routes in a bid to bypass eradication and interdiction efforts in Colombia, Ecuador stood out as an appealing soft target. During the 2017-2021 presidency of Lenín Moreno, which took austerity measures mandated by the International Monetary Fund, the government cut prison spending by 30 per cent, eliminated the justice ministry and froze security budgets. These cuts weakened Ecuador’s security forces and border controls, as well as the government’s intelligence gathering and investigative capacity. The pull of Guayaquil, a major container port city with preferential trade access to Europe, helped realign cocaine trafficking routes toward the Pacific, spurring a surge in drug trafficking from Ecuador’s seaports and coastlines.
The shift in routes proved a lucrative opportunity for Ecuadorian gangs, coinciding with a moment when they had begun to fracture. An intense turf war broke out among local groups that were associated with various transnational criminal outfits, primarily Mexican drug cartels and Balkan mafias. The unsolved assassination of alias “Rasquiña”– the leader of Los Choneros – in late 2020 led to a steep escalation in violence as the once dominant gang split into smaller rival factions. “Rasquiña’s murder was the breaking point”, a former gang member in Durán, a poor and exceptionally violent municipality that is part of metropolitan Guayaquil, told Crisis Group. “That was when the battle of all against all began”. These groups have continued since then to engage in bloody clashes for control of drug trafficking routes and prisons.
Violence is at its most intense along the coast, where ports and river access routes to the Pacific are highly prized by criminal groups. In Guayaquil, for example, traffickers fight for dominion over crucial entry and exit routes to rivers and ports. The groups also seek to exert power over surrounding communities near river access points to the Gulf of Guayaquil, using them as storage hubs for their drug shipments. As criminal groups enter new illicit markets, notably illegal mining, and enlarge their geographical footprint, violence has also spread into previously untouched areas. This trend has become more conspicuous over the past year, above all in mining areas like Camilo Ponce Enríquez in Azuay province, in the southern highlands. Murders there soared in 2024, transforming it into the most violent district in the country, with a staggeringly high homicide rate of 259 per 100,000 people. Shootouts between criminal groups fighting over mines have become routine, accompanied by massive kidnappings of mine workers and frequent discoveries of burned, dismembered bodies. The mayor was killed after receiving death threats.
Meanwhile, smaller local gangs clash over control of communities where they run extortion and kidnapping rackets. In Guayaquil, extortion payments, locally known as vacunas, are a key source of financing for local crime groups, which cast a wide net to maximise returns. Gang members intimidate residents by alerting them via pamphlets, phone calls or text messages of an obligatory “security service”. Families, street vendors, small and medium-sized businesses, and even schools, churches and hospitals must all pay up or face consequences, from attacks on property to lethal violence. In some places, young women aged 16 to 18 are tasked with going house to house to collect payments from neighbours, as they draw less attention than men. A community leader told Crisis Group that extortion fees can range from $1 per week for households to $5 for street vendors, while payments from larger businesses are calculated on the basis of monthly profits. “The basic form of control is through extortion. It is the groups’ lifeblood”, a human rights activist said. “In terms of revenue, it competes with drug trafficking. But it dismantles the whole community organisation, the social base”.
In north-western Guayaquil, where communities like Flor de Bastión and Pascuales are under criminal control, some families have fled, abandoning their homes to local criminal groups to occupy or to store cocaine. These communities live under the shadow of constant threats, facing an acute risk that children could be forcibly recruited or decide themselves to join a gang out of economic necessity. Fearful of threats to their families, girls are sexually exploited by group members, who then pay off the families in money and protection, according to a Durán resident. Almost half the murders of children and adolescents aged 15 and under in Ecuador in 2024 took place in Guayas, the province encompassing Guayaquil and Durán.
The combination of oppressive levels of violence and high poverty has prompted a massive outflow of Ecuadorians seeking better lives. In 2024, more than 90,000 Ecuadorians travelled abroad and did not return. Many of them went to El Salvador, a popular way station for those seeking to reach the United States. After Venezuelans, Ecuadorians were the second-largest group crossing the perilous Darién Gap in 2023 – a jungle region between Colombia and Panama – as they risked their lives in search of refuge from extortion and violence.
Noboa’s response has been to impose a tough, military-led law enforcement approach. In November 2023, he became Ecuador’s youngest president at 35 after former President Guillermo Lasso, a conservative banker, called early elections to avoid facing impeachment on embezzlement allegations. That campaign was marred by criminal threats: Villavicencio’s murder was the first high-level political assassination in South America for over twenty years (other attempts in recent years have been unsuccessful). Noboa, who was elected to complete Lasso’s term, is a U.S.-born businessman and former legislator, as well as heir to a fortune underpinned by banana exports. His father ran and lost in five presidential races, three times to Correa.
Less than two months into his presidency, Noboa faced a defining moment in his rule when criminal groups, affronted by his decision to transfer a criminal leader to a high-security jail, sowed nationwide mayhem. Over two days in January 2024, they shot civilians, planted explosives in public spaces in different parts of the country, took over a hundred of prison guards hostage and raided a television station during a live news program in Guayaquil.
In response, the fledgling president declared the existence of an internal armed conflict, naming 22 criminal gangs as targets for military operations to be carried out according to the rules of war – among them Los Choneros, Los Lobos, Chone Killers and the Latin Kings. Declaring a 60-day national state of exception, Noboa deployed combined army and police units, allowed for searches of private homes without a warrant, and restricted movement and public gatherings. Subsequent declarations affected separate provinces, and restrictions remain in areas that are home to more than half the country’s population.
These measures were well received at first among a population desperate to see an end to the violence, and they were resoundingly approved in an April 2024 referendum. Security improved notably, with homicides decreasing by around 17 per cent in 2024 compared to the previous year, according to the interior ministry. Noboa appeared to be following the path set by El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, who has almost entirely curbed gang violence by imprisoning some 80,000 people under a state of exception, now in place for almost three years. Plans to build two maximum-security prisons closely match Bukele’s playbook. Noboa’s attendance at U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20 January inauguration also suggested that as a conservative leader in Latin America, he can expect to enjoy a good relationship with Washington, Ecuador’s key ally until now in fighting organised crime.
Yet Noboa’s achievements have also been tarnished. As noted above, the number of homicides is reaching new highs again. Attacks on politicians, police, local government officials, prison authorities and judges continue, along with brutal gang violence in communities. In prisons, crime and violence dropped sharply after the military took control and suspended prison visits for six months, restricted the use of mobile phones and drugs, and confiscated smuggled arms, ammunition and explosives. Human rights defenders and security experts are nevertheless concerned that some of the military officers working in prisons might be in cahoots with organised crime.
Noboa’s actions also have raised fears among activists, security experts and civil society organisations of human rights abuses and democratic backsliding. Non-governmental organisations have denounced cases of arbitrary detentions, forced disappearances, extrajudicial executions and other abuses over the past year, especially inside prisons now under military control. In December, the forced disappearance of four minors at the hands of the military in the south of Guayaquil shocked the country: the boys’ corpses were found a fortnight after they were reported missing, and prosecutors have charged sixteen military officers with their abduction and killing. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court has ruled several times since May against Noboa’s proclamation of an internal conflict as a way to lift constitutional guarantees and declare states of exception.
Noboa’s critics are alarmed by his disregard for the law. He refused to take a leave from the presidency five weeks before election day as required and appointed an acting vice president to handle executive functions a few days at a time, bypassing the elected vice president, Verónica Abad, with whom he has been feuding. Furthermore, Noboa earned Latin American opprobrium in April 2024 after he sent Ecuadorian police into the Mexican embassy to arrest an opposition politician, Jorge Glas, who had sought asylum there after being convicted of bribery and misuse of public funds. Mexico broke off diplomatic relations in response, but the move won popular support because many Ecuadorians saw it as a blow against corruption. The decision to target Glas, a close ally of Correa and his former vice president, also shattered the political pact between Correa’s Citizen Revolution party and the government, leaving the ruling party in a minority in the National Assembly and exposed to frequent, bitter attacks from other blocs.
Despite chequered results, most candidates – including those on the left – are embracing some version of mano dura and militarisation. They support reinforcing border controls; purging and restructuring security, justice and prison institutions; strengthening civilian security forces; and enhancing technology and intelligence to fight organised crime. Most plans are short on long-term strategy and offer no detail as to how to pay for the measures they propose. If Noboa is re-elected, he intends to continue his current military-led policies, maintaining the so-called Security Bloc, a military-police committee that has been in charge of operations since January 2024. The president has pointed to the success of his policies in terms of tonnes of drugs seized, weapons and ammunition confiscated, and arrests in troubled areas and along key roads; former security officials and experts argue that those numbers do not, by themselves, show a clear plan for restoring public safety. For his second term, Noboa has proposed strengthening cybersecurity and data protection policies, as well as creating community programs to deter juvenile delinquency.
González, the main opposition candidate, also proposes joint military and police units and raising military and police salaries in high-risk areas, which suggests that she would continue to give the military a prominent role in law enforcement, particularly in leading operations against organised crime. The approach is considerably more hardline than her experience in Correa’s government would suggest, although the former president’s policies shifted over time from an initial focus on encouraging gangs to desist from violence toward harsher penalties against drug traffickers. González also proposes to revamp community police units, create opportunities for young people and reduce poverty. She has called for the restoration of the justice and security coordination ministries, both eliminated under former President Moreno. When these ministries were shut down, security experts say, Ecuador was left without crucial capacity to fight organised crime. Other candidates, for their part, are embracing harsher positions, including legalising the death penalty for certain serious crimes and reinstating mandatory military service.
The importance of these elections will not be measured solely in the choice of the next president. Polls suggest that Correa’s Citizen Revolution and Noboa’s National Democratic Action lead in the congressional race, but neither is expected to achieve a majority, a result which would require the next president to negotiate alliances among various blocs to pass legislation. Meanwhile, Ecuador’s attorney general, Diana Salazar, will be ending her term in office in April having led some of the country’s most ground-breaking investigations, including a case known as “Metástasis”, which led in 2024 to the conviction of 32 people, including high-ranking officials, on charges of collusion with drug traffickers.
Whatever the outcome of the first round of voting, or the runoff in April, the pressure will be on the next government to make rapid progress in ensuring Ecuadorians feel safe again. Regaining territorial control, protecting citizens and ending criminal influence over prisons are essential first steps, and relying on military deployments is certainly popular. But unless these moves are followed up by other policies directed at strengthening the rule of law and meeting the needs of poor communities, they are unlikely to bring about sustainable improvements in security in the face of highly profitable organised crime and transnational drug trafficking. As a former intelligence officer told Crisis Group, the security crisis “cannot be solved in one government’s tenure” but requires “decades of far-reaching public policy, social policies and political commitments”. If anything is to be learned from the experiences of Mexico, Colombia and other countries that have endured persistent drug-related crime, it is that short-term progress can easily be reversed unless justice and security systems are bolstered, networks of corruption in the state are curbed and economic alternatives to crime reach the people who are most at risk.