INDIA
- Current Issues
- Country Background, Politics & Law
- Human Rights Issues
- Security, Humanitarian Issues and Protection Related Issues
- Union States
Union States
|
Background information |
Union States A-G |
|
|
Union States H-K |
Union States M-O |
|
| Union States P-Z |
| Security situation | ||
| Political situation | Human rights situation | |
29.07.2004 - Source: South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre
Article on the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), arbitrary arrests, executions, torture ("Losing hearts and minds. It’s easy when you use laws like the AFSPA (HRF/102/04)") [#24547], [ID 7642]
Document(s):
Open document
Open document
24.05.2004 - Source: US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants
Annual report on conditions affecting refugees and asylum seekers in 2003 ("World Refugee Survey 2004") [#22816], [ID 7643]
"At least 650,000 persons were internally displaced in India. Among the displaced were 250,000-450,000 Kashmiris, an estimated 250,000 members of tribal groups in northeast India, an unknown number of persons, mostly Muslims, in Gujarat State in western India. The government impedes international access to internally displaced persons, and labels them migrants. [...]
Displacement in the Northeastern region. All of the seven states in the region have major displacement due to ethnic strife and insurgency. Most of the violence in the area by rebels has been directed against ethnic non-Bodos and Bengalis civilians. The Indian government continued to deny foreigners access to most of the northeast."
Document(s):
Open document
25.02.2004 - Source: US Department of State
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 ("Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003") [#19765], [ID 7644]
"Mizoram human rights groups estimated that some 31,000 Reangs, a tribal group from Mizoram that were displaced due to a sectarian conflict, were being sheltered in 6 camps in North Tripura. Conditions in such camps were poor, and the Tripura government asked the central Government to allot funds for their care. Reang leaders in the camps pressed for reserved jobs, education benefits, and a comprehensive rehabilitation package for refugees in the relief camps. The Mizoram government rejected these demands and maintained that only 16,000 of the refugees had a valid claim to reside in the state."
Document(s):
Open document
25.02.2004 - Source: US Department of State
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 ("Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003") [#19765], [ID 7645]
"[...]The Armed Forces Special Powers Act and the Disturbed Areas Act remained in effect in several states in which active secessionist movements exist, namely, in Jammu and Kashmir, Nagaland, Manipur, Assam, and parts of Tripura. The Disturbed Areas Act gives police extraordinary powers of arrest and detention, which, according to human rights groups, allowed security forces to operate with virtual impunity in areas under the act. The Armed Forces Special Powers Act provides search and arrest powers without warrants (see Section 1.d.). [...]"
Document(s):
Open document
25.02.2004 - Source: US Department of State
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 ("Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003") [#19765], [ID 7646]
"[...]Criminal gangs in all four southern states were known to attack rivals and deny free access to justice. In some cases, accused persons were attacked while being escorted by police to the courts. [...]"
Document(s):
Open document
25.02.2004 - Source: US Department of State
USDOS: Tripura: NLFT: Oppression of non-Christians ("Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003") [#19765], [ID 7647]
"[...]In Christian majority areas, Christians sometimes were the oppressors. In Tripura, there were several cases of harassment of non-Christians by Christian members of the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), a militant tribal group with an evangelical bent. For example, NLFT tribal insurgents have prohibited Hindu and Muslim festivals in areas that they control, cautioned women not to wear traditional Hindu tribal attire, and prohibited indigenous forms of worship. [...]"
Document(s):
Open document
