Document #1154511
IRB – Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (Author)
According to one source, talks which took
place between President Jayewardene and the Tamil United Liberation
Front (TULF) in 1981 as part of a government peace strategy in
anticipation of a visit by Queen Elizabeth, put forward a demand
for the creation of "home guards". [ Satchi Ponnambalam, Sri
Lanka: The National Question and the Tamil Liberation Struggle,
(London: Zed Books, 1983), pp. 211-212. ] In December 1984 the
government decided to send ca.200,000 people, mostly Sinhalese,
from the South into the Tamil areas, supplying "home guards" within
this group with shotguns and automatic weapons for self-defence. [
Brian Senewiratne, Violations of Human Rights in Sri Lanka,
Queensland, Australia, ca. 1986, pp. 15-16.] These armed groups
have been held responsible for serious violations of Tamils' rights
in their areas of influence and are reportedly beyond the control
of the police and law-enforcing bodies in Sri Lanka. [
Ibid.]
Asia Watch describes the Home Guards as "an
armed auxiliary force of non-Tamil civilians established by a
directive of the President and functioning under the responsibility
of the Ministry of Internal Security", criticized by the press and
human rights organizations as poorly trained and undisciplined. [
Cycles of Violence, (Washington, D.C.: Asia Watch, December
1987), p. 23.] The Home Guards, which reportedly operate
independently, but in some cases in conjunction with other armed
forces' personnel, are reported to be implicated in cases of
extra-judicial executions, massacres, arrests and rape. [
Ibid, pp. 23, 33-34.]
According to official statements made by
the Sri Lanka government after the Indian Peace-Keeping Force
(IPKF) arrived to the Northern and Eastern provinces, 10,000 Home
Guards -over 90 percent of their total in these provinces- had
returned their weapons to the police by the end of August 1987. [
Ibid, p. 43.] Although the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
claimed on 28 August 1987 that the Home Guards had not been
disarmed, Asia Watch reports that evidence tends to support the
claim that Home Guards had been disarmed. [ Ibid.]
In September 1987, the government
reportedly announced plans to recruit up to 30,000 men into
militias or Home Guards in the South, to deal with the Janata
Vimukhti Peramuna (JVP) guerrillas, although the proposal met
opposition from political parties and human rights activists who
feared the Home Guards may turn into private or partisan armies. [
Ibid, p. 70.]
According to Human Rights Watch, as
communicated by telephone on 14 May 1990, the Home Guards have been
re-deployed to the Southern regions to fight the JVP, and to this
date there is no sign of their disbanding. Rather, the possibility
of assimilating them to the army or police forces is being
discussed as an alternative. The source added that participation in
the Home Guards is voluntary, with no reports having been received
concerning forced training or recruitment in the regions where they
now operate. The Sri Lankan government, however, has apparently
provided weapons to civilian politicians, many of which have
reportedly formed small "private armies" or armed groups of
bodyguards.
Additional corroborating information on the
above could not be found among the sources currently available to
the IRBDC.