Document #1304104
IRB – Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (Author)
In a 12 October 1998 facsimile sent to the
Research Directorate, the project coordinator of Accept, a
nongovernmental organization in Bucharest whose mission is to
"protect and to promote the human rights and fundamental freedoms
of gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transsexuals, educating and
informing the Romanian Society about homosexuality," states the
following:
What evidence is required in Romania in order to lay charges under article 200 (which authorizes penalties for gay or lesbian activists) of the Romanian penal code?
The evidence varies from the policeman's declaration that, for instance, the respective person was having sexual relations in public, to the neighbours' complaints that a person living close is gay or lesbian, or even complaints from ordinary people that they saw two men or two women kissing in the park. Anyway, according to the procedure, the prosecutor has to write a report (called in Romanian "rechizitoriu"). Juridical abuses happen due to the fact that the expression "public scandal", as it appears in the article 200, is not explained anywhere in the penal code....
What evidence is required in order to convict gays or lesbians under article 200 of the Romanian penal code?
The judge is going to analyze the above mentioned declarations and/or complaints. Usually, this evidence is enough for conviction, at least as far as gays or lesbians are concerned. The judge may ask for further evidence or not from the prosecutor. It depends on the judge.
Are court transcripts of decisions to acquit, or convict, gays or lesbians (under article 200 of the Romanian penal code) and the accompanying justification for acquittal or conviction available to the public?
No. The court transcriptions of these decisions are only available, upon request, to the people convicted.
This information represents my viewpoint.
This Response was prepared after
researching publicly accessible information currently available to
the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is
not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any
particular claim to refugee status or asylum.
Reference
Accept: The Bucharest Acceptance Group,
Bucharest. 12 October 1998. Facsimile sent to the Research
Directorate by the project coordinator.