EN | DE
LOGIN
loading...

TURKEY

Human Rights Issues

  Overview
Death penalty
  Torture/ Ill-treatment
Arbitrary detention
  Fair trial
Prison conditions
  Demonstrations
Ethnic affiliation
  Religious affiliation Political affiliation
  NGOs and Human rights defenders
Women
  Children/ Youth
Challenged and sick persons
  Sexual orientation
Freedom of opinion and media
  Military service/ Desertion
Refugees
 

19.09.2008 - Source: US Department of State

Annual report on religious freedom 2008 ("International Religious Freedom Report 2008") [ID 24802]

"The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, and other laws and policies contributed to the generally free practice of religion, but constitutional provisions regarding the integrity and existence of the secular state restrict these rights.

The Government generally respected religious freedom in practice; however, the Government imposes limitations on Islamic and other religious groups and significant restrictions on Islamic religious expression in government offices and state-run institutions, including universities, for the stated reason of preserving the "secular state." There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the Government during the period covered by this report. In February 2008 the Parliament passed constitutional amendments designed to lift the ban against wearing headscarves on university campuses. However, on June 5, 2008, the Constitutional Court ruled that amendments intended to permit the wearing of headscarves in universities violated the secular nature of the state and were therefore unconstitutional. Authorities continued their broad ban on wearing Islamic religious headscarves in government offices as well as public schools. The Government continued to oppose "Islamic extremism." Religious minorities said they were effectively blocked from careers in state institutions because of their faith. Minority religious groups also faced difficulties in worshipping, registering with the Government, and training their followers. Although religious speech and persuasion is legal, some Muslims, Christians, and Baha'is faced a few restrictions and occasional harassment for alleged proselytizing or holding unauthorized meetings.

There were reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. Violent attacks and continued threats against non-Muslims during the reporting period created an atmosphere of pressure and diminished freedom for some non-Muslim communities. Many Christians, Baha'is, and Muslims faced societal suspicion and mistrust, and more-radical Islamist elements continued to express anti-Semitic sentiments. Additionally, persons wishing to convert from Islam sometimes experienced social harassment and violence from relatives and neighbors.

Section I. Religious Demography

The country has an area of 301,383 square miles and a population of 70.5 million. According to the Government, 99 percent of the population is Muslim, the majority of which is Hanafi Sunni. According to the human rights nongovernmental organization (NGO) Mazlum-Der and representatives of various religious minority communities, the actual percentage of Muslims is slightly lower. Following the 1923 Lausanne Treaty, the Government officially recognizes only three minority religious communities. These are Greek Orthodox Christians, Armenian Orthodox Christians, and Jews, although other non-Muslim communities exist. The level of religious observance varied throughout the country, in part due to the influence of secular traditions and official restrictions on religious expression in political and social life.

In addition to the Sunni Muslim majority, academics estimate that there are between 10 million and 20 million Alevis, followers of a belief system that incorporates aspects of both Shi'a and Sunni Islam and draws on the traditions of other religious groups indigenous to Anatolia as well. Some Alevis practice rituals that include men and women worshipping together through oratory, poetry, and dance. The Government considers Alevism a heterodox Muslim sect; some Alevis and Sunnis maintain that Alevis are not Muslims.

There are several other religious groups, mostly concentrated in Istanbul and other large cities. While exact membership figures are not available, these religious groups include approximately 65,000 Armenian Orthodox Christians, 23,000 Jews, and up to 4,000 Greek Orthodox Christians. The Government interpreted the 1923 Lausanne Treaty as granting special legal minority status exclusively to these three recognized groups, although the treaty text refers broadly to "non-Muslim minorities" without listing specific groups. This recognition does not extend to the religious leadership organs. For example, the Ecumenical (Greek Orthodox) and Armenian Patriarchates continued to seek legal recognition of their status as patriarchates rather than foundations, the absence of which prevents them from having the right to own and transfer property and train religious clergy. Additionally, because the Government requires all places of learning to be under the control of the Ministry of Education, the Greek Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, and Jews choose not to train their ministry in the country. The Bulgarian Orthodox Church, through a 1945 bilateral agreement, is considered under the ecclesiastical authority of the Greek Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarchate in Istanbul (and Greece), but the Bulgarian Orthodox Church has its own foundation.

There also are approximately 500,000 Shiite Caferis; 10,000 Baha'is; 15,000 Syrian Orthodox (Syriac) Christians; 5,000 Yezidis; 3,300 Jehovah's Witnesses; 3,000 Protestants; and small, undetermined numbers of Bulgarian, Chaldean, Nestorian, Georgian, Roman Catholic, and Maronite Christians. Among these minority religious communities are a significant number of Iraqi refugees, including 3,000 Chaldean Christians. The number of Syriac Christians in the southeast was once higher; however, under pressure from government authorities and later under the impact of the war against the terrorist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), many Syriacs migrated to Istanbul, Western Europe, or North and South America. Over the last several years, small numbers of Syriacs returned from overseas to the southeast, mostly from Western Europe. In most cases, older family members returned while younger ones remained abroad.
"

Document(s): Open document

05.2008 - Source: US Commission on International Religious Freedom

Annual report on religious freedom 2008 (see p. 299) ("Annual Report of the United States Commission in International Religious Freedom") [ID 23420]

Document(s): Open document

13.03.2008 - Source: Forum 18

New law does not allow Muslim or non-Muslim religious communities to legally exist as themselves; religious communities are not allowed to own their own places of worship ("What difference does the latest Foundations Law make?") [ID 22686]

Document(s): Open document

11.03.2008 - Source: US Department of State

Religion courses ("Country Report on Human Rights Practices 2007") [ID 22918]

"The constitution establishes compulsory religious and moral instruction in primary and secondary schools. Religious minorities are exempted. However, a few religious minorities, such as Protestants, faced difficulty obtaining exemptions, particularly if their identification cards did not list a religion other than Islam. The government claimed that the religion courses covered the range of world religions; however, religious minorities asserted the courses reflected Sunni Islamic doctrine, which they maintained explains why non-Muslims are exempt.

[...]

Only the Diyanet is authorized to provide religion courses outside of school, although clandestine private courses existed. Students who complete five years of primary school may enroll in Diyanet Koran classes on weekends and during summer vacation. Many Koran courses functioned unofficially. Only children 12 and older may legally register for official Koran courses, and Mazlum-Der reported that law enforcement authorities often raided illegal courses for younger children. According to Diyanet figures, there were nearly 5,000 official Koran courses throughout the country."

Document(s): Open document

06.11.2007 - Source: European Commission

Freedom of religion ("Turkey 2007 Progress Report [SEC(2007) 1436]") [ID 22371]

"[...] On 19 June, the Ministry of Interior issued a Circular on freedom of religion of non-Muslim Turkish citizens. The Circular acknowledges that there has been an increase in individual crimes against non-Muslim citizens and their places of worship. It requests the governors of all provinces to take the necessary measures to prevent such incidents from happening again and to enhance tolerance towards individuals with different religion and beliefs. The impact of this Circular will need to be assessed in practice.

The regulation implementing the Law on Demographic Services entered into force in November 2006. It provides that information requested on religion in the family registries will be entered, amended or deleted only on the basis of a written statement by citizens.

However, administrative documents such as ID cards include an entry on religion that may be filled in or left blank. This might lead to discriminatory practices. In addition, there are still concerns regarding religions which are not recognised.
[...]
Non-Muslim religious communities - as organised structures of religious groups - continue to face problems such as lack of legal personality and restricted property rights. These communities have also encountered problems with the management of their foundations and with recovering property by judicial means.

Local authorities differ from province to province on issuing construction permits for places of worship. This might lead to arbitrary implementation of the zoning law. Several churches have not been able to register their places of worship.
[...]
Overall, the environment as regards freedom of religion has not been conducive to the full respect of this right in practice. A legal framework has yet to be established in line with the ECHR so that all religious communities can function without undue constraints. No real progress can be reported on the major difficulties encountered by the Alevis and non-Muslim religious communities.

 "

Document(s): Open document

14.09.2007 - Source: US Department of State

International Religious Freedom Report 2007 ("International Religious Freedom Report 2007") [ID 22675]

Document(s): Open document

22.01.2007 - Source: Forum 18

Discussion of possible adoption of controversial Foundations Law; ECHR ruling in favour of Greek Orthodox community ("Religious freedom via Strasbourg, not Ankara or Brussels?") [ID 19677]

Document(s): Open document

22.11.2006 - Source: Forum 18

Discussion of Foundations Law; several Protestant churches gain association status; little overall progress in religious freedom in 2006; minorities such as the Syrian Orthodox do not have legal right to undertake activities essential for a functioning peaceful religious community ("Pope Benedict XVI's visit and religious freedom") [ID 18397]

Document(s): Open document

08.11.2006 - Source: Christian Solidarity Worldwide

Izmir: Odemis Protestant Church attacked with 6 Molotov Cocktails; 2 men working for a Bible correspondence course accused of inciting hatred against Islam ("CSW raises fresh concerns over religious freedom in Turkey as EU Commission releases progress report") [ID 18402]

Document(s): Open document

08.11.2006 - Source: European Commission

Freedom of religion (non-Muslim religious communities have no access to legal personality; restrictions on the training of clergy; no developments in relation to the situation of Alevi community) ("Turkey 2006 Progress Report") [ID 19392]

"As concerns freedom of religion, freedom of worship continues to be generally respected.

In April a delegation consisting of the Ministries of Interior, Education, Foreign Affairs, the EUSG and Istanbul governorate visited leaders of non-Muslim communities in Istanbul to discuss their problems and possible solutions.

Although the mandatory indication of religious affiliation in some personal documents, such as ID-cards, was abolished in April 2006, such documents still include information on religion, leaving open the potential for discriminatory practices. This is an area of concern.

Furthermore, a number of other problems remain. Non-Muslim religious communities have no access to legal personality and continued to face restricted property rights. They encountered problems in the management of their foundations and in recovering property by judicial means, The June 2005 ruling by the Council of State narrowing the scope for the Directorate General for Foundations to take over the management of foundations was not applied during the reporting period. In this respect, no progress can be reported on the Büyükada Greek Girls’ and Boys’ Orphanage, whose management remains under the control of the DG foundations.

The impact of the new law on foundations on the issues above will have to be assessed once it has been adopted.

Furthermore, restrictions on the training of clergy and on foreign clergy to work in Turkey remain. Turkish legislation does not provide for private higher religious education for these communities. The Greek Orthodox Halki (Heybeliada) seminary remains closed. The public use of the ecclesiastical title of Ecumenical Patriarch is still banned.

Sermons and publications of the Religious Affairs Directorate (Diyanet) and of local religious authorities occasionally appear hostile towards proselytising activities. Attacks against clergy and places of worship of non-Muslim religious Communities have been reported. The court case concerning the murder of the Catholic Priest Andrea Santoro in a church in the Black Sea region province of Trabzon in February 2006 resulted in a heavy penalty for the perpetrator. Several incidents against Syriacs also occurred.

There have been no developments in relation to the situation of the Alevi community. Alevis face difficulties for opening their places of worship (Cem houses). Cem houses are not recognised as places of worship and receive no funding from the authorities.

Alevi children are subject to compulsory religious instruction in schools, which fails to acknowledge their specificity. A case on compulsory religious education is pending before the ECtHR. References to Alevis are planned to be introduced in the secondary school curricula as from next year.

Overall, freedom of worship continues to be generally respected. However, no progress can be reported with regard to difficulties encountered by non-Muslim religious communities on the ground. Furthermore, the Alevis continue to face discriminatory practices."

Document(s): Open document

10.10.2006 - Source: International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights

Law on Foundations ("A Minority Policy of Systematic Negation") [ID 18407]

"In Turkey, all religious institutions are subject to the formal Law on Foundations. Under this Foundations system, the law designates the Directorate General for Foundations (Vakiflar Genel Mudurdlugu) as responsible for the 160 recognized non-Muslim “community foundations” of which about half are Greek Orthodox foundations and the rest Armenian Orthodox and Jewish, and their churches, monasteries, synagogues, and related religious property, while the overseeing of the 75,000 mosque “foundations” is the shared responsibility of the Directorate General for Foundations and the Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet), a governmental body which oversees Muslim religious facilities.

The Law on Foundations reserves differential treatment to the non-Muslim “community foundations” and to the Muslim “foundations” and therefore amounts to a serious challenge to freedom of religion and religious tolerance in Turkey. Under this foundation system, non-Muslim minorities face restricted property rights and interference in the management of their foundations as well as a ban on training their own clergy while non-Sunni Muslim communities experience difficulties inter alia in terms of recognizing places of worship and with participation in compulsory religious education in schools.

At this writing, a new Law on Foundations is pending in Turkish parliament [...]."

Document(s): Report
Press Release

10.10.2006 - Source: International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights

Minority Assessment Board and the Directorate General for Foundations ("A Minority Policy of Systematic Negation") [ID 18408]

"In January 2004, the Secondary Committee for Minorities established by a secret decree in 1962 in order to carry out security surveillance of minorities was abolished and replaced with the Minority Assessment Board responsible for the problems of non-Muslim minorities. The Directorate General for Foundations is the most decisive body on the Minority Assessment Board. Yet, whereas it has succeeded in incorporating the issue of minority religious groups’ rights in recent series of legislative reforms, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) has noted that the directorate is said to be “unduly restrictive in the way it implements the legislative changes, rendering them virtually useless.”"

Document(s): Report
Press Release

10.10.2006 - Source: International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights

Violence against Christians ("A Minority Policy of Systematic Negation") [ID 18445]

"There have also been instances of violence that reflect anti-Christian motives.

[...] For instance, in early 2006, the Armenian Church of St. Gregor was fired at by non-identified individuals shouting anti-Christian slogans. Similarly, by mid-2006, there have already been four attacks on Catholic priests and two on Protestant church leaders, with two resulting in deaths. In one case, the perpetrator had been known to divulgate to the press false and ominous information about the priest and his church in an attempt to feed anti-Christian mentality in Turkey."

Document(s): Report
Press Release

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Constitution and religious freedom ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17988]

"Die türkische Verfassung garantiert die Religions- und Gewissensfreiheit. Die individuelle Glaubensfreiheit wird respektiert und die Religionsausübung ist weitgehend frei möglich. Das neue türkische Strafgesetzbuch (in Kraft seit 1. Juni 2005) stellt in Artikel 115 die Behinderung der Religionsfreiheit und in Artikel 216 die Erniedrigung religiöser Werte unter Strafe. Allerdings unter- liegen religiöse Gemeinschaften außerhalb des sunnitischen Islam, also auch islamische Gruppierungen, rechtlichen und administrativen Einschränkungen bei ihren Gruppenrechten, wie auch der letzte Fortschrittsbericht Türkei der EU-Kommission vom 9. November 2005 festgestellt hat."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Change of religion ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17989]

"Ein offizieller Religions- oder Konfessionswechsel ist möglich. Im Zuge der EU-Harmonisierungsgesetze ist das Verfahren zur Änderung oder Streichung des Religionseintrags in amtlichen Ausweispapieren vereinfacht worden. Es ist dafür eine persönliche Erklärung der betreffenden Person erforderlich.

In der Türkei besteht kein gesetzliches Verbot, religiöse Schriften zu verbreiten oder missionierend tätig zu sein. Gemäß Artikel 115 des neuen Strafgesetzbuches macht sich vielmehr derjenige strafbar, der die Verbreitung von religiösen Gedanken und Überzeugungen verhindert. Nach Informationen der Bundes- regierung schreiten die Behörden an manchen Orten bei missionarischen Akti- vitäten im öffentlichen Raum mitunter ein und unterbinden den Verkauf oder die Verteilung von Bibeln. Berichten zufolge geschieht dies häufig nach Aufforde- rung durch Anwohner oder Passanten. In Ankara sendet eine christliche Radio- station täglich Bibellosungen und informiert, an welche Stellen man sich bei Interesse am christlichen Glauben wenden kann."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Non-discrimination on grounds of religious affiliation by law; de facto governmental discrimination of religious minorities ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17990]

"In Artikel 10 der türkischen Verfassung ist das Prinzip der Gleichheit der Bürger vor dem Gesetz unabhängig von Religion oder Bekenntnis verankert. Der Bun- desregierung sind keine Gesetze oder Verwaltungsverordnungen bekannt, die Angehörigen nicht muslimischer Minderheiten in der Türkei den Zugang zu öffentlichen Ämtern verwehren. Ein Gesetz von 1950, das die Beschäftigung von Angehörigen nicht muslimischer Minderheiten im Staatsdienst verboten hat, ist inzwischen aufgehoben. In ihrem letzten Fortschrittsbericht vom 9. No- vember 2005 verweist die EU-Kommission aber darauf, dass die Türkei das Pro- tokoll Nr. 12 zur EMRK über das allgemeine Verbot der Diskriminierung durch öffentliche Behörden noch nicht ratifiziert habe. Dies sei besonders deswegen von Bedeutung, weil [religiöse] Minderheiten de facto oft diskriminiert würden und ihnen der Zugang zu Stellen in der Verwaltung oder im Militär erschwert werde."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Societal discrimination of religious minorities ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17991]

"Religiös motivierte Übergriffe auf Angehörige von Minderheiten kommen nur vereinzelt vor. In ihrem letzten Fortschrittsbericht vom 9. November 2005 berichtet die EU-Kommission von „Übergriffen oder Einschüchterungsversuchen gegen einige nicht muslimische Gemeinschaften, insbesondere von Seiten extremistischer Gruppierungen“. 2006 kam es zu zwei Anschlägen gegen katholische Priester in der Türkei. Einer der Priester wurde dabei getötet. Die türkische Regierung hat die Tat scharf verurteilt. Die zuständigen türkischen Behörden führen amtliche Ermittlungen über diesen Vorfall und dessen Umstände durch. Ein Gerichtsverfahren gegen einen Tatverdächtigen wurde eingeleitet."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Rights of religious minorities compared to those of the Sunni community ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17992]

"Wie in der Antwort zu Frage 3 beschrieben, ist in Artikel 10 der türkischen Verfassung das Prinzip der Gleichheit der Bürger vor dem Gesetz unabhängig von Religion oder Bekenntnis verankert. Der Lausanner Vertrag von 1923 garantiert den nicht muslimischen Minderheiten in der Türkei in Artikel 37 ff. das Prinzip der Nichtdiskriminierung. In der Praxis werden darunter von türkischer Seite drei Religionsgemeinschaften verstanden, nämlich die griechisch-orthodoxe und armenisch-apostolische Kirche und die jüdische Gemeinschaft. Den anderen Minderheiten werden die Privilegien der so genannten „Lausanner Minderheiten“, Schulen und religiöse Stiftungen zu unterhalten, bislang versagt. Die Wahrnehmung von Gruppenrechten anderer Religionen als der des sunnitischen Islam unterliegt rechtlichen und administrativen Einschränkungen, die nur sehr zögerlich im Zuge des EU-Beitrittsprozesses abgebaut werden. Nicht sunnitische Glaubensgemeinschaften erhalten ferner keine finanzielle Unterstützung von türkischer staatlicher Seite.

Im Zuge der Reformpolitik der türkischen Regierung wurden im August 2002 und im Januar 2003 die Besitzrechte der nicht muslimischen Minderheiten gestärkt, die über religiöse Stiftungen verfügen. Ein Gesetzentwurf zur Neuregelung des Stiftungsrechts ist im Parlament anhängig. Der türkische Außenminister Gül kündigte am 12. April 2006 ein 9. Reformpaket an, das auch die Verabschiedung des Stiftungsgesetzes in Aussicht stellt."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Legal status of religious minorities ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17993]

"Mit Gründung der türkischen Republik wurde die Rechtspersönlichkeit sowohl der muslimischen als auch der nicht muslimischen Gemeinden abgeschafft.

Gemeinden können sich nach türkischem Recht sowohl als Stiftung (Vakif), die der Aufsicht der türkischen Generaldirektion für Stiftungen (VGM) unterliegt, als auch als Verein (Dernek) organisieren. So wurde am 5. März 2004 die deutschsprachige Gemeinde St. Nikolas in Antalya als Verein registriert. Als Rechtspersönlichkeit existieren allerdings nur der Verein bzw. die Stiftung, nicht aber die Kirchen selbst. Dies gilt prinzipiell auch für die muslimischen Gemeinden, die grundsätzlich unter die Hoheit des Präsidiums für religiöse Angelegenheiten (Diyanet) fallen, das seinerseits u. a. die Unterhaltung von Moscheen sowie die Ausbildung und Beschäftigung von Geistlichen regelt.

Die Novellierung des Vereinsgesetzes vom 23. November 2004 erweiterte die Möglichkeit, Vereine zu gründen. Zuvor war es ausdrücklich untersagt, Vereinigungen auf der Grundlage der Zugehörigkeit zu einer Volksgruppe, Religion oder Region zu gründen. Diese Beschränkungen wurden aufgehoben. Ungeachtet dieser Verbesserungen ist religiösen Gemeinschaften nach wie vor ein Status mit Rechtspersönlichkeit verwehrt. Im EU-Fortschrittsbericht vom 9. November 2005 heißt es: „Derzeit wird im türkischen Parlament über ein Gesetz für Stiftungen beraten. Dieses Gesetz würde zwar eine Verbesserung für die nicht muslimischen Gemeinschaften bedeuten, die über Stiftungen verfügen, doch bleibt es in seiner vorliegenden Form hinter den europäischen Normen zurück.“"

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Property rights and the right on the establishment of chapels of religious minorities ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17994]

"Die Durchführungsbestimmungen von 1935 und 1936 des Stiftungsgesetzes von 1926 führten eine Registrierung der vorhandenen Immobilien von muslimischen und nicht muslimischen Stiftungen ein. Aufgrund eines umstrittenen Urteils des Kassationshofes (Yargitay) von 1974 wurden diejenigen Immobilien konfisziert, die seinerzeit nicht registriert worden waren und welche die Stiftungen zwischenzeitlich durch Schenkungen, Kauf und Vermächtnis erworben hatten.

Im August 2002 und Januar 2003 hat die türkische Regierung Reformen im Stiftungsrecht eingeführt, die es Stiftungen von religiösen Gemeinschaften ermöglicht, bereits erworbene oder genutzte Immobilien auf Antrag innerhalb von 6 Monaten (später auf 18 Monate verlängert) nach Inkrafttreten des Gesetzes registrieren zu lassen und in der Zukunft Immobilien zu erwerben, zu veräußern und zu erben, um karitative und religiöse Aufgaben zu erfüllen. Auch die Bestimmungen zur Errichtung von Gebetsstätten wurden liberalisiert.

Die Art und Weise, wie die für Stiftungen zuständige Generaldirektion VGM mit dem Problem in Bezug auf die Vermögensrechte umgeht, ist jedoch weiterhin unbefriedigend. Dies stellt der Fortschrittsbericht der EU-Kommission vom 9. November 2005 eindeutig fest und regt an, zur Überwindung dieser Defizite weitere geeignete Rechtsvorschriften zu erlassen.

Im Juni 2005 wurde die protestantische Kirche in Diyarbakir als offizielle Gebetsstätte anerkannt, nachdem im März 2005 bereits eine protestantische Kirche in Ankara als Vereinigung eingetragen wurde. Jüngstes Beispiel ist die türkische protestantische Kirche Istanbul, die Ende August 2006 eröffnet wurde."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Possibility of training for theologians belonging to different religions inside the country; work permit for priests educated abroad ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17995]

"Nach türkischer Rechtslage kann die Ausbildung von Theologen aller Glaubensrichtungen bislang ausschließlich an staatlichen Hochschulen erfolgen. Dem Ökumenischen und dem Armenisch-Apostolischen Patriarchat ist seitens der türkischen Regierung wiederholt angeboten worden, Theologen und Seelsorger an einer noch zu gründenden Christlich-theologischen Fakultät der Universität Istanbul auszubilden. Während das Armenisch-Apostolische Patriarchat diesem Angebot offen gegenübersteht, kommt eine solche Lösung für das Ökumenische Patriarchat nach Kenntnis der Bundesregierung unter anderem aus kirchenrechtlichen Gründen nicht in Frage. Das Interesse der Griechisch-Orthodoxen Kirche in der Türkei richtet sich stattdessen auf eine Wiedereröffnung des 1971 geschlossenen Priesterseminars auf Heybeli Ada (Halki). Eine offizielle Antwort der türkischen Behörden auf diesen wiederholt vorgetragenen Wunsch liegt bislang nicht vor.

Mit den Durchführungsbestimmungen zum dem am 6. September 2003 in Kraft getretenen „Gesetz zur Regelung von Arbeitserlaubnissen für Ausländer“ wurde erstmalig eine Rechtsgrundlage für die Erteilung einer Arbeitserlaubnis für ausländische Seelsorger in der Türkei geschaffen. Dieser Weg wurde von der katholischen und evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland bereits mehrmals erfolgreich beschritten. Die Türkei lässt den Einsatz ausländischer Seelsorger zu, wenn es um die seelsorgerische Betreuung ausländischer Touristen und kleiner ausländischer Gemeinden geht. Aus dem Ausland stammende, nicht türkische syrianische, griechisch-orthodoxe oder armenisch-apostolische Priester können türkische Gemeinden christlichen Glaubens nicht betreuen."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Armenian, Greek Orthodox and Jewish community officially allowed to establish religious minority schools in contrary to other non-Muslim communities like Protestants and Catholics ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17996]

"Wie in der Antwort zu Frage 5 ausgeführt, haben die drei anerkannten nicht muslimischen Minderheiten das Recht, so genannte Minderheitenschulen zu betreiben. Die offiziellen Minderheitenschulen der armenischen, griechisch- orthodoxen und jüdischen Gemeinde haben jedoch entgegen der Garantien des Lausanner Vertrags mit staatlichen Behinderungen und Zugangsbeschränkungen zu kämpfen (z. B. ist der Wechsel von einer „normalen“ auf eine Minderheitenschule nicht möglich), da sie als „ausländische“ Schulen angesehen werden. Nicht muslimische Minderheiten, die gewöhnlich nicht mit dem Vertrag von Lausanne in Verbindung gebracht werden, z. B. Katholiken, Protestanten oder Syriani, dürfen immer noch keine Schulen einrichten."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

27.09.2006 - Source: Federal Government (Germany)

Religious minorities and the right to hold religious festivals in public ("Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen - BT-Drs. 16/2739 -") [ID 17997]

"Das öffentliche Feiern religiöser Feste ist möglich. Folgende Beispiele für öffentlich begangene religiöse Feste sind der Bundesregierung bekannt:

Das jährliche Fest der Alewiten zu Ehren von Haci Bektas¸ wird teilweise auch von Vertretern der türkischen Regierung besucht. Staatspräsident Sezer hielt vor einigen Jahren dort die Eröffnungsrede, Ministerpräsident Erdogan hat ein Grußwort übermittelt.

Am 1. April 2005 feierte die syrianische Gemeinde bei Mardin ein großes Frühlingsfest, zu dem auch Vertreter staatlicher Stellen kamen.

Während einer Zeremonie, bei der ein von dem griechisch-orthodoxen Patriarchen gesegnetes Kreuz von Tauchern aus dem Goldenen Horn geholt wird, kam es im vergangenen Jahr zu Demonstrationen einer kleinen Gruppe von Nationalisten. Von staatlicher Seite wurden diese Feierlichkeiten nach Erkenntnissen der Bundesregierung nicht behindert."

Document(s): BT-Drs16/2739

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Religious demography ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18460]

"The country has a total area of 301,383 square miles and a population of approximately 69.6 million. According to the Government, approximately 99 percent of the population was Muslim, the majority of which was Sunni. According to the human rights nongovernmental organization (NGO) Mazlum-Der and representatives of various religious minority communities, the actual percentage of Muslims was slightly lower. The Government officially recognized only three minority religious communities-Greek Orthodox Christians, Armenian Orthodox Christians, and Jews-although other non-Muslim communities existed. The level of religious observance varied throughout the country, in part due to the influence of secular traditions and official restrictions on religious expression in political and social life.

In addition to the country's Sunni Muslim majority, there were an estimated fifteen to twenty million Alevis, followers of a belief system that incorporates aspects of both Shi'a and Sunni Islam and draws on the traditions of other religions found in Anatolia as well. Some Alevis practice rituals that include men and women worshipping together through oratory, poetry, and dance. The Government considered Alevism a heterodox Muslim sect; however, some Alevis and radical Sunnis maintained Alevis are not Muslims.

There were several other religious groups, mostly concentrated in Istanbul and other large cities. While exact membership figures were not available, these religious groups included approximately 65,000 Armenian Orthodox Christians; 23,000 Jews; and fewer than 2,500 Greek Orthodox Christians. The Government interpreted the 1923 Lausanne Treaty as granting special legal minority status exclusively to these three groups, although the treaty text refers broadly to "non-Muslim minorities" without listing specific groups. However, this recognition did not extend to the religious leadership organs; for example, the Ecumenical and Armenian Patriarchates continued to seek recognition of their legal status.

There also were approximately 10,000 Baha'is; an estimated 15,000 Syrian Orthodox (Syriac) Christians; 5,000 Yezidis; 3,300 Jehovah's Witnesses; 3,000 Protestants; and small, undetermined numbers of Bulgarian, Chaldean, Nestorian, Georgian, Roman Catholic, and Maronite Christians. The number of Syriac Christians in the southeast was once high; however, under pressure from government authorities and later under the impact of the war against the terrorist Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), many Syriacs migrated to Istanbul, Western Europe, or North and South America. Over the last several years, small numbers of Syriacs returned from overseas to the southeast, mostly from Western Europe. In most cases, older family members returned while younger ones remained abroad.

Christian organizations estimated there were approximately 1,100 Christian missionaries in the country."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Consitution and religious freedom ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18461]

"The constitution provides for freedom of religion, and the Government generally respected this right in practice; however, the Government imposes some restrictions on Muslim and other religious groups and on Muslim religious expression in government offices, state-run institutions, and universities, usually for the stated reason of preserving the "secular state." The constitution establishes the country as a secular state and provides for freedom of belief, freedom of worship, and the private dissemination of religious ideas. However, other constitutional provisions regarding the integrity and existence of the secular state restrict these rights. The constitution prohibits discrimination on religious grounds. Core institutions of the state, including the presidency, armed forces, judiciary, and state bureaucracy, have played the role of defending traditional Turkish secularism throughout the history of the republic. In some cases, elements of the state have opposed policies of the elected Government on the grounds that they threatened the secular state.

[...] The constitution establishes compulsory religious and moral instruction in primary and secondary schools. Religious minorities are exempted. However, some religious minorities - such as Protestants - faced difficulty obtaining exemptions, particularly if their identification cards did not specifically list membership in a minority religion. The Government claims that the religion courses cover the range of world religions; however, religious minorities said the courses reflected Sunni Islamic doctrine, which, they maintained, explains why non-Muslims are exempt."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Government and religious freedom (Diyanet; General Directorate for Foundations (GDF); recognized religious minorities may operate schools under the supervision of the Ministry of Education) ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18462]

"The Government oversees Muslim religious facilities and education through the Diyanet, which is under the authority of the Prime Ministry. The Diyanet is responsible for regulating the operation of the country's more than 77,500 registered mosques and employing local and provincial imams, who are civil servants. Some groups, particularly Alevis, claimed that the Diyanet reflected mainstream Sunni Islamic beliefs to the exclusion of other beliefs; however, the Government asserted that the Diyanet treated equally all who requested services.

A separate government agency, the General Directorate for Foundations (GDF), regulates some activities of non-Muslim religious groups and their affiliated churches, monasteries, synagogues, and related religious property. There are 161 "minority foundations" recognized by the GDF, including Greek Orthodox foundations with approximately 70 sites, Armenian Orthodox foundations with approximately 50 sites, and Jewish foundations with 20 sites, as well as Syriac, Chaldean, Bulgarian Orthodox, Georgian, and Maronite foundations. The GDF also regulates historic Muslim charitable religious foundations, including schools, hospitals, and orphanages.

In 1936, the Government required all foundations to declare their sources of income. In 1974, amid political tensions over Cyprus, the High Court of Appeals ruled that the minority foundations had no right to acquire properties beyond those listed in the 1936 declarations.

The court's ruling launched a process, which continued during the period covered by this report, under which the state has seized control of properties acquired after 1936. The law also allows the state to expropriate properties in areas where the local non-Muslim population drops significantly. Minority religious groups, particularly the Greek and Armenian Orthodox communities, have lost numerous properties to the state in the past and continued to fight ongoing efforts by the state to expropriate properties.

The law allows the 161 religious minority foundations recognized by the GDF to acquire property, and the GDF has approved 364 applications by non-Muslim foundations to acquire legal ownership of properties. However, the legislation does not allow the communities to reclaim the hundreds of properties affiliated with foundations expropriated by the state over the years. Foundations have also been unable to acquire legal ownership of properties registered under names of third parties, including properties registered under the names of saints or archangels, during periods when foundations could not own property in their own name.

Government authorities do not interfere in matters of doctrine pertaining to non-Muslim religions, nor do they restrict the publication or use of religious literature among members of the religion.

There are legal restrictions against insulting any religion recognized by the Government, interfering with that religion's services, or debasing its property.

[...] Officially recognized religious minorities may operate schools under the supervision of the Ministry of Education. Such schools are required to appoint a Muslim as deputy principal; reportedly, these deputies have more authority than their nominal supervisors. The curriculum of these schools includes Greek Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, and Jewish instruction."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Restrictions on religious freedom ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18504]

"Government policy and practice contributed to the generally free practice of religion; however, state policy imposes some restrictions on religious groups and on religious expression in government offices and state-run institutions, including universities.

Secularists in the military, judiciary, and other branches of the bureaucracy continued to wage campaigns against what they label as proponents of Islamic fundamentalism. These groups view religious fundamentalism as a threat to the secular state. The National Security Council (NSC) categorizes religious fundamentalism as a threat to public safety. President Sezer delivered a speech in April 2006 in which he listed separatism and religious fundamentalism as threats facing the country. The president said that the "fundamentalist threat has reached a dangerous level" and that "Turkey's best protection against this threat is its secular order."

According to Mazlum-Der and other groups, some government ministries have dismissed or barred from promotion civil servants suspected of anti-state or Islamist activities. Reports by Mazlum-Der, the media, and others indicated that the military sometimes dismisses religiously observant Muslims from military service. Such dismissals were based on behavior that military officials believed identified these individuals as Islamic fundamentalists; they were concerned that such behavior could indicate disloyalty to the secular state.

According to Mazlum-Der, the military charged soldiers with lack of discipline for activities that included performing Muslim prayers or being married to women who wore headscarves. According to the military, officers and noncommissioned officers were sometimes dismissed for maintaining ties to Islamic fundamentalist organizations, despite repeated warnings from superior officers."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Religious services may take place only in designated places of worship; imams, priests, rabbis, or other religious leaders prohibited from "reproaching or vilifying" the government ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18506]

"Under the law, religious services may take place only in designated places of worship. Municipal codes mandate that only the Government can designate a place of worship, and, if a religion has no legal standing in the country, it may not be eligible for a designated site. Non-Muslim religious services, especially for religious groups that do not own property recognized by the GDF, often take place on diplomatic property or in private apartments. Police occasionally bar Christians from holding services in private apartments, and prosecutors have opened cases against Christians for holding unauthorized gatherings.

The law prohibits imams, priests, rabbis, or other religious leaders from "reproaching or vilifying" the Government or the laws of the state while performing their duties. Violations are punishable by prison terms of one month to one year, or three months to two years if the crime involves inciting others to disobey the law."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Proselytizing or religious conversions not explicitly prohibited; however, many prosecutors and police regard proselytizing and religious activism with suspicion ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18511]

"No law explicitly prohibits proselytizing or religious conversions; however, many prosecutors and police regard proselytizing and religious activism with suspicion. Police occasionally bar Christians from handing out religious literature. Proselytizing is often considered socially unacceptable; Christians performing missionary work are sometimes beaten and insulted. If the proselytizers are foreigners, they may be deported, but generally they are able to reenter the country. Police officers may report students who meet with Christian missionaries to their families or to university authorities.

By the end of the reporting period, there was no verdict in the trial proceedings in the case of three members of the Nationalist Movement Party who severely beat Yakup Cindilli, a convert to Christianity, for distributing New Testaments in Bursa Province in 2003."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Law makes 8 years of secular education compulsory; after completing the 8 years, students may pursue study at imam hatip (Islamic preacher) high schools ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18515]

"A 1997 law made eight years of secular education compulsory. After completing the eight years, students may pursue study at imam hatip (Islamic preacher) high schools, which cover both the standard high school curriculum and Islamic theology and practice. Imam hatip schools are classified as vocational, and graduates of vocational schools face an automatic reduction in their university entrance exam grades if they apply for university programs outside their field of high school specialization. This reduction effectively bars imam hatip graduates from enrolling in university programs other than theology. Many pious citizens criticized the religious instruction provided in the regular schools as inadequate. Most families who enrolled their children in imam hatip schools did so to expose them to more extensive religious education, not to train them as imams.

In December 2005, the Education Ministry issued a regulation allowing imam hatip students to earn degrees from regular high schools by taking distance learning courses. However, the Higher Education Council objected to the regulation, and, in February 2006, the Council of State suspended the regulation pending a final ruling.

Only the Diyanet is authorized to provide religion courses outside of school, although clandestine private courses do exist. Students who complete five years of primary school may enroll in Diyanet Qur'an classes on weekends and during summer vacation. Many Qur'an courses function unofficially. Only children twelve and older may legally register for official Qur'an courses, and Mazlum-Der reported that law enforcement authorities often raided illegal courses for younger children."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Religious affiliation listed on national identity cards; some religious groups unable to state their religion on their cards because their religion is not included among the options ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18518]

"Religious affiliation is listed on national identity cards. Some religious groups, such as the Baha'i, are unable to state their religion on their cards because their religion is not included among the options; they have made their concerns known to the Government. In April 2006, Parliament adopted legislation allowing persons to leave the religion section of their identity cards blank or change the religious designation by written application. However, it appeared that the Government may restrict applicants' choice of religion; members of the Baha'i community said government officials had told them that, despite the new law, they would not be able to list their religion on the cards.

There were reports that local officials harassed some persons who converted from Islam to another religion when they sought to amend their cards. Some non-Muslims maintained that listing religious affiliation on the cards exposed them to discrimination and harassment."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Non-Muslims reportedly barred from careers in state institutions; no reports of religious prisoners or detainees in the country ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18520]

"In October 2004, the Government's Human Rights Consultation Board issued a report on minorities, which stated that non-Muslims were effectively barred from careers in state institutions, such as the armed forces, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Police, and the National Intelligence Agency. Professors Baskin Oran and Ibrahim Kaboglu faced criminal charges for their roles as principal authors of the report. An Ankara court acquitted them in May 2006. Members of minority religious communities confirmed the report's conclusions. They said non-Muslim citizens were viewed as foreigners and were therefore considered unqualified to represent the state.

[...] There were no reports of religious prisoners or detainees in the country."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

No forced religious conversions reported in 2006 ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18522]

"There were no reports of forced religious conversion, including of minor U.S. citizens who had been abducted or illegally removed from the United States, or the refusal to allow such citizens to be returned to the United States."

Document(s): Open document

15.09.2006 - Source: US Department of State

Societal abuses and discrimination against religious minorities ("International Religious Freedom Report 2006") [ID 18525]

"The generally tolerant relationship among religions in society contributed to religious freedom; however, some Muslims, Christians, Baha'is, and other religious communities faced societal suspicion and mistrust. Jews and Christians from most denominations freely practiced their religions and reported little discrimination in daily life. However, citizens who converted from Islam to another religion often experienced some form of social harassment or pressure from family and neighbors. Proselytizing on behalf of non-Muslim religions was socially unacceptable and sometimes dangerous. A variety of newspapers and television shows regularly published and broadcasted anti-Christian messages, and government officials asserted that missionary activity was a threat to the state and was not covered under the concept of religious freedom.

Religious pluralism was widely viewed as a threat to Islam and to "national unity." Nationalist sentiments sometimes contained anti-Christian or anti-Semitic overtones. Some in the Jewish community reported growing feelings of insecurity in the wake of the 2003 attacks in Istanbul, and certain media outlets promoted anti-Semitic propaganda, including allegations that the Jewish community aided and even orchestrated the Kurdish nationalist movement."

Document(s): Open document

26.07.2006 - Source: Forum 18

Parliament departed for holidays without approving the new Law on Foundations; the proposed law would regulate how "community foundations" own and recover property; parliament will come back in September to consider this proposed law as well as other laws ("Little progress on religious freedom") [ID 17586]

Document(s): Open document

17.03.2006 - Source: BBC News

Opinion poll shows conservativism of population in matters concerningfamily and sexuality ("Poll reveals Turkish conservatism") [#46850][ID 15517]

Document(s): Open document

02.03.2006 - Source: Institute for War and Peace Reporting

Turkish women banned from wearing headscarves at Turkish universities coming to study in Bosnia and Herzegovina ("Turkish Students Take Refuge in Sarajevo") [#45795][ID 13501]

Document(s): Open document

13.12.2005 - Source: Forum 18

Commentary on need for reform of status of religious communities; attempts to improve law on foundations, including provisions governing community foundations owning property on behalf of non-Muslim religious and ethnic communities, did not pass parliament yet ("Turkey's religious communities need fundamental reform of their status") [#40544][ID 13502]

Document(s):