Report of States Parties submitted under Article 9 of the Convention; Third periodic reports of States parties due in 2003; Addendum; Kazakhstan [CERD/C/439/Add.2]
|
Distr.
GENERAL
CERD/C/65/CO/3 10 December 2004
Original: ENGLISH |
Concluding observations of the
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination : Kazakhstan.
10/12/2004.
CERD/C/65/CO/3.
(Concluding
Observations/Comments) |
Convention Abbreviation: CERD
COMMITTEE ON THE
ELIMINATION
OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
Sixty-fifth session
2-20 August
2004
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES
UNDER ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION
Concluding observations of the Committee on
the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination
KAZAKHSTAN
1. The Committee considered the
initial to third periodic reports of Kazakhstan, which were due on 25 September
1999, 2001 and 2003, respectively, submitted as one document (CERD/C/439/Add.2),
at its 1662nd and 1663rd meetings (CERD/C/SR.1662 and 1663), held on 13 and 16
August 2004. At its 1670th meeting (CERD/C/SR.1670), held on 19 August 2004, it
adopted the following concluding observations.
A.
Introduction2. The Committee welcomes the initial report submitted
by the State party and the additional information provided by the delegation.
The Committee also appreciates the presence of a high-ranking delegation
representing the State organs responsible for the elimination of racial
discrimination and the opportunity thus afforded to enter into a dialogue with
the State party in a constructive manner.
3. Noting that the initial
report was submitted five years after the ratification of the Convention, the
Committee invites the State party to take due account, in the submission of its
future reports, of the timetable provided for by the Committee.
B.
Positive aspects4. The Committee notes that the State party is a
multi-ethnic country, with numerous very different and significant communities
representing more than 40 per cent of the total population, and appreciates the
efforts made by the State party to provide information relating to the ethnic
composition of the population as well as other statistical data.
5. The
Committee appreciates the efforts of the State party to establish and improve
human rights organs.
6. The Committee notes with satisfaction the
information provided on the economic improvement of the country, especially the
reduction of unemployment.
7. The Committee also notes with satisfaction
that the State party has ratified the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of
Refugees and its 1967 Protocol as well as the Discrimination (Employment and
Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111) of ILO.
C. Concerns and
recommendations8. The Committee notes that there is no specific
legislation in the State party regarding racial discrimination.
The Committee is of the view that specific domestic law regarding
racial discrimination, implementing the provisions of the Convention, as
well as a legal definition of racial discrimination that complies with the
provisions of the Convention, would be a useful tool to combat racial
discrimination in the State party.9. While taking note of
the constitutional and other provisions prohibiting propaganda regarding racial
or ethnic superiority, the Committee is concerned about the insufficiency of
specific penal provisions concerning article 4 (a) of the Convention in the
domestic legislation of the State party.
The Committee recommends that the State party adopt legislation, in
the light of the Committee's general recommendation XV, to ensure full and
adequate implementation of article 4 (a) of the Convention.10.
While acknowledging that since independence the State party has opened its
borders, the Committee also notes that there is a high level of emigration
amongst particular ethnic or national groups.
The Committee recommends that the State party include information in
its next periodic report on emigration, including information on the causes
and consequences of this ongoing phenomenon and its impact on particular
ethnic or national groups.11. While welcoming the information
provided on several minorities in the State party, the Committee regrets the
lack of information on the situation of certain minority groups, in particular
the Roma, and their enjoyment of all human rights.
The Committee recommends that the State party include information in
its next periodic report on the situation of all minority groups, in
particular the Roma, and in this connection draws the attention of the State
party to its general recommendation XXVII on discrimination against
Roma.12. The Committee notes the absence of legislation
regarding the status of languages and that little information has been provided
by the State party on the participation of minorities in the elaboration of
cultural and educational policies. The Committee is concerned that minority
languages are not used in the educational system to an extent commensurate to
the proportion of the different ethnic communities represented in the student
body.
The Committee recommends that the State party adopt legislation on
the status of languages and that it include detailed information in its next
periodic report regarding the use of ethnic minority languages in education
and how ethnic minorities participate in the elaboration of cultural and
educational policies.13. The Committee notes that the ethnic
representation in State institutions does not correspond to the proportion of
the different ethnic communities represented in the population of the State
party.
The Committee recommends that the State party include information in
its next periodic report regarding the ethnic representation in State
institutions and adopt practical measures to ensure that ethnic minorities
have equal access to those institutions.14. The Committee
regrets the lack of information in the State party's report on the fundamental
rights of non-citizens temporarily or permanently settled in Kazakhstan,
including migrant workers.
Drawing the attention of the State party to its general
recommendation XXX on discrimination against non-citizens, the Committee
recommends that the State party include information in its next periodic
report on non-citizens and on the enjoyment of their rights. Furthermore, it
encourages the State party to consider ratifying the International
Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and
Members of Their Families.15. The Committee is concerned that
some refugees have been forcibly returned to their countries when there were
substantial grounds for believing that they might suffer serious human rights
violations.
The Committee recommends to the State party that it include in its
next periodic report information on the situation of refugees, the legal
basis for their deportation, and the legal protection provided, including
their rights to legal assistance and judicial appeal against deportation
orders. It also urges the State party to ensure, in accordance with article
5 (b) of the Convention, that no refugees will be forcibly returned to a
country where there are substantial grounds for believing that they may
suffer serious human rights violations.16. While acknowledging
that the State party has developed a governmental work plan to combat human
trafficking, the Committee notes with concern that there is ongoing trafficking
of women and children, particularly affecting non-citizens and ethnic
minorities.
The Committee recommends that the State party include detailed
information in its next periodic report on human trafficking and that it
reinforce its ongoing efforts to prevent and combat trafficking and provide
support and assistance to victims. Furthermore, the Committee urges the
State party to make determined efforts to prosecute the perpetrators and
underlines the paramount importance of prompt and impartial investigations.
17. While acknowledging the efforts made by the State party to
confront the scourge of terrorism with a national counter-terrorism programme,
the Committee is concerned about the lack of information on the impact of this
programme on the principle of non-discrimination.
The Committee draws the State party's attention to its statement of 8
March 2002 in which it stressed the obligation of States to ensure that
measures taken in the struggle against terrorism did not discriminate in
purpose or effect on grounds of race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic
origin and requests the State party to include in its next periodic report
further information on its counter-terrorism programme.18. The
Committee notes with concern that, with the exception of the judges of the
Supreme Court, all the judges are appointed by the President, who also
determines the organization of the work of the courts.
The Committee recommends that the State party strengthen the
independence of the judiciary and other State organs in order to provide
everyone with effective protection and remedies against any acts of
violation of the Convention and that it include detailed information in its
next periodic report on the measures taken to that end.19. The
Committee notes the absence of court cases regarding racial discrimination in
the State party and that only two complaints of racial discrimination were
brought before the Commission on Human Rights in 2000 and 2001.
The Committee recommends that the State party ensure that the paucity
of complaints is not the result of victims' lack of awareness of their
rights or limited financial means, or their lack of confidence in the police
and the judicial authorities, or to the authorities' lack of attention or
sensitivity to cases of racial discrimination. The Committee urges the State
party to ensure that appropriate provisions are available in the national
legislation regarding effective protection and remedies against violation of
the Convention and to disseminate as widely as possible among the public
information on the legal remedies available.20. While noting
the existence of the Commission on Human Rights, which has a primarily
consultative function, as well as the recent nomination of an Ombudsman, the
Committee regrets the insufficiency of detailed information regarding their
independence and effectiveness.
The Committee recommends that in its next periodic report the State
party provide additional information on the role and functioning of the
Commission on Human Rights and the Ombudsman. Furthermore, the Committee
encourages the State party to consider establishing an independent national
human rights institution, in accordance with the Principles relating to the
status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human
rights (the Paris Principles) (General Assembly resolution
48/134).21. The Committee notes the insufficient information
on efforts undertaken by the State party to involve non-governmental
organizations in the preparation of the periodic report and expresses concern
over the restrictions placed by the authorities on civil society organizations,
including organizations working to combat racial discrimination.
The Committee underlines the importance of the role of civil society
in the full implementation of the Convention and recommends that the State
party remove all legal, practical and administrative obstacles to the free
functioning of civil society organizations that contribute to promoting
human rights and combating racial discrimination. Furthermore, the Committee
recommends that they be consulted during the preparation of the next
periodic report.22. The Committee recommends that the State
party take into account the relevant parts of the Durban Declaration and
Programme of Action when implementing the Convention in the domestic legal
order, in particular in respect of articles 2 to 7 of the Convention. It further
recommends that it include in its next periodic report information on measures
taken to implement the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action at the
national level.
23. The Committee also recommends that the State party's
reports be made readily available to the public from the time they are submitted
and that the observations of the Committee on these reports be similarly
publicized.
24. The Committee notes that the State party has not made the
optional declaration provided for in article 14 of the Convention and recommends
that it consider so doing.
25. The Committee strongly recommends that the
State party ratify the amendments to article 8, paragraph 6, of the Convention,
adopted on 15 January 1992 at the Fourteenth Meeting of States Parties to the
Convention and endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 47/111. In
this connection, the Committee refers to General Assembly resolution 57/194, in
which the Assembly strongly urged States parties to accelerate their domestic
ratification procedures with regard to the amendment and to notify the
Secretary-General expeditiously in writing of their agreement to the amendment.
A similar appeal was reiterated by the Assembly in resolution 58/160.
26.
The Committee recommends that the State party submit its fourth periodic report
jointly with its fifth periodic report on 25 September 2007, and that it address
in that report all points raised in the present concluding observations.
-----
1996-2001
Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Geneva, Switzerland
Associated documents